Author: danielsh
Date: Wed Oct 19 13:01:42 2011
New Revision: 1186183

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1186183&view=rev
Log:
Unnominate the 1.7.x-fs-verify branch.

Modified:
    subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS

Modified: subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS?rev=1186183&r1=1186182&r2=1186183&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS Wed Oct 19 13:01:42 2011
@@ -15,24 +15,6 @@ Status of 1.7.1:
 Candidate changes:
 ==================
 
- * r1146131 and followups
-   Add svn_fs_verify() and implement rep-cache verification in FSFS using it.
-   Branch:
-     1.7.x-fs-verify
-   Justification:
-     Would be nice to extend verify already in 1.7.x.
-   Notes:
-     This does not include progress reporting; that has been postponed to 1.8.
-   Conflicts:
-     On fs_fs.c.  Resolve with 'theirs-conflict'.
-   Votes:
-     +1: danielsh, rhuijben
-     +0: gstein (progress would be nice) (without r1161164, r1161180)
-     -0: cmpilato (For a function with this name, the implementation is far
-         too anemic. I'd prefer this be a private function in 1.7.x, leaving
-         room for a future public API that really does full verification.)
-         (without r1161164, r1161180)
-
  * r1147540, r1147541
    Remove unused variables in build system.
    Justification:
@@ -74,5 +56,24 @@ Candidate changes:
 Veto-blocked changes:
 =====================
 
+ * r1146131 and followups
+   Add svn_fs_verify() and implement rep-cache verification in FSFS using it.
+   Branch:
+     1.7.x-fs-verify
+   Justification:
+     Would be nice to extend verify already in 1.7.x.
+   Notes:
+     This does not include progress reporting; that has been postponed to 1.8.
+   Conflicts:
+     On fs_fs.c.  Resolve with 'theirs-conflict'.
+   Votes:
+     +1: danielsh, rhuijben
+     +0: gstein (progress would be nice) (without r1161164, r1161180)
+     -0: cmpilato (For a function with this name, the implementation is far
+         too anemic. I'd prefer this be a private function in 1.7.x, leaving
+         room for a future public API that really does full verification.)
+         (without r1161164, r1161180)
+     -1: danielsh (invasive, new feature)
+
 Approved changes:
 =================


Reply via email to