[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-19010) NullPointerException in Hadoop Credential Check CLI Command

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-19010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vinayakumar B resolved HADOOP-19010. Fix Version/s: 3.4.0 Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Resolution: Fixed

[ANNOUNCE] New Hadoop PMC member - Mukund Thakur

and welcome, Mukund ! -Vinayakumar B -- -Vinay

Re: [DISCUSS] cull unused modules from under hadoop-tools

Can move unused ones to separate repo under hadoop, and introduce a separate independent release cycle in case required. Any thoughts on this? -Vinay On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 at 1:31 PM, Ayush Saxena wrote: > Distcp (I have a use case for it) > Hadoop-federation-balance(RBF uses it, we will take

Re: [DISCUSS] Race condition in ProtobufRpcEngine2

Call.toString() was used only while sending the response, in the response processor thread. At this point, header would be already read and processed. So no chance of race conditions. This race condition was not introduced by the HADOOP-17046 ,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.3.1 RC3

+1 (Binding) 1. Built from Tag. 2. Successful Native Build on Ubuntu 20.04 3. Verified Checksums 4. Deployed the docker cluster with 3 nodes 5. Ran sample MR Jobs -Vinay On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 6:40 PM Ayush Saxena wrote: > +1, > Built from Source. > Successful Native Build on Ubuntu 20.04 >

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3.3.1 release

Hi David, >> Still hoping for help here: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790 I will raise a PR for the said solution soon (in a day or two). -Vinay On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 5:39 AM, David wrote: > Hello, > > Still hoping for help here: > >

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-17505) public interface GroupMappingServiceProvider needs default impl for getGroupsSet()

Vinayakumar B created HADOOP-17505: -- Summary: public interface GroupMappingServiceProvider needs default impl for getGroupsSet() Key: HADOOP-17505 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17505

Re: Wire compatibility between Hadoop 3.x client and 2.x server

iled jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15660 for details > > > 2020年10月28日 17:08，Vinayakumar B 写道： > > Hi Wu,Jianliang, > Have you created the Jira for the issue you mentioned due to > getContentSummary? > > I might have a fix for this. Of-course it needs t

Re: Wire compatibility between Hadoop 3.x client and 2.x server

Hi Wu,Jianliang, Have you created the Jira for the issue you mentioned due to getContentSummary? I might have a fix for this. Of-course it needs to be applied both client and server side. Let me know. -Vinay On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 12:26 PM Wu,Jianliang(vip.com) < jianliang...@vipshop.com>

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-17306) RawLocalFileSystem's lastModifiedTime() looses milli seconds in JDK < 10.b09

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vinayakumar B resolved HADOOP-17306. Fix Version/s: 3.4.0 3.3.1 3.2.2 Hadoop Flags

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-17306) RawLocalFileSystem's lastModifiedTime() looses milli seconds in JDK < 10 b09

Vinayakumar B created HADOOP-17306: -- Summary: RawLocalFileSystem's lastModifiedTime() looses milli seconds in JDK < 10 b09 Key: HADOOP-17306 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-17278) Shade guava 29.0-jre in hadoop thirdparty

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vinayakumar B resolved HADOOP-17278. Fix Version/s: thirdparty-1.1.0 Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Resolution: Fixed

Re: [VOTE] Moving Ozone to a separated Apache project

+1 -Vinay On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 at 6:22 PM, Lin, Yiqun wrote: > +1. > > > > Thanks, > > Yiqun > > > > On 2020/9/25, 2:08 PM, "Elek, Marton" wrote: > > > > External Email > > > > Hi all, > > > > Thank you for all the feedback and requests, > > > > As we discussed in the previous

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.10.1 (RC0)

Apologies for delayed voting. +1 (Binding) 1. Verified the signature. Signatures are good. 2. Verified the sha512 checksum (I tried to use the sha512sum tool to verify. But ".sha512" files doesn't have the expected format. I guess these files are regenerated using "gpg --print-md",

