See https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/908/changes
Changes:
[acmurthy] MAPREDUCE-5551. Fix compat with hadoop-1 in
SequenceFileAsBinaryOutputFormat.WritableValueBytes by re-introducing missing
constructors. Contributed by Zhijie Shen.
[vinodkv] YARN-1070. Fixed race conditions
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steve Loughran resolved HADOOP-7838.
Resolution: Duplicate
resolving as duplicate of HDFS-3165 (technically that duplicates
Arpit Gupta created HADOOP-10012:
Summary: Secure Oozie jobs with delegation token renewal exception
in HA setup
Key: HADOOP-10012
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10012
Project:
Guys,
I took a look at the content in 2.1.2-beta so far, other than the critical
fixes such as HADOOP-9984 (symlinks) and few others in YARN/MR, there is fairly
little content (unit tests fixes etc.)
Furthermore, it's standing up well in testing too. Plus, the protocols look
good for now (I
Arun,
Does this mean that you want to skip a beta release and go straight to GA
with the next release?
thx
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Guys,
I took a look at the content in 2.1.2-beta so far, other than the
critical fixes such as HADOOP-9984
(This time copying all the lists)
I am +1 for naming the new branch 2.2.0.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Guys,
I took a look at the content in 2.1.2-beta so far, other than the
critical fixes such as HADOOP-9984 (symlinks) and few others in
+1. We should get an RC as soon as possible so that we can get all the
downstream components to sign off. The earlier the better.
Thanks,
+Vinod
On Oct 1, 2013, at 4:15 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
Guys,
I took a look at the content in 2.1.2-beta so far, other than the critical
fixes such as
+1 for naming the new branch 2.2.0
sanjay
On Oct 1, 2013, at 4:55 PM, Suresh Srinivas wrote:
(This time copying all the lists)
I am +1 for naming the new branch 2.2.0.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Guys,
I took a look at the content in
+1
Makes good sense.
Jagane
-Original Message-
From: Arun C Murthy [mailto:a...@hortonworks.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 4:15 PM
To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org;
yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: 2.1.2 (Was: Re:
HADOOP-9984 is going to break interface compatibility for out-of-tree
FileSystems. It'd also be good to let downstream components do some testing
before GA.
Thanks,
Andrew
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Jagane Sundar jag...@sundar.org wrote:
+1
Makes good sense.
Jagane
-Original
**
**
Folks,
* *
At SoCC'13 (Symposium on Cloud Computinghttp://www.socc2013.org/home/program)
conference, the first paper on YARN was published and it has been awarded
the best paper. Congratulations to all the authors as well as the
extended YARN team who are helping make the project a
That is awesome!
Congrats dudes this is great!! Please consider submitting an expanded
version of the paper to J. Big Data from Springer:
http://journalofbigdata.com/
As one of the Editorial Board, I would sincerely welcome your contribution!
Cheers,
Chris
Congratulations
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
That is awesome!
Congrats dudes this is great!! Please consider submitting an expanded
version of the paper to J. Big Data from Springer:
http://journalofbigdata.com/
As
Yes, sorry if it wasn't clear.
As others seem to agree, I think we'll be better getting a protocol/api stable
GA done and then iterating on bugs etc.
I'm not super worried about HADOOP-9984 since symlinks just made it to
branch-2.1 recently.
Currently we only have 2 blockers: HADOOP-9984
Agree with Aaron. Let's move this discussion to security@. Thanks.
On Sep 30, 2013, at 5:57 PM, Aaron T. Myers a...@apache.org wrote:
I strongly recommend that we take this conversation over to the
(committers-only) secur...@hadoop.apache.org mailing list. In general we
try to follow the
15 matches
Mail list logo