[GitHub] [calcite] DonnyZone commented on issue #1806: Following [CALCITE-3763] Fix slow test failure

2020-02-16 Thread GitBox
DonnyZone commented on issue #1806: Following [CALCITE-3763] Fix slow test 
failure
URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1806#issuecomment-586687362
 
 
   Thanks, updated. It seems that ES test fails easily due to timeout.


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services


[GitHub] [calcite] DonnyZone commented on issue #1806: Following [CALCITE-3763] Fix slow test failure

2020-02-14 Thread GitBox
DonnyZone commented on issue #1806: Following [CALCITE-3763] Fix slow test 
failure
URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1806#issuecomment-586561138
 
 
   It is too tiny to fire a discussion. As what you do for CALCITE-3769 (i.e., 
changing the expected plan string from `LogicalTableScan` to `StarTableScan`), 
why do we not do the same thing for `testLatticeStarTable`? Because removing 
this extra `Project` is the expected result of CALCITE-3763.


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services


[GitHub] [calcite] DonnyZone commented on issue #1806: Following [CALCITE-3763] Fix slow test failure

2020-02-14 Thread GitBox
DonnyZone commented on issue #1806: Following [CALCITE-3763] Fix slow test 
failure
URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1806#issuecomment-586488735
 
 
   From my personal view, since CALCITE-3763 prunes extra projects, we'd better 
modify the expected plan string as you do for CALCITE-3769. On the other hand, 
checking “CannotPlanException” is generally used in LatticeTest to indicate 
match failure, therefore, checking “Assertion” seems to be meaningless.


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services