[jira] [Updated] (AIRFLOW-1011) Fix bug in BackfillJob._execute() for SubDAGs

2017-04-03 Thread Bolke de Bruin (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Bolke de Bruin updated AIRFLOW-1011:

Fix Version/s: 1.8.1

> Fix bug in BackfillJob._execute() for SubDAGs
> -
>
> Key: AIRFLOW-1011
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1011
> Project: Apache Airflow
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: backfill, subdag
>Affects Versions: 1.8.0
>Reporter: Joe Schmid
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 1.8.1
>
> Attachments: 1-TopLevelDAGTaskInstancesShownCorrectly.png, 
> 2-ZoomedSubDAG-NoTaskInstances-v1.8.png, 
> 3-ZoomedSubDAG-TaskInstances-v1.7.1.3.png, subdag_task_instance_logs.txt, 
> test_subdag.py
>
>
> The attached test SubDAG is not executed when the parent DAG is triggered 
> manually. Attached is a simple test DAG that exhibits the issue along with 
> screenshots showing the UI differences between v1.8 and v1.7.1.3.
> Note that if the DAG is run via backfill from command line (e.g. "airflow 
> backfill Test_SubDAG -s 2017-03-18 -e 2017-03-18") the task instances show up 
> successfully.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)


[jira] [Updated] (AIRFLOW-1011) Fix bug in BackfillJob._execute() for SubDAGs

2017-03-25 Thread Bolke de Bruin (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Bolke de Bruin updated AIRFLOW-1011:

Priority: Blocker  (was: Critical)

> Fix bug in BackfillJob._execute() for SubDAGs
> -
>
> Key: AIRFLOW-1011
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1011
> Project: Apache Airflow
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: backfill, subdag
>Affects Versions: Airflow 1.8
>Reporter: Joe Schmid
>Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: 1-TopLevelDAGTaskInstancesShownCorrectly.png, 
> 2-ZoomedSubDAG-NoTaskInstances-v1.8.png, 
> 3-ZoomedSubDAG-TaskInstances-v1.7.1.3.png, subdag_task_instance_logs.txt, 
> test_subdag.py
>
>
> The attached test SubDAG is not executed when the parent DAG is triggered 
> manually. Attached is a simple test DAG that exhibits the issue along with 
> screenshots showing the UI differences between v1.8 and v1.7.1.3.
> Note that if the DAG is run via backfill from command line (e.g. "airflow 
> backfill Test_SubDAG -s 2017-03-18 -e 2017-03-18") the task instances show up 
> successfully.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)


[jira] [Updated] (AIRFLOW-1011) Fix bug in BackfillJob._execute() for SubDAGs

2017-03-22 Thread Joe Schmid (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Joe Schmid updated AIRFLOW-1011:

Summary: Fix bug in BackfillJob._execute() for SubDAGs  (was: SubDAG not 
executed when DAG triggered manually)

> Fix bug in BackfillJob._execute() for SubDAGs
> -
>
> Key: AIRFLOW-1011
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1011
> Project: Apache Airflow
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: backfill, subdag
>Affects Versions: Airflow 1.8
>Reporter: Joe Schmid
>Priority: Critical
> Attachments: 1-TopLevelDAGTaskInstancesShownCorrectly.png, 
> 2-ZoomedSubDAG-NoTaskInstances-v1.8.png, 
> 3-ZoomedSubDAG-TaskInstances-v1.7.1.3.png, subdag_task_instance_logs.txt, 
> test_subdag.py
>
>
> In previous Airflow versions, results for tasks executed as a subdag were 
> written as rows to task_instances. In Airflow 1.8 only rows for tasks inside 
> the top-level DAG (non-subdag tasks) seem to get written to the database.
> This results in being unable to check the status of task instances inside the 
> subdag from the UI, check the logs for those task instances from the UI, etc.
> Attached is a simple test DAG that exhibits the issue along with screenshots 
> showing the UI differences between v1.8 and v1.7.1.3.
> Note that if the DAG is run via backfill from command line (e.g. "airflow 
> backfill Test_SubDAG -s 2017-03-18 -e 2017-03-18") the task instances show up 
> successfully.
> Also, we're using CeleryExecutor and not specifying a different executor for 
> our subdags.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)