Re: Jenkins Node Labelling Documentation

2016-08-14 Thread Gav
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 8:45 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > Somehow I missed this note. > > Would it be possible to remove Ubuntu instead of ubuntu? It looks like > more jobs use ubuntu: https://builds.apache.org/label/ubuntu/ vs https:// > builds.apache.org/label/Ubuntu/ >

Re: Jenkins Node Labelling Documentation

2016-08-14 Thread John D. Ament
Somehow I missed this note. Would it be possible to remove Ubuntu instead of ubuntu? It looks like more jobs use ubuntu: https://builds.apache.org/label/ubuntu/ vs https://builds.apache.org/label/Ubuntu/ John On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 5:18 AM Gav wrote: > Hi All, > >

Re: Jenkins Node Labelling Documentation

2016-08-14 Thread Gav
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: > I'm trying to transition jobs off of the yahoo-not-h2 label, but again > I don't see a single label I can use that covers an appropriate set of > nodes. > > Can we expand Hadoop to include H10 and H11? No > Can we come

Re: Jenkins Node Labelling Documentation

2016-08-08 Thread Sean Busbey
I'm trying to transition jobs off of the yahoo-not-h2 label, but again I don't see a single label I can use that covers an appropriate set of nodes. Can we expand Hadoop to include H10 and H11? Can we come up with a label that covers both the H* and the physical ubuntu hosts that have been

Re: Jenkins Node Labelling Documentation

2016-08-04 Thread Gav
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 7:52 AM, Sean Busbey wrote: > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Gav wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Sean Busbey wrote: > >> > >> > Why? yahoo-not-h2 is really not required since H2 is the

Re: Jenkins Node Labelling Documentation

2016-08-04 Thread Sean Busbey
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Gav wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Sean Busbey wrote: >> >> > Why? yahoo-not-h2 is really not required since H2 is the same as all the >> > other H* nodes. >> >> The yahoo-not-h2 label exists because the H2

Re: Jenkins Node Labelling Documentation

2016-08-04 Thread Gav
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 7:28 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > fwiw, I think the docker label should remain - the Rackspace dynamically > provisioned agents, for example, are too small to really be a good option > for most, if not all, jobs that use Docker. *shrug* > Too small

Re: Jenkins Node Labelling Documentation

2016-08-04 Thread Andrew Bayer
fwiw, I think the docker label should remain - the Rackspace dynamically provisioned agents, for example, are too small to really be a good option for most, if not all, jobs that use Docker. *shrug* Alternatively, a label that distinguishes between the-same-in-configuration physical vs

Re: Jenkins Node Labelling Documentation

2016-08-04 Thread Gav
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Sean Busbey wrote: > > Why? yahoo-not-h2 is really not required since H2 is the same as all the > other H* nodes. > > The yahoo-not-h2 label exists because the H2 node was misconfigured > for a long time and would fail builds as a result.

Re: Jenkins Node Labelling Documentation

2016-08-04 Thread Sean Busbey
> Why? yahoo-not-h2 is really not required since H2 is the same as all the > other H* nodes. The yahoo-not-h2 label exists because the H2 node was misconfigured for a long time and would fail builds as a result. What label will jobs taht are currently configured to avoid H2 be migrated to? Will

Jenkins Node Labelling Documentation

2016-08-04 Thread Gav
Hi All, Following on from my earlier mails regarding Java, Maven and Ant consolidations, I thought you might like a page detailing the Jenkins Labels and which nodes they belong to. I've put it up here :- https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Jenkins+node+labels I hope you find it