Re: [DISCUSS] cull unused modules from under hadoop-tools

2022-04-07 Thread Sunil Govindan
hadoop-sls is used for perf tests. Thanks Sunil On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 11:57 AM Owen O'Malley wrote: > We really need input from the users as well. In trunk, hadoop-ozone and > hadoop-ant are already gone. > > Used: > hadoop-aliyun > hadoop-aws > hadoop-distcp > hadoop-azure-datalake >

Re: [DISCUSS] cull unused modules from under hadoop-tools

2022-04-07 Thread Owen O'Malley
We really need input from the users as well. In trunk, hadoop-ozone and hadoop-ant are already gone. Used: hadoop-aliyun hadoop-aws hadoop-distcp hadoop-azure-datalake hadoop-azure hadoop-dynamometer hadoop-federation-balance Questions: hadoop-archive-logs hadoop-archives hadoop-datajoin

Re: [DISCUSS] cull unused modules from under hadoop-tools

2022-04-07 Thread Ayush Saxena
Attic will not take this or will be very painfull for us, they in general take the entire project. Had a word with infra folks as well, we can probably move them under a seperate repo under hadoop and then archive it. Depandabot and such don’t scan archived repos. This should also solve our

Re: [DISCUSS] cull unused modules from under hadoop-tools

2022-04-07 Thread Steve Loughran
do that and we still have to worry about CVEs, dynabot complaints etc, build breaking changes. I am being more ruthless: can we move these into some attic repo. On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 at 09:39, Vinayakumar B wrote: > Can move unused ones to separate repo under hadoop, and introduce a > separate

Re: [DISCUSS] cull unused modules from under hadoop-tools

2022-04-07 Thread Steve Loughran
hey, we aren't to touch distcp. everyone uses that. good to know of the other two On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 at 09:01, Ayush Saxena wrote: > Distcp (I have a use case for it) > Hadoop-federation-balance(RBF uses it, we will take care in case it > bothers) > Hadoop-Dynamometer(This I feel is being used

Re: [DISCUSS] cull unused modules from under hadoop-tools

2022-04-01 Thread Vinayakumar B
Can move unused ones to separate repo under hadoop, and introduce a separate independent release cycle in case required. Any thoughts on this? -Vinay On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 at 1:31 PM, Ayush Saxena wrote: > Distcp (I have a use case for it) > Hadoop-federation-balance(RBF uses it, we will take

Re: [DISCUSS] cull unused modules from under hadoop-tools

2022-04-01 Thread Ayush Saxena
Distcp (I have a use case for it) Hadoop-federation-balance(RBF uses it, we will take care in case it bothers) Hadoop-Dynamometer(This I feel is being used from jira activies) So, these three we should let stay as is. Others the object store ones are active. You know which all are needed. For

[DISCUSS] cull unused modules from under hadoop-tools

2022-03-31 Thread Steve Loughran
how many of the modules under hadoop-tools get used/maintained? hadoop-aliyun hadoop-ant hadoop-archive-logs hadoop-archives hadoop-aws hadoop-azure hadoop-azure-datalake hadoop-datajoin hadoop-distcp hadoop-dynamometer hadoop-extras hadoop-federation-balance hadoop-fs2img hadoop-ftp