roastduck commented on pull request #5382:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/5382#issuecomment-625574365
@yongfeng-nv Fixed.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
roastduck commented on pull request #5382:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/5382#issuecomment-625044388
@yongfeng-nv Thanks. Your improved test helps a lot.
I call `tvm.driver.build_module.form_irmodule` directly, in order not to run
the transformation passes in `low
roastduck commented on pull request #5382:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/5382#issuecomment-623041791
It will be great if someone can make a review.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
roastduck commented on pull request #5382:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/5382#issuecomment-620456420
@wpan11nv Could you explain how subgroups in OpenCL works? Up to now, we
always assumed `threadIdx.x` equals to warp in the `lower_warp_memory` pass.
Does it mean there
roastduck commented on pull request #5382:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/5382#issuecomment-619291622
Do you mean requiring the users to tag the iter_var or we do it in
InferBound? If the former, maybe we can merge this PR first and then start an
RFC for the API change.
