Yea, unfortunately I'd say backburner it. This would have been perfect
during alpha.
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> I'd refer to it as an incompatible change; we expressly label the
> annotations as IA.Public.
>
> If you think it's too late to get in for 3.0, I can make a
I'd refer to it as an incompatible change; we expressly label the
annotations as IA.Public.
If you think it's too late to get in for 3.0, I can make a jira and put it
on the back burner for when trunk goes to 4.0?
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Andrew Wang
wrote:
> Is this itself an incompat
Is this itself an incompatible change? I imagine the bytecode will be
different.
I think we're too late to do this for beta1 given that I want to cut an RC0
today.
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 7:03 AM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> When Apache Yetus formed, it started with several key pieces of Hadoop that
>
When Apache Yetus formed, it started with several key pieces of Hadoop that
looked reusable. In addition to our contribution testing infra, the project
also stood up a version of our audience annotations for delineating the
public facing API[1].
I recently got the Apache HBase community onto the Y