[ANNOUNCE] New Apache Hadoop PMC member : Ayush Saxena

Hi all, I am very glad to announce that Ayush Saxena was voted to join Apache Hadoop PMC. Congratulations Ayush! Well deserved and thank you for your dedication to the project. Please keep up the good work. Thanks, -Vinay

[ANNOUNCE] New Apache Hadoop PMC member : Ayush Saxena

Hi all, I am very glad to announce that Ayush Saxena was voted to join Apache Hadoop PMC. Congratulations Ayush! Well deserved and thank you for your dedication to the project. Please keep up the good work. Thanks, -Vinay

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.3.0 - RC0

+1 (Binding) -Verified all checksums and Signatures. -Verified site, Release notes and Change logs + May be changelog and release notes could be grouped based on the project at second level for better look (this needs to be supported from yetus) -Tested in x86 local 3-node docker cluster. +

Re: [NOTICE] Removal of protobuf classes from Hadoop Token's public APIs' signature

rotocolPB/StorageContainerLocationProtocolClientSideTranslatorPB.java:[116,47] > > incompatible types: com.google.protobuf.ServiceException cannot be > > converted to org.apache.hadoop.thirdparty.protobuf.ServiceException > > 17:01:19 2020/04/16 00:01:19 INFO: [INFO] 2 errors > > > > > > There's anoth

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-17046) Support downstreams' existing Hadoop-rpc implementations using non-shaded protobuf classes.

Vinayakumar B created HADOOP-17046: -- Summary: Support downstreams' existing Hadoop-rpc implementations using non-shaded protobuf classes. Key: HADOOP-17046 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17046

Re: [DISCUSS] making Ozone a separate Apache project

+1 -Vinay On Thu, 14 May 2020, 12:20 pm Surendra Singh Lilhore, < surendralilh...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > -Surendra > > > On Thu, 14 May, 2020, 9:30 am yisheng lien, wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Thank you Marton for the detailed description. > > > > > > Wanqiang Ji 於 2020年5月14日 週四 上午11:27 寫道： >

Re: [NOTICE] Removal of protobuf classes from Hadoop Token's public APIs' signature

ier. > > Other downstreamers that break with the relocated protobuf include: Ozone > and HBase. but neither of them use the removed Token API. > > > On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 4:40 AM Vinayakumar B > wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >>This mail

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-16985) Handle release package related issues

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vinayakumar B resolved HADOOP-16985. Fix Version/s: 3.3.0 Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Resolution: Fixed Committed

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16985) Handle release package related issues

Vinayakumar B created HADOOP-16985: -- Summary: Handle release package related issues Key: HADOOP-16985 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16985 Project: Hadoop Common Issue

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-16927) Update hadoop-thirdparty dependency version to 1.0.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vinayakumar B resolved HADOOP-16927. Fix Version/s: 3.3.0 Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Resolution: Fixed Committed

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop Thirdparty 1.0.0 - RC1

Thanks brahma. So total 5 +1s (4 binding, 1 non-binding). Done with pushing bits. Should get mirrored in next 24 hours. -Vinay On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 12:55 AM Brahma Reddy Battula wrote: > > My late +1.. I missed this.. > > > On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 at 12:43 AM, Vinayak

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16927) Update hadoop-thirdparty dependency version to 1.0.0

Vinayakumar B created HADOOP-16927: -- Summary: Update hadoop-thirdparty dependency version to 1.0.0 Key: HADOOP-16927 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16927 Project: Hadoop Common

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop Thirdparty 1.0.0 - RC1

trunk with hadoop-thirdparty 1.0.0 >> - Checked rat files and documents >> - Checked LICENSE and NOTICE files >> >> Thanks, >> Akira >> >> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 5:26 AM Vinayakumar B >> wrote: >> >> > Hi folks, >> &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3.3.0 Release include ARM binary

Making ARM artifact optional, makes the release process simpler for RM and unblocks release process (if there is unavailability of ARM resources). Still there are possible options to collaborate with RM ( as brahma mentioned earlier) and provide ARM artifact may be before or after vote. If

[VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop Thirdparty 1.0.0 - RC1

Hi folks, Thanks to everyone's help on this release. I have re-created a release candidate (RC1) for Apache Hadoop Thirdparty 1.0.0. RC Release artifacts are available at : http://home.apache.org/~vinayakumarb/release/hadoop-thirdparty-1.0.0-RC1/ Maven artifacts are available in staging

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop Thirdparty 1.0.0

checksums and tried building from source. > Everything seems to be working fine. > But I feel the concerns regarding licences are valid. > IMO we should fix them and include HADOOP-16895 too in the release > > -Ayush > > > On 29-Feb-2020, at 1:45 AM, Vinayakumar B > wrote

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-16919) [thirdparty] Handle release package related issues

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vinayakumar B resolved HADOOP-16919. Fix Version/s: thirdparty-1.0.0 Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Resolution: Fixed

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-16895) [thirdparty] Revisit LICENSEs and NOTICEs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vinayakumar B resolved HADOOP-16895. Fix Version/s: thirdparty-1.0.0 Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Resolution: Fixed

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16919) [thirdparty] Handle release package related issues

Vinayakumar B created HADOOP-16919: -- Summary: [thirdparty] Handle release package related issues Key: HADOOP-16919 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16919 Project: Hadoop Common

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop Thirdparty 1.0.0

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16895 jira created for handling LICENCE and NOTICEs PR also has been raised for a proposal. Please validate https://github.com/apache/hadoop-thirdparty/pull/6 -Vinay On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 11:48 PM Vinayakumar B wrote: > Thanks Elek for detai

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16895) [thirdparty] Revisit LICENSEs and NOTICEs

Vinayakumar B created HADOOP-16895: -- Summary: [thirdparty] Revisit LICENSEs and NOTICEs Key: HADOOP-16895 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16895 Project: Hadoop Common

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop Thirdparty 1.0.0

> > ps: I am not experienced with licensing enough to judge which one of > these are blocking and I might be wrong. > > IMO, none of these should be blocking and can be handled before next release. Still if someone feels this should be fixed and RC should be cut again, I am open to it.

[VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop Thirdparty 1.0.0

Hi folks, Thanks to everyone's help on this release. I have created a release candidate (RC0) for Apache Hadoop Thirdparty 1.0.0. RC Release artifacts are available at : http://home.apache.org/~vinayakumarb/release/hadoop-thirdparty-1.0.0-RC0/ Maven artifacts are available in staging repo:

[DISCUSS] hadoop-thirdparty 1.0.0 release

Hi All, Since Hadoop-3.3.0 release is around the corner, its time to release hadoop-thirdparty's first ever release, without which hadoop-3.3.0 cannot proceed for release. Below are the tentative date for RC and release. Since there is no much activity in this repo (other than the opentracing

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-16596) [pb-upgrade] Use shaded protobuf classes from hadoop-thirdparty dependency

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vinayakumar B resolved HADOOP-16596. Fix Version/s: 3.3.0 Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Release Note: All protobuf classes

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-16824) [thirdparty] port HADOOP-16754 (Fix docker failed to build yetus/hadoop) to thirdparty Dockerfile

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vinayakumar B resolved HADOOP-16824. Fix Version/s: thirdparty-1.0.0 Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Resolution: Fixed

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16824) [thirdparty] port HADOOP-16754 (Fix docker failed to build yetus/hadoop) to thirdparty Dockerfile

Vinayakumar B created HADOOP-16824: -- Summary: [thirdparty] port HADOOP-16754 (Fix docker failed to build yetus/hadoop) to thirdparty Dockerfile Key: HADOOP-16824 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-16820) [thirdparty] ChangeLog and ReleaseNote are not packaged by createrelease script

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vinayakumar B resolved HADOOP-16820. Fix Version/s: thirdparty-1.0.0 Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Assignee

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-16821) [pb-upgrade] Use 'o.a.h.thirdparty.protobuf' shaded prefix instead of 'protobuf_3_7'

