FrozenGene edited a comment on issue #4803: [WIP][Frontend] Asymmetric padding 
of convolution support
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/4803#issuecomment-581793013
 
 
   Thanks for the quick response @anijain2305 !
   
   > I can handle them in 2 separate PRs. For Conv2D attrs, I will have to put 
RFC to gather everybody thoughts on changing the Conv2D API. Not sure, if 
everybody will be happy with changing extensively used Conv2D API.
   
   Yes. I agree we should file a RFC, because this affects many aspects, even 
Conv1D, Conv3D, because we should unify these attrs too.
   
   > 
   > @FrozenGene do you have any rough numbers for what is the padding overhead 
if we have it a separate operator? For C5 Cascade/Skylake servers, I don't see 
pad taking any significant time. So, just curious. (maybe bad schedule for 
other platforms)
   
   I am very sad that I lost the number. I don't know whether @Rasterer has 
record number. Previous testing on one arm device [i.MX6 
](https://www.nxp.com/products/processors-and-microcontrollers/arm-processors/i.mx-applications-processors/i.mx-6-processors:IMX6X_SERIES),
 ARM cortex A9 cpu, which has performance impact. Your skylake CPU is too 
strong so that we maybe can not observe significant overhead.
   
   Meanwhile, you could put an eye on this PR 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/4807, it shouldn't fail on qnn 
mobilenet v1 test. Its logic is correct.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to