[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] davids5 commented on issue #459: stm32h7: support SDRAM via FMC peripherial

2020-03-25 Thread GitBox
davids5 commented on issue #459: stm32h7: support SDRAM via FMC peripherial
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/459#issuecomment-603827257
 
 
   > > @anpaza could you refine your patchset a little bit? now the PR contain 
10 patches, and most patch fix the style issue. It's better that:
   > 
   > Never used rebase -i before, so it took a bit of time to read the 
internets :)
   > Now it looks a lot cleaner.
   > But davids5' branch nuttx-to-asf:stm32h7-fmc2_cs_fix should be broken now 
:)
   
   @anpaza Thank you!
   
   We do not need to be concerned with the stm32h7-fmc2_cs_fix branch.
   
   Please commit my suggestion and `rebase -i` one more time, the force push 
and we will merge this.


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services


[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] davids5 commented on issue #459: stm32h7: support SDRAM via FMC peripherial

2020-03-19 Thread GitBox
davids5 commented on issue #459: stm32h7: support SDRAM via FMC peripherial
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/459#issuecomment-601165084
 
 
   @anpaza - did you see my PR to your fork? Shal we get this in? See 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/459#pullrequestreview-376872337


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services


[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] davids5 commented on issue #459: stm32h7: support SDRAM via FMC peripherial

2020-03-16 Thread GitBox
davids5 commented on issue #459: stm32h7: support SDRAM via FMC peripherial
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/459#issuecomment-599784780
 
 
   @johannes-nivus Here is one thing that may make sense if @patacongo is 
onboard with it. There is the `excess ` control in Nxstyle.  What in h files we 
could have a comment in the title block (like vim settings. )  `excess=N` 
   
   Then we would not have to loose infomation in the right side comments.
   
   For for what you did above without loss of information it would be a ruler 
of 100 and have a tag of 
   * excess=80
   
   Thoughts?
   


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services


[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] davids5 commented on issue #459: stm32h7: support SDRAM via FMC peripherial

2020-03-11 Thread GitBox
davids5 commented on issue #459: stm32h7: support SDRAM via FMC peripherial
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/459#issuecomment-597614597
 
 
   @a
   
   > Do you mean:
   > a) The rulers in file stm32h7x3xx_rcc.h should be extended to cover the 
longest right-side comment
   > b) All the comments should be right-side of the respective #define
   > I can give one more try.
   
   Bravo!
   Yes. The way the file is on master, it only needed the blocks extended. 
   


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services


[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] davids5 commented on issue #459: stm32h7: support SDRAM via FMC peripherial

2020-03-11 Thread GitBox
davids5 commented on issue #459: stm32h7: support SDRAM via FMC peripherial
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/459#issuecomment-597608242
 
 
   @anpaza - Again I must apologizes to you for our poor tooling, and my 
inability to communicate the steps to fix it. 
   
   If it is OK with you , I will push a commit to this PR that will pass CI on 
the rcc file by changing the ruler. 
   
   The issue I have is is that I have several deadlines I have to meet and will 
not be abel to get to it right away. 
   
   The approach I will take is revert the rcc file and just add your code 
changes to it. Then lengthen the block comments. This why of fixing the file is 
100% OK in a arch .h file.
   
   The way I will push it is documented here:
   
https://help.github.com/en/github/collaborating-with-issues-and-pull-requests/committing-changes-to-a-pull-request-branch-created-from-a-fork


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services


[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] davids5 commented on issue #459: stm32h7: support SDRAM via FMC peripherial

2020-03-10 Thread GitBox
davids5 commented on issue #459: stm32h7: support SDRAM via FMC peripherial
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/459#issuecomment-597178908
 
 
   >If you tell me how, I can fix it myself.
   @anpaza See this commit
   b27e7d7
   
   @xiaoxiang781216 I left it up to the contributor @anpaza  and he said he 
would like to fix it. That is what I am waiting on. 
   
