[GitHub] [spark-website] attilapiros commented on pull request #316: [WIP] Capture Jekyll document generation errors in the github action

attilapiros commented on pull request #316: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark-website/pull/316#issuecomment-786889537 Expected [failure](https://github.com/apache/spark-website/pull/316/checks?check_run_id=1990605260): ``` Error during document generation: /var/lib/gems/2.7

[GitHub] [spark-website] attilapiros commented on pull request #316: [WIP] Capture Jekyll document generation errors in the github action

attilapiros commented on pull request #316: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark-website/pull/316#issuecomment-786877923 This failed as expected (for details please check this[ action's log](https://github.com/apache/spark-website/pull/316/checks?check_run_id=1990436454)): ``` Error

[GitHub] [spark-website] attilapiros commented on pull request #316: [WIP] Capture Jekyll document generation errors in the github action

attilapiros commented on pull request #316: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark-website/pull/316#issuecomment-786873629 Retesting the second solution: not using temp file storing the stderr of the generation (as it will be used for generating a doc from it + detected by the 2nd check) but

[GitHub] [spark-website] attilapiros commented on pull request #316: [WIP] Capture Jekyll document generation errors in the github action

attilapiros commented on pull request #316: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark-website/pull/316#issuecomment-786846340 First it failed as expected (for details check [the full logs](https://github.com/apache/spark-website/pull/316/checks?check_run_id=1990080765)): ``` Error during d