Re: [DISCUSS] About the details of JDK-8 support

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote: > Do you have any concern about this? I’ve not > tested with HBase yet. > We've been running JDK 8u60 in production with Hadoop 2.6.X and HBase for quite a while. Everything has been very stable for us. We're running and

Re: [DISCUSS] About the details of JDK-8 support

> > > On 7 Oct 2015, at 17:23, Andrew Wang wrote: > > > > We've been supporting JDK8 as a runtime for CDH5 for a while now (meaning > > the full stack including HBase), so I agree that we're good there. > > > > > with Kerberos on? > > Yea, I haven't been that involved

Build failed in Jenkins: Hadoop-common-trunk-Java8 #510

See Changes: [aajisaka] HADOOP-12465. Incorrect javadoc in WritableUtils.java. Contributed by [lei] HDFS-9176. Fix TestDirectoryScanner#testThrottling often fails. (Daniel [jing9] HDFS-9209. Erasure coding: Add apache

Re: DomainSocket issues on Solaris

On 07/10/15 18:53, Colin P. McCabe wrote: I think you could come up with a select/poll solution while using the old function signatures. A 4-byte int is more than enough information to pass in, given that you can use it as an index into a table in the C code. I have thought about that but a

Update BUILDING.txt instructions for Eclipse

Hi all, I happened to see this on the maven list, looks like the Maven eclipse plugin (aka "eclipse:eclipse") is being retired. Our BUILDING.txt still mentions running the "eclipse:eclipse" goal. Has anyone tried alternative ways of importing Hadoop into Eclipse? Seems like a good time to update

Build failed in Jenkins: Hadoop-common-trunk-Java8 #506

See Changes: [umamahesh] HDFS-9182. Cleanup the findbugs and other issues after HDFS EC merged to -- [...truncated 5671 lines...] Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time

Re: [DISCUSS] About the details of JDK-8 support

Thanks for clear summary, Tsuyoshi. I read some related past discussions. https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/MovingToJdk7and8 http://search-hadoop.com/m/uOzYtGSiCs1acRnh http://search-hadoop.com/m/uOzYthdWJqpGdSZ1 Though there seems to be no consensus about when to drop java 7 support yet,

Build failed in Jenkins: Hadoop-Common-trunk #1807

See Changes: [jing9] HDFS-9206. Inconsistent default value of [jing9] HDFS-9196. Fix TestWebHdfsContentLength. Contributed by Masatake [wheat9] HDFS-9170. Move libhdfs / fuse-dfs / libwebhdfs to hdfs-client.

Build failed in Jenkins: Hadoop-common-trunk-Java8 #507

See Changes: [jing9] HDFS-9206. Inconsistent default value of [jing9] HDFS-9196. Fix TestWebHdfsContentLength. Contributed by Masatake [wheat9] HDFS-9170. Move libhdfs / fuse-dfs / libwebhdfs to hdfs-client.

Jenkins build is back to normal : Hadoop-Common-trunk #1806

See

Build failed in Jenkins: Hadoop-common-trunk-Java8 #511

See Changes: [wang] HDFS-8632. Add InterfaceAudience annotation to the erasure coding -- [...truncated 5753 lines...] Running org.apache.hadoop.util.TestVersionUtil Tests run: 1,

Build failed in Jenkins: Hadoop-common-trunk-Java8 #512

See Changes: [yliu] HDFS-9137. DeadLock between DataNode#refreshVolumes and -- [...truncated 5745 lines...] Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.518 sec -

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7730) Allow TestCLI to be run against a cluster

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Konstantin Boudnik resolved HADOOP-7730. Resolution: Won't Fix Release Note: The resolution has been done in

Re: [DISCUSS] About the details of JDK-8 support

> On 7 Oct 2015, at 07:29, Masatake Iwasaki wrote: > > Thanks for clear summary, Tsuyoshi. > > I read some related past discussions. > > https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/MovingToJdk7and8 > http://search-hadoop.com/m/uOzYtGSiCs1acRnh >

Jenkins build is back to normal : Hadoop-Common-trunk #1808

See

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-12464) Interrupted client may try to fail-over and retry

Kihwal Lee created HADOOP-12464: --- Summary: Interrupted client may try to fail-over and retry Key: HADOOP-12464 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12464 Project: Hadoop Common

Re: DomainSocket issues on Solaris

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Alan Burlison wrote: > On 06/10/2015 10:52, Steve Loughran wrote: > >> HADOOP-11127, "Improve versioning and compatibility support in native >> library for downstream hadoop-common users." says "we need to do >> better here", which is

Re: Local repo sharing for maven builds

yetus-5 was just committed which does all of this (and more, of course). On Oct 6, 2015, at 2:35 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > >> On 5 Oct 2015, at 19:45, Colin McCabe wrote: >> >> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:52 AM, Steve Loughran

Re: [DISCUSS] About the details of JDK-8 support

We've been supporting JDK8 as a runtime for CDH5 for a while now (meaning the full stack including HBase), so I agree that we're good there. I'm against dropping JDK7 support though in branch-2. Even bumping dependency versions scares me, since it often leads to downstream pain. Any comment about

Re: Local repo sharing for maven builds

pls remove me from this group On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 8:26 PM, Steve Loughran wrote: > > > On 22 Sep 2015, at 12:16, Brahma Reddy Battula < > brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com> wrote: > > > > After using timestamped jars, hadoop-hdfs module might still continue to > use

Re: [DISCUSS] About the details of JDK-8 support

> On 7 Oct 2015, at 17:23, Andrew Wang wrote: > > We've been supporting JDK8 as a runtime for CDH5 for a while now (meaning > the full stack including HBase), so I agree that we're good there. > with Kerberos on? > I'm against dropping JDK7 support though in

Re: DomainSocket issues on Solaris

On 06/10/2015 10:52, Steve Loughran wrote: HADOOP-11127, "Improve versioning and compatibility support in native library for downstream hadoop-common users." says "we need to do better here", which is probably some way of packaging native libs. From that JIRA: Colin Patrick McCabe added a