   


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services


[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] davids5 commented on issue #459: stm32h7: support SDRAM via FMC peripherial

2020-03-10 Thread GitBox
davids5 commented on issue #459: stm32h7: support SDRAM via FMC peripherial
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/459#issuecomment-597132496
 
 
   @johannes-nivus - not it was my mistake! 


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services


[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] davids5 commented on issue #459: stm32h7: support SDRAM via FMC peripherial

2020-03-10 Thread GitBox
davids5 commented on issue #459: stm32h7: support SDRAM via FMC peripherial
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/459#issuecomment-597119767
 
 
   >If you tell me how, I can fix it myself. 
   @anpaza See this commit
   
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/488/commits/b27e7d77491d64bb82fe598c90d83f50704961bd
   
   [line 
1](https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/488/commits/b27e7d77491d64bb82fe598c90d83f50704961bd#diff-83151d0c6d55ed69fbb71462fe8ae91cR1)
 extended the "Ruler", then all the block comment were extended to match.
   
   The fixed the [real 
error](https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/488/commits/b27e7d77491d64bb82fe598c90d83f50704961bd#diff-83151d0c6d55ed69fbb71462fe8ae91cR4)
   
   If you run checkpathc.sh on the before and after of that file. it will be 
come clear. But I MUST warn you, I has an off by 1 error on one line length and 
the output of the tools was all wrong. I wasted 40 minutes on that mess. So I 
feel your pain and very much appreciate your desire to fix the formatting.


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services


[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] davids5 commented on issue #459: stm32h7: support SDRAM via FMC peripherial

2020-03-10 Thread GitBox
davids5 commented on issue #459: stm32h7: support SDRAM via FMC peripherial
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/459#issuecomment-597105072
 
 
   > Why not be merciful and stop anpanza's suffering some way.
   
   I agree. @anpaza It id is Ok with you, when I have time this week or on the 
weekend I will pull it in and fix it. 


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services


[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] davids5 commented on issue #459: stm32h7: support SDRAM via FMC peripherial

2020-03-10 Thread GitBox
davids5 commented on issue #459: stm32h7: support SDRAM via FMC peripherial
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/459#issuecomment-597095946
 
 
   @patacongo nxstyle misled lead @anpaza to make make changes in the RCC file. 
I need to know if you will accept them or suggest he reverts the style changes 
to that file. 
   


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services


[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] davids5 commented on issue #459: stm32h7: support SDRAM via FMC peripherial

2020-03-10 Thread GitBox
davids5 commented on issue #459: stm32h7: support SDRAM via FMC peripherial
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/459#issuecomment-597092291
 
 
   @anpaza - I think the tools is wrong and flagged things it should not have. 
   
   @patacongo would you please advise @anpaza on the rcc file and if we can 
take it in as is?


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services


[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] davids5 commented on issue #459: stm32h7: support SDRAM via FMC peripherial

2020-03-10 Thread GitBox
davids5 commented on issue #459: stm32h7: support SDRAM via FMC peripherial
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/459#issuecomment-597073549
 
 
   @anpaza 
   
   > Should I fix someone else's warnings?
   
   I chose to. It makes the code better and in Eclipse with the error parers it 
is trivial. The set up is a bit tricky. I can share the screen shots here if 
you like/ 
   
   


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services


[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] davids5 commented on issue #459: stm32h7: support SDRAM via FMC peripherial

2020-03-07 Thread GitBox
davids5 commented on issue #459: stm32h7: support SDRAM via FMC peripherial
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/459#issuecomment-596096058
 
 
   @patacongo recognizing your are not failure with github. 
   
   There is a `suggested change` that was requested.  
   
I have asked you to use that feature and not waste time on adding comments 
that are not actionable when they can be. The contributor can then merge the 
suggestion and all our efforts add value not just criticism.  Once the review 
is done the contributor can squash and force push to remove all the bable 
commits. 
   
   This PR is waiting on that action by @anpaza 


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services