Author: futatuki
Revision: 1913099
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Thu Oct 19 04:23:27 2023
--
--- svn:log (original)
+++ svn:log Thu Oct 19 04:23:27 2023
@@ -1 +1,4 @@
* 1.14.x/STATUS: Fix the order of
Author: futatuki
Revision: 1912520
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Thu Oct 19 04:20:36 2023
--
--- svn:log (original)
+++ svn:log Thu Oct 19 04:20:36 2023
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
* 1.14.x/STATUS: Nominate
Author: futatuki
Date: Thu Oct 19 04:17:37 2023
New Revision: 1913100
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1913100=rev
Log:
* 1.14.x/STATUS: Fix typo in the revisions in r192500 group.
In r1913099, I belived I only mistaked the order of revisions in this
nomination group, but actually also
Author: futatuki
Revision: 1912520
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Thu Oct 19 04:00:25 2023
--
--- svn:log (original)
+++ svn:log Thu Oct 19 04:00:25 2023
@@ -1,2 +1,5 @@
* 1.14.x/STATUS: Nominate
Author: futatuki
Date: Thu Oct 19 03:53:53 2023
New Revision: 1913099
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1913099=rev
Log:
* 1.14.x/STATUS: Fix the order of revisions in r1912500 group.
Modified:
subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
Modified: subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
URL:
Hi,
I might have been a bit harsh here to Veto this merge, after actually
providing a positive note. But I investigated why the merge didn't go
through and I realised there is a digit missing in the nomination for the
first three revisions. I'm fairly sure it should be r1912501, r1912502,
Author: dsahlberg
Date: Thu Oct 19 00:02:48 2023
New Revision: 1913094
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1913094=rev
Log:
In branches/1.14.x:
* STATUS
Remove my nomination for the swig-py fixes. Explained on dev@
Modified:
subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
Modified:
