[GitHub] cjolivier01 commented on issue #9858: softsign activation function

2018-02-22 Thread GitBox
cjolivier01 commented on issue #9858: softsign activation function
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/9858#issuecomment-367858332
 
 
   +1 would have to go into all releases after 0.11


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services


[GitHub] cjolivier01 commented on issue #9858: softsign activation function

2018-02-22 Thread GitBox
cjolivier01 commented on issue #9858: softsign activation function
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/9858#issuecomment-367833441
 
 
   "whenever it's convenient"?  none of this seems terribly "convenient".  Not 
sure where that framing came from.  Customer obsessions is rarely about 
convenience.
   Anyway, contrib sounds fine, to me.


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services


[GitHub] cjolivier01 commented on issue #9858: softsign activation function

2018-02-22 Thread GitBox
cjolivier01 commented on issue #9858: softsign activation function
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/9858#issuecomment-367818944
 
 
   probably this discussion should occur on dev and see what the mentors think
   
   On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Marco de Abreu 
   wrote:
   
   > Of course, but we can't guarantee correctness due to lacking CI and we'd
   > have to make a formal release according to Apache in order to be able to
   > supply new binaries.
   >
   > ?
   > You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
   > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
   > 
,
   > or mute the thread
   > 

   > .
   >
   


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services


[GitHub] cjolivier01 commented on issue #9858: softsign activation function

2018-02-22 Thread GitBox
cjolivier01 commented on issue #9858: softsign activation function
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/9858#issuecomment-367813362
 
 
   Rules are nice, but IMHO, customer adoption right now trumps everything. 
Well, not EVERYHING, but it's important.


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services


[GitHub] cjolivier01 commented on issue #9858: softsign activation function

2018-02-22 Thread GitBox
cjolivier01 commented on issue #9858: softsign activation function
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/9858#issuecomment-367813362
 
 
   Rules are nice, but IMHO, customer adoption right now trumps everything


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services