frankpuppa commented on PR #2241:
URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/pull/2241#issuecomment-3248602642
> Hi Frank, do I understand things correctly? The main difference is that
you're overriding channelInactive in Plc4xNettyWrapper and forwarding that to
the individual implementations? De
chrisdutz commented on code in PR #2241:
URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/pull/2241#discussion_r2318382862
##
plc4j/spi/src/main/java/org/apache/plc4x/java/spi/Plc4xNettyWrapper.java:
##
@@ -136,10 +136,19 @@ public ExpectRequestContext expectRequest(Class
clazz, Duration t
chrisdutz commented on PR #2241:
URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/pull/2241#issuecomment-3248466930
Could you please increase the log level for your additional log output to
something "debug" or "trace"? "info" makes the drivers quite noisy.
--
This is an automated message from the Ap
chrisdutz commented on PR #2241:
URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/pull/2241#issuecomment-3248460922
Hi Frank,
do I understand things correctly? The main difference is that you're
overriding channelInactive in Plc4xNettyWrapper and forwarding that to the
individual implementations?
frankpuppa opened a new pull request, #2241:
URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/pull/2241
While I was looking into this issue I found out that there are two leaks.
The first is related to the RequestTransactionManager and the other is from the
NettyHashTimerTimeoutManager. As I was mentio
