Re: [PR] [Improvement](external) Increase scanner concurrency (#58073) [doris]

2025-12-10 Thread via GitHub


zclllyybb merged PR #58928:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/58928


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]



Re: [PR] [Improvement](external) Increase scanner concurrency (#58073) [doris]

2025-12-10 Thread via GitHub


zclllyybb merged PR #58927:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/58927


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]



Re: [PR] [Improvement](external) Increase scanner concurrency (#58073) [doris]

2025-12-10 Thread via GitHub


Thearas commented on PR #58928:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/58928#issuecomment-3639741096

   
   Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
   Don't know what should be done next? See [How to process your 
PR](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DORIS/How+to+process+your+PR).
   
   Please clearly describe your PR:
   1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting 
information). How it was fixed.
   2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it 
now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
   3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
   4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
   5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and 
after the optimization?
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]



[PR] [Improvement](external) Increase scanner concurrency (#58073) [doris]

2025-12-10 Thread via GitHub


Gabriel39 opened a new pull request, #58928:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/58928

   The concurrency of scanners are controlled by some variables which is not 
suitable for different cases. For external tables, we need more scanners than 
the internal tables. In this PR, the concurrency variable is splitted from the 
origin one.
   
   None
   
   - Test 
   - [ ] Regression test
   - [ ] Unit Test
   - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
   - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
   - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
   - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have 
been changed. - [ ] Other reason 
   
   - Behavior changed:
   - [ ] No.
   - [ ] Yes. 
   
   - Does this need documentation?
   - [ ] No.
   - [ ] Yes. 
   
   - [ ] Confirm the release note
   - [ ] Confirm test cases
   - [ ] Confirm document
   - [ ] Add branch pick label 
   
   ### What problem does this PR solve?
   
   Issue Number: close #xxx
   
   Related PR: #xxx
   
   Problem Summary:
   
   ### Release note
   
   None
   
   ### Check List (For Author)
   
   - Test 
   - [ ] Regression test
   - [ ] Unit Test
   - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
   - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
   - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
   - [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
   - [ ] No code files have been changed.
   - [ ] Other reason 
   
   - Behavior changed:
   - [ ] No.
   - [ ] Yes. 
   
   - Does this need documentation?
   - [ ] No.
   - [ ] Yes. 
   
   ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
   
   - [ ] Confirm the release note
   - [ ] Confirm test cases
   - [ ] Confirm document
   - [ ] Add branch pick label 
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]



Re: [PR] [Improvement](external) Increase scanner concurrency (#58073) [doris]

2025-12-10 Thread via GitHub


Thearas commented on PR #58927:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/58927#issuecomment-3639739207

   
   Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
   Don't know what should be done next? See [How to process your 
PR](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DORIS/How+to+process+your+PR).
   
   Please clearly describe your PR:
   1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting 
information). How it was fixed.
   2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it 
now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
   3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
   4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
   5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and 
after the optimization?
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]



[PR] [Improvement](external) Increase scanner concurrency (#58073) [doris]

2025-12-10 Thread via GitHub


Gabriel39 opened a new pull request, #58927:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/58927

   The concurrency of scanners are controlled by some variables which is not 
suitable for different cases. For external tables, we need more scanners than 
the internal tables. In this PR, the concurrency variable is splitted from the 
origin one.
   
   None
   
   - Test 
   - [ ] Regression test
   - [ ] Unit Test
   - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
   - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
   - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
   - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have 
been changed. - [ ] Other reason 
   
   - Behavior changed:
   - [ ] No.
   - [ ] Yes. 
   
   - Does this need documentation?
   - [ ] No.
   - [ ] Yes. 
   
   - [ ] Confirm the release note
   - [ ] Confirm test cases
   - [ ] Confirm document
   - [ ] Add branch pick label 
   
   ### What problem does this PR solve?
   
   Issue Number: close #xxx
   
   Related PR: #xxx
   
   Problem Summary:
   
   ### Release note
   
   None
   
   ### Check List (For Author)
   
   - Test 
   - [ ] Regression test
   - [ ] Unit Test
   - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
   - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
   - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
   - [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
   - [ ] No code files have been changed.
   - [ ] Other reason 
   
   - Behavior changed:
   - [ ] No.
   - [ ] Yes. 
   
   - Does this need documentation?
   - [ ] No.
   - [ ] Yes. 
   
   ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
   
   - [ ] Confirm the release note
   - [ ] Confirm test cases
   - [ ] Confirm document
   - [ ] Add branch pick label 
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]



Re: [PR] [Improvement](external) Increase scanner concurrency (#58073) [doris]

2025-12-03 Thread via GitHub


yiguolei merged PR #58678:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/58678


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]



Re: [PR] [Improvement](external) Increase scanner concurrency (#58073) [doris]

2025-12-03 Thread via GitHub


hello-stephen commented on PR #58678:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/58678#issuecomment-3606460732

   # BE UT Coverage Report
   Increment line coverage `19.63% (21/107)` :tada:
   
   [Increment coverage 
report](http://coverage.selectdb-in.cc/coverage/72e33b8e7baeee1c53ce4b3bcf11b259de3a7b01_72e33b8e7baeee1c53ce4b3bcf11b259de3a7b01/increment_report/index.html)
   [Complete coverage 
report](http://coverage.selectdb-in.cc/coverage/72e33b8e7baeee1c53ce4b3bcf11b259de3a7b01_72e33b8e7baeee1c53ce4b3bcf11b259de3a7b01/report/index.html)
   | Category  | Coverage   |
   |---||
   | Function Coverage | 53.37% (18468/34605) |
   | Line Coverage | 38.84% (169339/435970) |
   | Region Coverage   | 33.59% (130932/389818) |
   | Branch Coverage   | 34.47% (56443/163749) |


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]



Re: [PR] [Improvement](external) Increase scanner concurrency (#58073) [doris]

2025-12-03 Thread via GitHub


hello-stephen commented on PR #58678:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/58678#issuecomment-3605938934

   # FE UT Coverage Report
   Increment line coverage `  80.00% (8/10)` :tada:
   [Increment coverage 
report](http://coverage.selectdb-in.cc/coverage/58678_72e33b8e7baeee1c53ce4b3bcf11b259de3a7b01/fe_increment_report/index.html)
   [Complete coverage 
report](http://coverage.selectdb-in.cc/coverage/58678_72e33b8e7baeee1c53ce4b3bcf11b259de3a7b01/fe_report/index.html)
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]



Re: [PR] [Improvement](external) Increase scanner concurrency (#58073) [doris]

2025-12-03 Thread via GitHub


Gabriel39 commented on PR #58678:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/58678#issuecomment-3605628074

   run buildall


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]



Re: [PR] [Improvement](external) Increase scanner concurrency (#58073) [doris]

2025-12-03 Thread via GitHub


Thearas commented on PR #58678:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/58678#issuecomment-3605627821

   
   Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
   Don't know what should be done next? See [How to process your 
PR](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DORIS/How+to+process+your+PR).
   
   Please clearly describe your PR:
   1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting 
information). How it was fixed.
   2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it 
now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
   3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
   4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
   5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and 
after the optimization?
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]



[PR] [Improvement](external) Increase scanner concurrency (#58073) [doris]

2025-12-03 Thread via GitHub


Gabriel39 opened a new pull request, #58678:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/58678

   The concurrency of scanners are controlled by some variables which is not 
suitable for different cases. For external tables, we need more scanners than 
the internal tables. In this PR, the concurrency variable is splitted from the 
origin one.
   
   None
   
   - Test 
   - [ ] Regression test
   - [ ] Unit Test
   - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
   - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
   - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
   - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have 
been changed. - [ ] Other reason 
   
   - Behavior changed:
   - [ ] No.
   - [ ] Yes. 
   
   - Does this need documentation?
   - [ ] No.
   - [ ] Yes. 
   
   - [ ] Confirm the release note
   - [ ] Confirm test cases
   - [ ] Confirm document
   - [ ] Add branch pick label 
   
   ### What problem does this PR solve?
   
   Issue Number: close #xxx
   
   Related PR: #xxx
   
   Problem Summary:
   
   ### Release note
   
   None
   
   ### Check List (For Author)
   
   - Test 
   - [ ] Regression test
   - [ ] Unit Test
   - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
   - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
   - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
   - [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
   - [ ] No code files have been changed.
   - [ ] Other reason 
   
   - Behavior changed:
   - [ ] No.
   - [ ] Yes. 
   
   - Does this need documentation?
   - [ ] No.
   - [ ] Yes. 
   
   ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
   
   - [ ] Confirm the release note
   - [ ] Confirm test cases
   - [ ] Confirm document
   - [ ] Add branch pick label 
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]