[jira] [Commented] (AIRFLOW-4843) Allow orchestration of tasks with Docker Swarm aka `SwarmOperator`

2019-12-18 Thread ASF subversion and git services (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16999326#comment-16999326
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on AIRFLOW-4843:
--

Commit 29cd0babf42a200671bbcf6b5df627735417c2f9 in airflow's branch 
refs/heads/v1-10-test from Ash Berlin-Taylor
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=airflow.git;h=29cd0ba ]

fixup! [AIRFLOW-4843] Allow orchestration via Docker Swarm (SwarmOperator) 
(#5489)


> Allow orchestration of tasks with Docker Swarm aka `SwarmOperator`
> --
>
> Key: AIRFLOW-4843
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4843
> Project: Apache Airflow
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: operators
>Affects Versions: 1.10.3
>Reporter: Akshesh Doshi
>Assignee: Akshesh Doshi
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: Docker, docker, orchestration, swarm
> Fix For: 1.10.7
>
>
> Currently, Airflow supports spawning Docker containers for running tasks via 
> the {color:#707070}_DockerOperator_{color} but these containers are run on 
> the same node as the scheduler.
> It would be helpful for our use-case to be able to spawn these tasks wherever 
> resources are available in our Docker Swarm cluster.
>  
> This can be achieved by creating a Docker swarm service, waiting for its run 
> and removing it after it has completed execution.
> This approach has been suggested/discussed at various places (and implemented 
> in Golang for Swarm-cronjob):
> [https://blog.alexellis.io/containers-on-swarm/]
> [https://forums.docker.com/t/running-one-off-commands-in-swarm-containers/42436/3]
> [https://gist.github.com/alexellis/e11321b8fbfc595c208ea3e74bf5e54b]
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Commented] (AIRFLOW-4843) Allow orchestration of tasks with Docker Swarm aka `SwarmOperator`

2019-08-13 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16906256#comment-16906256
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on AIRFLOW-4843:
--

Commit 3e2a02751cf890b780bc26b40c7cee7f1f4e0bd9 in airflow's branch 
refs/heads/master from Akshesh Doshi
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=airflow.git;h=3e2a027 ]

[AIRFLOW-4843] Allow orchestration via Docker Swarm (SwarmOperator) (#5489)

* [AIRFLOW-4843] Allow orchestration via Docker Swarm (SwarmOperator)

Add support for running Docker containers via Docker Swarm
which allows the task to run on any machine (node) which
is a part of your Swarm cluster

More details: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4843

Built with <3 at Agoda!

> Allow orchestration of tasks with Docker Swarm aka `SwarmOperator`
> --
>
> Key: AIRFLOW-4843
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4843
> Project: Apache Airflow
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: operators
>Affects Versions: 1.10.3
>Reporter: Akshesh Doshi
>Assignee: Akshesh Doshi
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: Docker, docker, orchestration, swarm
>
> Currently, Airflow supports spawning Docker containers for running tasks via 
> the {color:#707070}_DockerOperator_{color} but these containers are run on 
> the same node as the scheduler.
> It would be helpful for our use-case to be able to spawn these tasks wherever 
> resources are available in our Docker Swarm cluster.
>  
> This can be achieved by creating a Docker swarm service, waiting for its run 
> and removing it after it has completed execution.
> This approach has been suggested/discussed at various places (and implemented 
> in Golang for Swarm-cronjob):
> [https://blog.alexellis.io/containers-on-swarm/]
> [https://forums.docker.com/t/running-one-off-commands-in-swarm-containers/42436/3]
> [https://gist.github.com/alexellis/e11321b8fbfc595c208ea3e74bf5e54b]
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)


[jira] [Commented] (AIRFLOW-4843) Allow orchestration of tasks with Docker Swarm aka `SwarmOperator`

2019-08-13 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16906258#comment-16906258
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on AIRFLOW-4843:
--

Commit 3e2a02751cf890b780bc26b40c7cee7f1f4e0bd9 in airflow's branch 
refs/heads/master from Akshesh Doshi
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=airflow.git;h=3e2a027 ]

[AIRFLOW-4843] Allow orchestration via Docker Swarm (SwarmOperator) (#5489)

* [AIRFLOW-4843] Allow orchestration via Docker Swarm (SwarmOperator)

Add support for running Docker containers via Docker Swarm
which allows the task to run on any machine (node) which
is a part of your Swarm cluster

More details: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4843

Built with <3 at Agoda!

