Re: [DISCUSS] cull unused modules from under hadoop-tools

2022-04-07 Thread Sunil Govindan
hadoop-sls is used for perf tests. Thanks Sunil On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 11:57 AM Owen O'Malley wrote: > We really need input from the users as well. In trunk, hadoop-ozone and > hadoop-ant are already gone. > > Used: > hadoop-aliyun > hadoop-aws > hadoop-distcp > hadoop-azure-datalake > hadoop-a

Re: [DISCUSS] cull unused modules from under hadoop-tools

2022-04-07 Thread Owen O'Malley
We really need input from the users as well. In trunk, hadoop-ozone and hadoop-ant are already gone. Used: hadoop-aliyun hadoop-aws hadoop-distcp hadoop-azure-datalake hadoop-azure hadoop-dynamometer hadoop-federation-balance Questions: hadoop-archive-logs hadoop-archives hadoop-datajoin hadoop-e

Re: [DISCUSS] cull unused modules from under hadoop-tools

2022-04-07 Thread Ayush Saxena
Attic will not take this or will be very painfull for us, they in general take the entire project. Had a word with infra folks as well, we can probably move them under a seperate repo under hadoop and then archive it. Depandabot and such don’t scan archived repos. This should also solve our pour

Re: [DISCUSS] cull unused modules from under hadoop-tools

2022-04-07 Thread Steve Loughran
do that and we still have to worry about CVEs, dynabot complaints etc, build breaking changes. I am being more ruthless: can we move these into some attic repo. On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 at 09:39, Vinayakumar B wrote: > Can move unused ones to separate repo under hadoop, and introduce a > separate ind

Re: [DISCUSS] cull unused modules from under hadoop-tools

2022-04-07 Thread Steve Loughran
hey, we aren't to touch distcp. everyone uses that. good to know of the other two On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 at 09:01, Ayush Saxena wrote: > Distcp (I have a use case for it) > Hadoop-federation-balance(RBF uses it, we will take care in case it > bothers) > Hadoop-Dynamometer(This I feel is being used

Re: [DISCUSS] cull unused modules from under hadoop-tools

2022-04-01 Thread Vinayakumar B
Can move unused ones to separate repo under hadoop, and introduce a separate independent release cycle in case required. Any thoughts on this? -Vinay On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 at 1:31 PM, Ayush Saxena wrote: > Distcp (I have a use case for it) > Hadoop-federation-balance(RBF uses it, we will take care

Re: [DISCUSS] cull unused modules from under hadoop-tools

2022-04-01 Thread Ayush Saxena
Distcp (I have a use case for it) Hadoop-federation-balance(RBF uses it, we will take care in case it bothers) Hadoop-Dynamometer(This I feel is being used from jira activies) So, these three we should let stay as is. Others the object store ones are active. You know which all are needed. For rest

[DISCUSS] cull unused modules from under hadoop-tools

2022-03-31 Thread Steve Loughran
how many of the modules under hadoop-tools get used/maintained? hadoop-aliyun hadoop-ant hadoop-archive-logs hadoop-archives hadoop-aws hadoop-azure hadoop-azure-datalake hadoop-datajoin hadoop-distcp hadoop-dynamometer hadoop-extras hadoop-federation-balance hadoop-fs2img hadoop-ftp hadoop-gridm