leezu commented on pull request #18379:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18379#issuecomment-634416400
@yajiedesign please clarify how you plan to address the CI CD discrepancy?
This is an automated message
leezu commented on pull request #18379:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18379#issuecomment-632996894
Yes, that's an option. I'm not convinced though that only fixing this
current incompatibility without introducing any mechanism of preventing future
problems is helpful.
leezu commented on pull request #18379:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18379#issuecomment-632974522
MXNet 2 will be released after Cuda 11 release, so there is no Cuda 9
support in MXNet 2 currently
This
leezu commented on pull request #18379:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18379#issuecomment-632964034
(Soon Cuda 11 will be released and we'll drop Cuda 9 support in any case)
This is an automated message
leezu commented on pull request #18379:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18379#issuecomment-632963894
Thanks for clarifying. In that case, should we either drop the old Cuda
versions for MXNet 2 or switch the CI to an older MSVC version? What do you
think?
---