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vinayakumar B resolved HADOOP-16821. Fix Version/s: thirdparty-1.0.0 Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Assignee

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16821) [pb-upgrade] Use 'o.a.h.thirdparty.protobuf' shaded prefix instead of 'protobuf_3_7'

Vinayakumar B created HADOOP-16821: -- Summary: [pb-upgrade] Use 'o.a.h.thirdparty.protobuf' shaded prefix instead of 'protobuf_3_7' Key: HADOOP-16821 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16821

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16820) [thirdparty] ChangeLog and ReleaseNote are not packaged by createrelease script

Vinayakumar B created HADOOP-16820: -- Summary: [thirdparty] ChangeLog and ReleaseNote are not packaged by createrelease script Key: HADOOP-16820 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16820

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-16621) [pb-upgrade] Remove Protobuf classes from signatures of Public APIs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vinayakumar B resolved HADOOP-16621. Fix Version/s: 3.3.0 Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Release Note: Following APIs have

Re: [DISCUSS] About creation of Hadoop Thirdparty repository for shaded artifacts

unification we can think > > parallel thread as Vinay mentioned). > > > > > > > > On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 at 6:21 PM, Vinayakumar B > > wrote: > > > >> Hi Sree, > >> > >>> apache/hadoop-thirdparty, How would it fit into ASF ? As an Incubating >

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-16595) [pb-upgrade] Create hadoop-thirdparty artifact to have shaded protobuf

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vinayakumar B resolved HADOOP-16595. Fix Version/s: thirdparty-1.0.0 Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Resolution: Fixed

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-16797) Add dockerfile for ARM builds

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vinayakumar B resolved HADOOP-16797. Fix Version/s: 3.3.0 Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Resolution: Fixed Merged PR

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16797) Add dockerfile for ARM builds

Vinayakumar B created HADOOP-16797: -- Summary: Add dockerfile for ARM builds Key: HADOOP-16797 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16797 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Sub

[NOTICE] Removal of protobuf classes from Hadoop Token's public APIs' signature

Hi All, This mail is to notify about the Removal of following public APIs from Hadoop Common. ClassName: org.apache.hadoop.security.token.Token APIs: public Token(TokenProto tokenPB); public TokenProto toTokenProto(); Reason: These APIs are having Generated

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-16358) Add an ARM CI for Hadoop

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vinayakumar B resolved HADOOP-16358. Fix Version/s: 3.3.0 Resolution: Fixed A Jenkins Job has been created to run

Re: [DISCUSS] About creation of Hadoop Thirdparty repository for shaded artifacts

st course of action.I am looking at, no projects > > should ever had to shade any artifacts except as an absolute necessary > > alternative. > > > > > > Thank you./Sree > > > > > > > > On Saturday, January 4, 2020, 7:49:18 AM PST, Vinayakumar B < > > v

Re: [DISCUSS] About creation of Hadoop Thirdparty repository for shaded artifacts

? Looking at HBase > as an example, it looks like everything that are known to break a lot after > an update get shaded into the hbase-thirdparty artifact: guava, netty, ... > etc. > Is it the purpose to isolate these naughty dependencies? > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 12:38 PM Vinayakumar B

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16774) TestDiskChecker and TestReadWriteDiskValidator fails when run with -Pparallel-tests

Vinayakumar B created HADOOP-16774: -- Summary: TestDiskChecker and TestReadWriteDiskValidator fails when run with -Pparallel-tests Key: HADOOP-16774 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16774

Re: Some updates for Hadoop on ARM and next steps

Also note that.. Nothing gets deployed back to maven central repo from this job. So no interference with other jobs and nodes as well. -Vinay On Thu, 28 Nov 2019, 10:55 pm Vinayakumar B, wrote: > Hi all, > > As a starter.. > Created a simple mvn based job (not yetus and docker as

Re: Some updates for Hadoop on ARM and next steps

Hi all, As a starter.. Created a simple mvn based job (not yetus and docker as current qbt on trunk on x86) in https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-qbt-linux-ARM-trunk/7/console Right now using the manual tools installed and the previous workarounds mentioned related to various third-party