> Allow orchestration of tasks with Docker Swarm aka `SwarmOperator`
> --
>
> Key: AIRFLOW-4843
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4843
> Project: Apache Airflow
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: operators
>Affects Versions: 1.10.3
>Reporter: Akshesh Doshi
>Assignee: Akshesh Doshi
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: Docker, docker, orchestration, swarm
>
> Currently, Airflow supports spawning Docker containers for running tasks via 
> the {color:#707070}_DockerOperator_{color} but these containers are run on 
> the same node as the scheduler.
> It would be helpful for our use-case to be able to spawn these tasks wherever 
> resources are available in our Docker Swarm cluster.
>  
> This can be achieved by creating a Docker swarm service, waiting for its run 
> and removing it after it has completed execution.
> This approach has been suggested/discussed at various places (and implemented 
> in Golang for Swarm-cronjob):
> [https://blog.alexellis.io/containers-on-swarm/]
> [https://forums.docker.com/t/running-one-off-commands-in-swarm-containers/42436/3]
> [https://gist.github.com/alexellis/e11321b8fbfc595c208ea3e74bf5e54b]
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)


[jira] [Commented] (AIRFLOW-4843) Allow orchestration of tasks with Docker Swarm aka `SwarmOperator`

2019-08-13 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16906255#comment-16906255
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on AIRFLOW-4843:
-

mik-laj commented on pull request #5489: [AIRFLOW-4843] Allow orchestration via 
Docker Swarm (SwarmOperator)
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/5489
 
 
   
 

This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


> Allow orchestration of tasks with Docker Swarm aka `SwarmOperator`
> --
>
> Key: AIRFLOW-4843
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4843
> Project: Apache Airflow
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: operators
>Affects Versions: 1.10.3
>Reporter: Akshesh Doshi
>Assignee: Akshesh Doshi
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: Docker, docker, orchestration, swarm
>
> Currently, Airflow supports spawning Docker containers for running tasks via 
> the {color:#707070}_DockerOperator_{color} but these containers are run on 
> the same node as the scheduler.
> It would be helpful for our use-case to be able to spawn these tasks wherever 
> resources are available in our Docker Swarm cluster.
>  
> This can be achieved by creating a Docker swarm service, waiting for its run 
> and removing it after it has completed execution.
> This approach has been suggested/discussed at various places (and implemented 
> in Golang for Swarm-cronjob):
> [https://blog.alexellis.io/containers-on-swarm/]
> [https://forums.docker.com/t/running-one-off-commands-in-swarm-containers/42436/3]
> [https://gist.github.com/alexellis/e11321b8fbfc595c208ea3e74bf5e54b]
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)


[jira] [Commented] (AIRFLOW-4843) Allow orchestration of tasks with Docker Swarm aka `SwarmOperator`

2019-08-13 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16906257#comment-16906257
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on AIRFLOW-4843:
--

Commit 3e2a02751cf890b780bc26b40c7cee7f1f4e0bd9 in airflow's branch 
refs/heads/master from Akshesh Doshi
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=airflow.git;h=3e2a027 ]

[AIRFLOW-4843] Allow orchestration via Docker Swarm (SwarmOperator) (#5489)

* [AIRFLOW-4843] Allow orchestration via Docker Swarm (SwarmOperator)

Add support for running Docker containers via Docker Swarm
which allows the task to run on any machine (node) which
is a part of your Swarm cluster

More details: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4843

Built with <3 at Agoda!

> Allow orchestration of tasks with Docker Swarm aka `SwarmOperator`
> --
>
> Key: AIRFLOW-4843
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4843
> Project: Apache Airflow
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: operators
>Affects Versions: 1.10.3
>Reporter: Akshesh Doshi
>Assignee: Akshesh Doshi
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: Docker, docker, orchestration, swarm
>
> Currently, Airflow supports spawning Docker containers for running tasks via 
> the {color:#707070}_DockerOperator_{color} but these containers are run on 
> the same node as the scheduler.
> It would be helpful for our use-case to be able to spawn these tasks wherever 
> resources are available in our Docker Swarm cluster.
>  
> This can be achieved by creating a Docker swarm service, waiting for its run 
> and removing it after it has completed execution.
> This approach has been suggested/discussed at various places (and implemented 
> in Golang for Swarm-cronjob):
> [https://blog.alexellis.io/containers-on-swarm/]
> [https://forums.docker.com/t/running-one-off-commands-in-swarm-containers/42436/3]
> [https://gist.github.com/alexellis/e11321b8fbfc595c208ea3e74bf5e54b]
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)


