The port of HADOOP-8887 to branch-2 fails the build. Please kindly see
attached.
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Hi Andrew,
It seems that your attachment did not appear on the mailing list.
I'm taking a look at the branch-2 build presently.
Colin
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote:
The port of HADOOP-8887 to branch-2 fails the build. Please kindly see
attached
Purtell apurt...@apache.org
wrote:
The port of HADOOP-8887 to branch-2 fails the build. Please kindly see
attached.
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy
on the mailing list.
I'm taking a look at the branch-2 build presently.
Colin
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org
wrote:
The port of HADOOP-8887 to branch-2 fails the build. Please kindly see
attached.
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack
, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org
wrote:
The port of HADOOP-8887 to branch-2 fails the build. Please kindly see
attached.
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
Hein
(via Tom White
presently.
Colin
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org
wrote:
The port of HADOOP-8887 to branch-2 fails the build. Please kindly
see
attached.
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back
The build would fail in the site phase for me for some reason because of
a missing dependency management section. Adding dev-support as parent to
the new module fixed that.
On Thursday, October 18, 2012, Colin McCabe wrote:
Hmm. It did build for me (in the sense of completing successfully,
site? let me check that, I may have missed that in my second attempt, oops!
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote:
The build would fail in the site phase for me for some reason because of
a missing dependency management section. Adding dev-support as parent