Re: [DISCUSS] About creation of Hadoop Thirdparty repository for shaded artifacts

> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f12c589baabbc79c7fb2843422d4590bea982cd102e2bd9d21e9884b@%3Cdev.hbase.apache.org%3E > > > Thanks. > > Vinayakumar B 于2019年9月28日周六 上午1:28写道： > > > Please find replies inline. > > > > -Vinay > > > > On Fri

Re: Daily Builds Getting Aborted Due To Timeout

Thanks Ayush, I think possible other ways are improving the test runtime. 1. try "parallel-tests" profile if applicable on all modules whichever is okay with tests running in parallel. This may reduce the total unit tests runtime drastically. ex: I can see hadoop-hdfs-rbf takes around ~22 min.

Re: [DISCUSS] About creation of Hadoop Thirdparty repository for shaded artifacts

llowed in HBase. May be people involved in HBase can add some points here. Thoughts? > > .. Owen > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 8:38 AM Vinayakumar B > wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >>I wanted to discuss about the separate repo for thirdparty dependencies >> which

[DISCUSS] About creation of Hadoop Thirdparty repository for shaded artifacts

ed with the proposal. -Thanks, Vinay On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 11:54 AM Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli wrote: > Moving the thread to the dev lists. > > Thanks > +Vinod > > > On Sep 23, 2019, at 11:43 PM, Vinayakumar B > wrote: > > > > Thanks Marto

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16596) [pb-upgrade] Use shaded protobuf classes from hadoop-thirdparty dependency

Vinayakumar B created HADOOP-16596: -- Summary: [pb-upgrade] Use shaded protobuf classes from hadoop-thirdparty dependency Key: HADOOP-16596 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16596

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16595) [pb-upgrade] Create hadoop-thirdparty artifact to have shaded protobuf

Vinayakumar B created HADOOP-16595: -- Summary: [pb-upgrade] Create hadoop-thirdparty artifact to have shaded protobuf Key: HADOOP-16595 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16595 Project

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-16561) [MAPREDUCE] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate protobuf classes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vinayakumar B resolved HADOOP-16561. Fix Version/s: 3.3.0 Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Resolution: Fixed Merged

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-16560) [YARN] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate protobuf classes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vinayakumar B resolved HADOOP-16560. Fix Version/s: 3.3.0 Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Resolution: Fixed Merged already

Re: [NOTICE] Building trunk needs protoc 3.7.1

this only when there are changes related to shaded dependencies. -Vinay On Sun, 22 Sep 2019, 10:11 pm Steve Loughran, wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 3:22 PM Vinayakumar B > wrote: > >>Protobuf provides Wire compatibility between releases.. but not >

Re: [NOTICE] Building trunk needs protoc 3.7.1

> On Sep 21, 2019, at 9:55 AM, Vinayakumar B > wrote: > > > > @Wangda Tan , > > Sorry for the confusion. HADOOP-13363 is umbrella jira to track multiple > > stages of protobuf upgrade in subtasks. (jar upgrade, Docker update, > plugin > > upgrade, sha

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-16589) [pb-upgrade] Update docker image to make 3.7.1 protoc as default

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vinayakumar B resolved HADOOP-16589. Fix Version/s: 3.3.0 Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Resolution: Fixed Merged

Re: [NOTICE] Building trunk needs protoc 3.7.1

Hi Vinay, > > > > A bit confused, I saw the HADOOP-13363 is still pending. Do we need to > > upgrade protobuf version to 3.7.1 NOW or once HADOOP-13363 is completed? > > > > Thanks, > > Wangda > > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 8:11 AM Vinayakumar B >

[NOTICE] Building trunk needs protoc 3.7.1

Hi All, A very long pending task, protobuf upgrade is happening in HADOOP-13363. As part of that protobuf version is upgraded to 3.7.1. Please update your build environments to have 3.7.1 protobuf version. BUILIDING.txt has been updated with latest instructions. This pre-requisite to update

