Apache Hadoop qbt Report: branch2+JDK7 on Linux/x86

2019-11-15 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
For more details, see https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch2-java7-linux-x86/507/ [Nov 15, 2019 4:50:51 AM] (weichiu) HDFS-14884. Add sanity check that zone key equals feinfo key while [Nov 15, 2019 4:53:39 AM] (aajisaka) HADOOP-15097.

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16714) Hadoop website does not mention 2.8.5 release

2019-11-15 Thread Wei-Chiu Chuang (Jira)
Wei-Chiu Chuang created HADOOP-16714: Summary: Hadoop website does not mention 2.8.5 release Key: HADOOP-16714 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16714 Project: Hadoop Common

Re: dependabot branch in git repo

2019-11-15 Thread Jonathan Eagles
I'm trying to understand how github was able to push branches in our https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop.git repository. Perhaps the feature is turned on in github and then commit-back to gitbox? It is interesting, but also circumvents our process as we know it.

Re: dependabot branch in git repo

2019-11-15 Thread Wei-Chiu Chuang
This? https://github.com/marketplace/dependabot-preview New feature of GitHub. Looks handy to me. I wish it was more intelligent though. On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 12:21 PM Jonathan Eagles wrote: > Does anyone have information on the dependabot branches that are getting > created in the hadoop and

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove Ozone and Submarine from Hadoop repo

2019-11-15 Thread Dinesh Chitlangia
Ozone code has now been removed from Hadoop trunk via https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16654 Thanks Sandeep Nemuri for the contribution. -Dinesh On 2019/10/28 16:50:04, Anu Engineer wrote: > @Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli > Do we need a separate vote thread for this? there are

dependabot branch in git repo

2019-11-15 Thread Jonathan Eagles
Does anyone have information on the dependabot branches that are getting created in the hadoop and other repos? Seems to be some artifact of github. Jon Eagles Tez PMC Chair

Re: [DISCUSS] Making 2.10 the last minor 2.x release

2019-11-15 Thread Wangda Tan
+1, thanks Jonathan for bringing this up! On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 11:41 AM epa...@apache.org wrote: > Thanks Jonathan for opening the discussion. > > I am not in favor of this proposal. 2.10 was very recently released, and > moving to 2.10 will take some time for the community. It seems

Re: [DISCUSS] Making 2.10 the last minor 2.x release

2019-11-15 Thread epa...@apache.org
Thanks Jonathan for opening the discussion. I am not in favor of this proposal. 2.10 was very recently released, and moving to 2.10 will take some time for the community. It seems premature to make a decision at this point that there will never be a need for a 2.11 release. -Eric On

Re: [DISCUSS] Making 2.10 the last minor 2.x release

2019-11-15 Thread Erik Krogen
I'm in support of this. The current scheme is confusing, and as you mentioned, is making the backport strategy less clear. It reminds me of the branch-2.8 vs. branch-2 (destined for 2.9) days when various fixes would make it into one or the other. One other action item would be to do a quick

Apache Hadoop qbt Report: branch2+JDK7 on Linux/x86

2019-11-15 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
For more details, see https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch2-java7-linux-x86/506/ [Nov 14, 2019 10:44:30 PM] (jhung) YARN-7739. DefaultAMSProcessor should properly check customized resource [Nov 14, 2019 10:56:23 PM] (jhung) YARN-7541. Node updates don't update the maximum cluster

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16713) Use PathCapabilities for default configuring append mode for RollingFileSystemSink

2019-11-15 Thread Adam Antal (Jira)
Adam Antal created HADOOP-16713: --- Summary: Use PathCapabilities for default configuring append mode for RollingFileSystemSink Key: HADOOP-16713 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16713