[jira] [Commented] (AIRFLOW-4843) Allow orchestration of tasks with Docker Swarm aka `SwarmOperator`

2019-07-29 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16895764#comment-16895764
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on AIRFLOW-4843:
-

akki commented on pull request #5483: [AIRFLOW-4843] Allow orchestration via 
Docker Swarm aka SwarmOperator 
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/5483
 
 
   
 

This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


> Allow orchestration of tasks with Docker Swarm aka `SwarmOperator`
> --
>
> Key: AIRFLOW-4843
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4843
> Project: Apache Airflow
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: operators
>Affects Versions: 1.10.3
>Reporter: Akshesh Doshi
>Assignee: Akshesh Doshi
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: Docker, docker, orchestration, swarm
>
> Currently, Airflow supports spawning Docker containers for running tasks via 
> the {color:#707070}_DockerOperator_{color} but these containers are run on 
> the same node as the scheduler.
> It would be helpful for our use-case to be able to spawn these tasks wherever 
> resources are available in our Docker Swarm cluster.
>  
> This can be achieved by creating a Docker swarm service, waiting for its run 
> and removing it after it has completed execution.
> This approach has been suggested/discussed at various places (and implemented 
> in Golang for Swarm-cronjob):
> [https://blog.alexellis.io/containers-on-swarm/]
> [https://forums.docker.com/t/running-one-off-commands-in-swarm-containers/42436/3]
> [https://gist.github.com/alexellis/e11321b8fbfc595c208ea3e74bf5e54b]
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)


[jira] [Commented] (AIRFLOW-4843) Allow orchestration of tasks with Docker Swarm aka `SwarmOperator`

2019-06-26 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16873562#comment-16873562
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on AIRFLOW-4843:
-

akki commented on pull request #5489: [AIRFLOW-4843] Allow orchestration via 
Docker Swarm (SwarmOperator)
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/5489
 
 
   Make sure you have checked _all_ steps below.
   
   ### Jira
   
   - [x] My PR addresses the following 
[AIRFLOW-4843](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4843/) issues and 
references them in the PR title.
 - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4843
 - In case you are fixing a typo in the documentation you can prepend your 
commit with \[AIRFLOW-XXX\], code changes always need a Jira issue.
 - In case you are proposing a fundamental code change, you need to create 
an Airflow Improvement Proposal 
([AIP](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Airflow+Improvements+Proposals)).
 - In case you are adding a dependency, check if the license complies with 
the [ASF 3rd Party License 
Policy](https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x).
   
   ### Description
   
   - [x] Here are some details about my PR, including screenshots of any UI 
changes:
  Added in issue - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4843
   
   ### Tests
   
   - [x] My PR adds the following unit tests:
   `SwarmOperatorTestCase`
   
   ### Commits
   
   - [x] My commits all reference Jira issues in their subject lines, and I 
have squashed multiple commits if they address the same issue. In addition, my 
commits follow the guidelines from "[How to write a good git commit 
message](http://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/)":
 1. Subject is separated from body by a blank line
 1. Subject is limited to 50 characters (not including Jira issue reference)
 1. Subject does not end with a period
 1. Subject uses the imperative mood ("add", not "adding")
 1. Body wraps at 72 characters
 1. Body explains "what" and "why", not "how"
   
   ### Documentation
   
   - [x] In case of new functionality, my PR adds documentation that describes 
how to use it.
 - All the public functions and the classes in the PR contain docstrings 
that explain what it does
 - If you implement backwards incompatible changes, please leave a note in 
the [Updating.md](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/master/UPDATING.md) so 
we can assign it to a appropriate release
   
   ### Code Quality
   
   - [x] Passes `flake8`
   
 

