svn commit: r1819312 - /subversion/branches/swig-py3/subversion/bindings/swig/include/proxy.swg

2017-12-26 Thread troycurtisjr
Author: troycurtisjr Date: Wed Dec 27 02:43:05 2017 New Revision: 1819312 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1819312=rev Log: On branch swig-py3: Do not hide AttributeError exception in called function. * subversion/bindings/swig/include/proxy.swg (_assert_valid_deep): Move the call to

svn commit: r1819300 - in /subversion/site/staging: faq.html faq.ja.html faq.zh.html

2017-12-26 Thread luke1410
Author: luke1410 Date: Tue Dec 26 21:54:44 2017 New Revision: 1819300 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1819300=rev Log: * site/staging/faq.html, site/staging/faq.ja.html, site/staging/faq.zh.html: Replace dead link to tigris.org dev mailing list archive with working one to haxx.se

svn propchange: r1819268 - svn:log

2017-12-26 Thread luke1410
Author: luke1410 Revision: 1819268 Modified property: svn:log Modified: svn:log at Tue Dec 26 21:52:18 2017 -- --- svn:log (original) +++ svn:log Tue Dec 26 21:52:18 2017 @@ -3,3 +3,5 @@ Remove/Mark dead link to old BDB

svn commit: r1819299 - in /subversion/site/staging: faq.html faq.ja.html faq.zh.html

2017-12-26 Thread luke1410
Author: luke1410 Date: Tue Dec 26 21:50:37 2017 New Revision: 1819299 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1819299=rev Log: * site/staging/faq.html, site/staging/faq.ja.html, site/staging/faq.zh.html: Reverted r1819268. Modified: subversion/site/staging/faq.html

svn commit: r1819296 - in /subversion/site/staging: faq.html faq.ja.html faq.zh.html

2017-12-26 Thread luke1410
Author: luke1410 Date: Tue Dec 26 21:26:52 2017 New Revision: 1819296 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1819296=rev Log: Replace link to dev mailing list thread to svn.haxx.se, since the mailing list archive on tigris.org is mostly dead. Note that while the original link still worked,

Re: svn commit: r1818724 - /subversion/site/staging/faq.html

2017-12-26 Thread Stefan
On 20/12/2017 01:08, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Stefan wrote on Tue, 19 Dec 2017 23:39 +0100: > [...] >> Since I never calculated the CVSS score for a Subversion vulnerability >> before, > If you're interested, you could go through the more recent advisories > (the security/ directories in the site