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16589) [pb-upgrade] Update docker image to make 3.7.1 protoc as default

Vinayakumar B created HADOOP-16589: -- Summary: [pb-upgrade] Update docker image to make 3.7.1 protoc as default Key: HADOOP-16589 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16589 Project

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16562) Update docker image to have 3.7.1 protoc executable

Vinayakumar B created HADOOP-16562: -- Summary: Update docker image to have 3.7.1 protoc executable Key: HADOOP-16562 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16562 Project: Hadoop Common

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16561) [MAPREDUCE] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate protobuf classes

Vinayakumar B created HADOOP-16561: -- Summary: [MAPREDUCE] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate protobuf classes Key: HADOOP-16561 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16561 Project

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16560) [YARN] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate protobuf classes

Vinayakumar B created HADOOP-16560: -- Summary: [YARN] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate protobuf classes Key: HADOOP-16560 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16560 Project: Hadoop

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16559) [HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate protobuf classes

Vinayakumar B created HADOOP-16559: -- Summary: [HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate protobuf classes Key: HADOOP-16559 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16559 Project: Hadoop

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16558) [COMMON] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate protobuf classes

Vinayakumar B created HADOOP-16558: -- Summary: [COMMON] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate protobuf classes Key: HADOOP-16558 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16558 Project

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16557) Upgrade protobuf.version to 3.7.1

Vinayakumar B created HADOOP-16557: -- Summary: Upgrade protobuf.version to 3.7.1 Key: HADOOP-16557 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16557 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type

Re: [DISCUSS] ARM/aarch64 support for Hadoop

t even without ARM, this is a > great idea. > > If you like we can get together during one of the HDFS meetups hosted by > Wei-chiu. > > Thanks > Anu > > > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 3:19 AM Vinayakumar B > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Thanks fo

Re: [DISCUSS] ARM/aarch64 support for Hadoop

t;> separate >> >> >>> branch with it's own ARM CI seems a really good idea. >> >> >>> By doing this we won't break any of the undergoing development in >> >> trunk >> >> >> and >> >> >>> a CI can be a very

Re: [VOTE] Moving Submarine to a separate Apache project proposal

+1 Thanks for the proposal. Its very interesting project and looks very promising one by looking at the participations from various companies and the speed of development. I would also like to participate in the project. Please add me as well. Thanks, -Vinay On Tue, 3 Sep 2019, 12:38 pm Rakesh

[DISCUSS] ARM/aarch64 support for Hadoop

Hi Folks, ARM is becoming famous lately in its processing capability and has got the potential to run Bigdata workloads. Many users have been moving to ARM machines due to its low cost. In the past there were attempts to compile Hadoop on ARM (Rasberry PI) for experimental purposes. Today ARM

[ANNOUNCE] New Apache Hadoop Committer - Ayush Saxena

Congratulations & Welcome aboard Ayush! Vinayakumar B (On behalf of the Hadoop PMC)

[ANNOUNCE] New Apache Hadoop Committer - Ayush Saxena

Congratulations & Welcome aboard Ayush! Vinayakumar B (On behalf of the Hadoop PMC)

Re: [VOTE]: Support for RBF data locality Solution

+1 for approach A. On Thu, 11 Apr 2019, 12:23 pm Akira Ajisaka, wrote: > The Approach A looks good to me. > > Thanks, > Akira > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 2:30 PM Xiaoqiao He wrote: > > > > Hi forks, > > > > The current implementation of RBF is not sensitive about data locality, > > since

Re: Including Original Author in git commits.

So.. if we started doing that already.. we can encourage contributors to attach formatted patch.. or create PRs. And update wiki to follow exact steps to contribute and commit. -Vinay On Thu, 14 Feb 2019, 4:54 pm Steve Loughran I've been trying to do that recently, though as it forces me to

Including Original Author in git commits.