This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


> Allow orchestration of tasks with Docker Swarm aka `SwarmOperator`
> --
>
> Key: AIRFLOW-4843
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4843
> Project: Apache Airflow
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: operators
>Affects Versions: 1.10.3
>Reporter: Akshesh Doshi
>Assignee: Akshesh Doshi
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: Docker, docker, orchestration, swarm
>
> Currently, Airflow supports spawning Docker containers for running tasks via 
> the {color:#707070}_DockerOperator_{color} but these containers are run on 
> the same node as the scheduler.
> It would be helpful for our use-case to be able to spawn these tasks wherever 
> resources are available in our Docker Swarm cluster.
>  
> This can be achieved by creating a Docker swarm service, waiting for its run 
> and removing it after it has completed execution.
> This approach has been suggested/discussed at various places (and implemented 
> in Golang for Swarm-cronjob):
> [https://blog.alexellis.io/containers-on-swarm/]
> [https://forums.docker.com/t/running-one-off-commands-in-swarm-containers/42436/3]
> [https://gist.github.com/alexellis/e11321b8fbfc595c208ea3e74bf5e54b]
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (AIRFLOW-4843) Allow orchestration of tasks with Docker Swarm aka `SwarmOperator`

2019-06-26 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16873049#comment-16873049
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on AIRFLOW-4843:
-

akki commented on pull request #5483: [AIRFLOW-4843] Allow orchestration via 
Docker Swarm aka SwarmOperator 
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/5483
 
 
   Make sure you have checked _all_ steps below.
   
   ### Jira
   
   - [x] My PR addresses the following 
[AIRFLOW-4843](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4843/) issues and 
references them in the PR title.
 - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4843
 - In case you are fixing a typo in the documentation you can prepend your 
commit with \[AIRFLOW-XXX\], code changes always need a Jira issue.
 - In case you are proposing a fundamental code change, you need to create 
an Airflow Improvement Proposal 
([AIP](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Airflow+Improvements+Proposals)).
 - In case you are adding a dependency, check if the license complies with 
the [ASF 3rd Party License 
Policy](https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x).
   
   ### Description
   
   - [x] Here are some details about my PR, including screenshots of any UI 
changes:
  Added in issue - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4843
   
   ### Tests
   
   - [x] My PR adds the following unit tests:
   `SwarmOperatorTestCase`
   
   ### Commits
   
   - [ ] My commits all reference Jira issues in their subject lines, and I 
have squashed multiple commits if they address the same issue. In addition, my 
commits follow the guidelines from "[How to write a good git commit 
message](http://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/)":
 1. Subject is separated from body by a blank line
 1. Subject is limited to 50 characters (not including Jira issue reference)
 1. Subject does not end with a period
 1. Subject uses the imperative mood ("add", not "adding")
 1. Body wraps at 72 characters
 1. Body explains "what" and "why", not "how"
   
   ### Documentation
   
   - [x] In case of new functionality, my PR adds documentation that describes 
how to use it.
 - All the public functions and the classes in the PR contain docstrings 
that explain what it does
 - If you implement backwards incompatible changes, please leave a note in 
the [Updating.md](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/master/UPDATING.md) so 
we can assign it to a appropriate release
   
   ### Code Quality
   
   - [ ] Passes `flake8`
   
 

This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


> Allow orchestration of tasks with Docker Swarm aka `SwarmOperator`
> --
>
> Key: AIRFLOW-4843
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4843
> Project: Apache Airflow
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: operators
>Affects Versions: 1.10.3
>Reporter: Akshesh Doshi
>Assignee: Akshesh Doshi
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: Docker, docker, orchestration, swarm
>
> Currently, Airflow supports spawning Docker containers for running tasks via 
> the {color:#707070}_DockerOperator_{color} but these containers are run on 
> the same node as the scheduler.
> It would be helpful for our use-case to be able to spawn these tasks wherever 
> resources are available in our Docker Swarm cluster.
>  
> This can be achieved by creating a Docker swarm service, waiting for its run 
> and removing it after it has completed execution.
> This approach has been suggested/discussed at various places (and implemented 
> in Golang for Swarm-cronjob):
> [https://blog.alexellis.io/containers-on-swarm/]
> [https://forums.docker.com/t/running-one-off-commands-in-swarm-containers/42436/3]
> [https://gist.github.com/alexellis/e11321b8fbfc595c208ea3e74bf5e54b]
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)