Lunderberg commented on pull request #9194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/9194#issuecomment-954216369
Closing this PR, as changes resulting from discussion on
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/39 has made this change no longer
desirable.
--
This is an automated message
Lunderberg commented on pull request #9194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/9194#issuecomment-943406846
Updated to resolve breaks this caused in ethos unit tests.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
Lunderberg commented on pull request #9194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/9194#issuecomment-937820182
Updated to resolve conflicts with main, change `[size]` to `size` in a
unittest that I had missed the first time around.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
Lunderberg commented on pull request #9194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/9194#issuecomment-937820182
Updated to resolve conflicts with main, change `[size]` to `size` in a
unittest that I had missed the first time around.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
Lunderberg commented on pull request #9194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/9194#issuecomment-934873687
I've [started a PR for an RFC](https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/0039)
that describes the motivation for this change in more detail. This change to
`AllocateNode::extent`
Lunderberg commented on pull request #9194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/9194#issuecomment-933820926
@csullivan @tmoreau89
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
