Re: [VOTE] 0.20.205.0 Release Candidate 2

2011-10-14 Thread Scott Bush
+1 (non binding) No blocking issues found in Yahoo QE regression testing. Performance testing showed no performance regression when compared with 204. Scott sb...@yahoo-inc.com On 10/12/11 12:18 PM, Arpit Gupta ar...@hortonworks.com wrote: Deployed to a cluster of 20 servers, with security

Re: [VOTE] 0.20.205.0 Release Candidate 2

2011-10-14 Thread Matt Foley
The vote has closed, with the following tally (including my own non-binding +1): +1 binding: 4 +1 non-binding: 6 -1 binding: 0 -1 non-binding: 0 The vote passes, ten to zero, with four PMC members voting in favor. We have a 0.20.205.0 release, with both security and

Re: [VOTE] 0.20.205.0 Release Candidate 2

2011-10-13 Thread Tom White
+1 Checksums and signatures were OK. I also ran an API compatibility check (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7035, https://github.com/tomwhite/hadoop-compatibility-tools) and it passed. There were three errors, all false positives: Class org.apache.hadoop.fs.HarFileSystem E1.2 -

Re: [VOTE] 0.20.205.0 Release Candidate 2

2011-10-13 Thread Arun C Murthy
+1 Downloaded release, verified checksums and ran a single node cluster. Arun On Oct 7, 2011, at 5:10 PM, Matt Foley wrote: Many thanks to the community members who tried out RC1, and found several critical or blocker bugs. These have been resolved and I have now posted RC2 at

Re: [VOTE] 0.20.205.0 Release Candidate 2

2011-10-13 Thread Aaron T. Myers
+1 (non-binding) I downloaded the tar ball and deployed on a 6 node cluster with security disabled. I put a few files and ran a few MR jobs, mostly to calculate the value of Pi. All worked fine. Curiously, the estimated value of Pi was once determined to be 4., but I suspect

Re: [VOTE] 0.20.205.0 Release Candidate 2

2011-10-13 Thread Mahadev Konar
+1. Downloaded the bits, set up a single node cluster and ran example jobs. Works fine. thanks mahadev On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Aaron T. Myers a...@cloudera.com wrote: +1 (non-binding) I downloaded the tar ball and deployed on a 6 node cluster with security disabled. I put a few

Re: [VOTE] 0.20.205.0 Release Candidate 2

2011-10-13 Thread Eric Yang
+1 (non-binding) Exercised Hadoop 0.20.205 with HBase 0.90.4+, Pig 0.9.1+, Chukwa trunk on 20 nodes clusters, works fine. regards, Eric On Oct 13, 2011, at 5:46 PM, Aaron T. Myers wrote: +1 (non-binding) I downloaded the tar ball and deployed on a 6 node cluster with security disabled. I

Re: [VOTE] 0.20.205.0 Release Candidate 2

2011-10-13 Thread Ramya Sunil
+1 (non binding) Deployed on a single node and a 20node cluster with security turned on and off. Ran Hadoop benchmarks, a few end-end tests and functional tests covering distributed cache, capacity scheduler, decommissioning etc Also ran end-end tests on Pig 0.9.x and a few system tests on Hbase

Re: [VOTE] 0.20.205.0 Release Candidate 2

2011-10-12 Thread Arpit Gupta
Deployed to a cluster of 20 servers, with security and append features enabled. Passed our internal test suite. Looks good! +1 (non binding) -- Arpit ar...@hortonworks.com On Oct 7, 2011, at 5:10 PM, Matt Foley wrote: Many thanks to the community members who tried out RC1, and found

Re: [VOTE] 0.20.205.0 Release Candidate 2

2011-10-12 Thread Jitendra Pandey
I deployed on 5 node cluster with security turned on and ran mapreduce jobs. Verified md5 signature of the rpm. +1. On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Matt Foley ma...@apache.org wrote: Many thanks to the community members who tried out RC1, and found several critical or blocker bugs. These

[VOTE] 0.20.205.0 Release Candidate 2

2011-10-07 Thread Matt Foley
Many thanks to the community members who tried out RC1, and found several critical or blocker bugs. These have been resolved and I have now posted RC2 at http://people.apache.org/~mattf/hadoop-0.20.205.0-rc2/ A copy of the Release Notes are provided at the top level of that directory. Appropriate