Hi all, Right now we are committing with commitrer name as author and adding contributor name in commit message. This way of committing will not reflect in contributors git profile. I believe current way of crediting.. is based on SVN days.. Since now all apache repos are following git.. we can

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.1.2 - RC1

Sorry for being late. Thanks everyone for the Release efforts. +1 (Binding) -Built from tag on Ubuntu-18.04 -Successful Native build. -Deployed a 3-Node docker cluster with kerberos Security Enabled on Centos7 images. -Verified basic HDFS Commands -Ran basic wordcount Job. -Vinay On Wed, Feb

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to gitbox

+1 -Vinay On Mon, 10 Dec 2018, 1:22 pm Elek, Marton > Thanks Akira, > > +1 (non-binding) > > I think it's better to do it now at a planned date. > > If I understood well the only bigger task here is to update all the > jenkins jobs. (I am happy to help/contribute what I can do) > > > Marton > >

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-15901) IPC Client and Server should use Time.monotonicNow() for elapsed times.

Vinayakumar B created HADOOP-15901: -- Summary: IPC Client and Server should use Time.monotonicNow() for elapsed times. Key: HADOOP-15901 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15901

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-15856) Trunk build fails to compile native on Windows

Vinayakumar B created HADOOP-15856: -- Summary: Trunk build fails to compile native on Windows Key: HADOOP-15856 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15856 Project: Hadoop Common

Re: HADOOP-14163 proposal for new hadoop.apache.org

+1, New site looks great. Just one nit in README '--refresh' flag for hugo server no longer available. -Vinay On Mon, 3 Sep 2018, 10:21 am Shashikant Banerjee, wrote: > +1 > > Thanks > Shashi > > On 9/3/18, 9:23 AM, "Mukul Kumar Singh" wrote: > > +1, Thanks for working on this Marton. >

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-15602) Support SASL Rpc request handling in separate Handlers

Vinayakumar B created HADOOP-15602: -- Summary: Support SASL Rpc request handling in separate Handlers Key: HADOOP-15602 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15602 Project: Hadoop Common

Re: Can't pull the trunk code in windows- >File name too long

this is happening in Windows, Please somebody from yarn look into this. -Vinay On 13 Mar 2018 11:30 am, "Brahma Reddy Battula" < brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com> wrote: Hi Not able to pull/clone the trunk code. Does it possible make following shorten. fatal: cannot create directory at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.1 (RC0)

+1 Binding, 1. Checked out code from tag. 2. Built and deployed a 3-node docker cluster in secure mode (HDFS HA, Non-HA YARN). Docker script available in [1], if anyone need, 3. Ran wordcount job successfully. 4. Verified basic webhdfs commands using curl. 5. Verified basic HDFS commands [1]

[jira] [Reopened] (HADOOP-13738) DiskChecker should perform some disk IO

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vinayakumar B reopened HADOOP-13738: Re-opening to cherry-pick to branch-2.8 > DiskChecker should perform some disk

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-14910) Upgrade netty-all jar to 4.0.37.Final

Vinayakumar B created HADOOP-14910: -- Summary: Upgrade netty-all jar to 4.0.37.Final Key: HADOOP-14910 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14910 Project: Hadoop Common Issue

Hadoop 2.8.1 docs not available at http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/r2.8.1/

There are no webpages available in the below docs directory. All it lists is empty directories. http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/r2.8.1/ -Vinay

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-14427) Avoid reloading of Configuration in ViewFileSystem creation.

Vinayakumar B created HADOOP-14427: -- Summary: Avoid reloading of Configuration in ViewFileSystem creation. Key: HADOOP-14427 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14427 Project: Hadoop

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-14100) Upgrade Jsch jar to latest version

Vinayakumar B created HADOOP-14100: -- Summary: Upgrade Jsch jar to latest version Key: HADOOP-14100 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14100 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.3 RC0

+1 (binding) 1. Downloaded and Built from branch-2.7.3 2. Started up HDFS and YARN in Single Node cluster. 3. Ran WordCount job multiple times and Success. 4. Verified the "Release Notes" available at the URL mentioned by Vinod. Apart from that, Faced same issues as Andrew wang, while running

  1   2   >