Re: [DISCUSS] project for pre-commit patch testing (was Re: upstream jenkins build broken?)

2015-06-16 Thread Kengo Seki
+1. From its user's viewpoint, recent improvements on test-patch made my work really efficient. For example, quick feedback due to avoiding unnecessary tests, automated build environment setup due to Docker support, automated patch download from JIRA, automated shellcheck and whitespace checker,

Re: Protocol Buffers version

2015-06-16 Thread Allen Wittenauer
On Jun 16, 2015, at 2:54 AM, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com wrote: One reason at least: PB 2.5.0 has no support for Solaris SPARC. 2.6.1 does. to be ruthless, that's not enough reason to upgrade branch-2, due to the transitive pain it makes all the way down. Not in

Re: [DISCUSS] project for pre-commit patch testing (was Re: upstream jenkins build broken?)

2015-06-16 Thread Nick Dimiduk
I think this is a great idea! Having just gone through the process of getting Phoenix up to speed with precommits, it would be really nice to have a place to go other than fork/hack someone else's work. For the same project, I recently integrated its first daemon service. This meant adding a bunch

Re: [DISCUSS] project for pre-commit patch testing (was Re: upstream jenkins build broken?)

2015-06-16 Thread Tsuyoshi Ozawa
+1 on the idea. It would be great if tests about dependency management. multiple branches, and distributed environment can be done in the project. One discussion point is how Hadoop depends on Yetus, including the development cycles. It's a good time to rethink what's can be done for making

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-12093) test-patch findbugs fails on a branch-based pre-commit runs

2015-06-16 Thread Sangjin Lee (JIRA)
Sangjin Lee created HADOOP-12093: Summary: test-patch findbugs fails on a branch-based pre-commit runs Key: HADOOP-12093 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12093 Project: Hadoop Common

Re: [DISCUSS] project for pre-commit patch testing (was Re: upstream jenkins build broken?)

2015-06-16 Thread Allen Wittenauer
Since a couple of people have brought it up: I think the release question is probably one of the big question marks. Other than tar balls, how does something like this actually get used downstream? For test-patch, in particular, I have a few thoughts on this: Short term:

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-12094) TestCount Fails

2015-06-16 Thread Akira AJISAKA (JIRA)
Akira AJISAKA created HADOOP-12094: -- Summary: TestCount Fails Key: HADOOP-12094 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12094 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-12094) TestCount fails

2015-06-16 Thread Akira AJISAKA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Akira AJISAKA resolved HADOOP-12094. Resolution: Duplicate TestCount fails --- Key:

Re: [DISCUSS] project for pre-commit patch testing (was Re: upstream jenkins build broken?)

2015-06-16 Thread Steve Loughran
I think it's good to have a general build/test process projects can share, so +1 to pulling it out. You should get help from others. regarding incubation, it is a lot of work, especially for something that's more of an in-house tool than an artifact to release and redistribute. You can't just

Re: [DISCUSS] project for pre-commit patch testing (was Re: upstream jenkins build broken?)

2015-06-16 Thread Sean Busbey
I'm going to try responding to several things at once here, so apologies if I miss anyone and sorry for the long email. :) On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com wrote: I think it's good to have a general build/test process projects can share, so +1 to pulling

Re: [DISCUSS] project for pre-commit patch testing (was Re: upstream jenkins build broken?)

2015-06-16 Thread Chris Douglas
+1 A separate project sounds great. It'd be great to have more standard tooling across the ecosystem. As a practical matter, how should projects consume releases? -C On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Sean Busbey bus...@cloudera.com wrote: Oof. I had meant to push on this again but life got in

Re: Apache Hadoop 2.7 Windows 7 x64 - Failing Tests TestKerberosAuthenticator

2015-06-16 Thread Neeraj Vaidya
Hi All, I just cleared the kerberos tickets cached on my machine using klist purge, before starting the build. This solved the issue for me. Hope that helps anyone else facing a similar issue. Regards, Neeraj On Tue, 16/6/15, Neeraj Vaidya

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-12091) Issues with directories handling

2015-06-16 Thread Gil Vernik (JIRA)
Gil Vernik created HADOOP-12091: --- Summary: Issues with directories handling Key: HADOOP-12091 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12091 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type:

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-12092) Issues with sub-directories in Swift

2015-06-16 Thread Gil Vernik (JIRA)
Gil Vernik created HADOOP-12092: --- Summary: Issues with sub-directories in Swift Key: HADOOP-12092 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12092 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type:

Build failed in Jenkins: Hadoop-Common-trunk #1528

2015-06-16 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/1528/changes Changes: [arp] HDFS-8607. TestFileCorruption doesn't work as expected. (Contributed by Walter Su) [vinodkv] HADOOP-12001. Fixed LdapGroupsMapping to include configurable Posix UID and GID attributes during the search.

Build failed in Jenkins: Hadoop-common-trunk-Java8 #230

2015-06-16 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-common-trunk-Java8/230/changes Changes: [arp] HDFS-8607. TestFileCorruption doesn't work as expected. (Contributed by Walter Su) [vinodkv] HADOOP-12001. Fixed LdapGroupsMapping to include configurable Posix UID and GID attributes during the search.

Re: Maven always detects changes - Is this a Docker 'feature'?

2015-06-16 Thread Steve Loughran
Your clocks are probably confused. ant -diagnostics actually measures clock drift between System.currentTimeMillis() and the timestamps coming off the tmp dir. You should do the same with files touched in target/ On 15 Jun 2015, at 23:31, Colin P. McCabe cmcc...@apache.org wrote: Hi

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-12091) Issues with directories handling in Swift

2015-06-16 Thread Steve Loughran (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Loughran resolved HADOOP-12091. - Resolution: Duplicate Issues with directories handling in Swift

Re: Protocol Buffers version

2015-06-16 Thread Steve Loughran
On 15 Jun 2015, at 22:31, Colin P. McCabe cmcc...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Allen Wittenauer a...@altiscale.com wrote: On Jun 12, 2015, at 1:03 PM, Alan Burlison alan.burli...@oracle.com wrote: On 14/05/2015 18:41, Chris Nauroth wrote: As a reminder though,

Re: What is the limit to the number of properties set in the configuration object

2015-06-16 Thread Steve Loughran
they also get sent over the wire with things like job submissions, so can make things slower. in my little grumpy project, https://github.com/steveloughran/grumpy , I actually stuck the groovy scripts into the config files as strings, so they'd be submitted as jobs; the mapper reducer would