Author: dsahlberg
Date: Wed Feb 17 21:49:00 2021
New Revision: 1886641
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1886641=rev
Log:
Make life (a little bit) easier for the RM.
Follow up to r1886494 requiring the website update to be done before the
release announcement.
Den ons 17 feb. 2021 19:42Daniel Shahaf skrev:
> Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 09:46:54 +0100:
> > Den tis 16 feb. 2021 kl 21:37 skrev Daniel Shahaf <
> d...@daniel.shahaf.name>:
> > > Is it worthwhile to automate this step? doap.rdf changes rarely enough
> > > that we needn't
Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 09:46:54 +0100:
> Den tis 16 feb. 2021 kl 21:37 skrev Daniel Shahaf :
> > Is it worthwhile to automate this step? doap.rdf changes rarely enough
> > that we needn't bother with "edit part of a file" logic; we can just
> > regenerate the entire file
Author: stsp
Date: Wed Feb 17 10:45:01 2021
New Revision: 1886616
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1886616=rev
Log:
* STATUS (1.10.x): Nominate test changes relataed to CVE-2020-17525.
Reminded by: danielsh
Modified:
subversion/branches/1.10.x/STATUS
Modified:
Author: stsp
Date: Wed Feb 17 09:56:10 2021
New Revision: 1886614
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1886614=rev
Log:
* tools/dev/unix-build/Makefile.svn: Reduce HTTPD debug log level to 'warn'.
At log level 'debug' our tests generate enough logs to drive the ramdisk
of my svn-bb-openbsd
Den tis 16 feb. 2021 kl 21:37 skrev Daniel Shahaf :
> Is it worthwhile to automate this step? doap.rdf changes rarely enough
> that we needn't bother with "edit part of a file" logic; we can just
> regenerate the entire file and «svnmucc put» it into place, with a
> comment indicating it's a
