Ok, the last of the blockers is done.
I'll roll an RC tonight.
thanks,
Arun
On Jun 20, 2013, at 2:40 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
I think I've shared this before, but here you go again…
http://s.apache.org/hadoop-2.1.0-beta-blockers
At this point, HADOOP-9421 seems like
Have anybody from the HDFS side of things had a chance to look at the OOM
that Roman was reporting?
Thanks.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:26 AM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Ok, the last of the blockers is done.
I'll roll an RC tonight.
thanks,
Arun
On Jun 20, 2013, at 2:40
Arun,
It seems there are still a few things to iron out before getting 2.1 out of
the door.
As RM for the release, would you mind sharing the current state of things
and your estimate on when it could happen?
Thanks.
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
I think I've shared this before, but here you go again…
http://s.apache.org/hadoop-2.1.0-beta-blockers
At this point, HADOOP-9421 seems like the most important.
thanks,
Arun
On Jun 20, 2013, at 8:31 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur t...@cloudera.com wrote:
Arun,
It seems there are still a few
Ping. Any luck?
On Jun 17, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Roman,
Is there a chance you can run the tests with the full stack built against
branch-2.1-beta and help us know where we are?
Arun,
What do I do if I have I minor patch that I'd like to get out into 2.1, but
where I don't want to introduce instability into that 2.1 branch if you are
trying to make a beta release? For example,
HADOOP-9651https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9651 changes
the exception that
; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: Heads up: branch-2.1-beta
Ping. Any luck?
On Jun 17, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Roman,
Is there a chance you can run the tests with the full
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Ping. Any luck?
The full bigtop build failed because of Giraph:
http://bigtop01.cloudera.org:8080/view/Upstream-tests/job/Hadoop-2.1.0/label=centos5/4/console
Now, I'm pretty sure that's an issue with Giraph
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Ping. Any luck?
Unfortunately I've ran into:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9654
which was caused by the unrelated memory pressure on the NN,
but it had an unfortunate side effect of making the rest of
Hi Arun,
thanks for chiming in!
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
But there's a bit of bad news too (or at least the news that need to
be triaged). At
this point I don't know whether the Hadoop code is to blame or the
tests/components
themselves --
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Roman,
Is there a chance you can run the tests with the full stack built against
branch-2.1-beta and help us know where we are?
I will try to kick off the full build today. And deploy/test tomorrow.
It is all pretty
Which one are you talking about Ralph? This doesn't show up on any blocker list.
http://s.apache.org/hadoop-blocker-bugs
Arun
On Jun 15, 2013, at 4:44 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
Not trying to be a pain, but I am trying to get clarification. The protocol
buffer support is still broken. Do you
On Jun 15, 2013, at 8:19 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
Of the JIRAs in my laundry list for 2.1 the ones I would really want in are
YARN-752, MAPREDUCE-5171 YARN-787.
I agree YARN-787 needs to go in ASAP is a blocker - I'm looking at it right
now.
I'm ok with YARN-752 MAPREDUCE-5171
Karthik,
My apologies - I'll definitely spend time on this *today*.
Arun
On Jun 15, 2013, at 4:18 PM, Karthik Kambatla wrote:
Re-posting here to the wider audience:
HADOOP-9517 (Document Hadoop Compatibility): I believe I have incorporated
all suggestions so far. It would be great if
Thanks Arun, I'll take care of committing YARN-752 and MAPREDUCE-5171
around noon today (SUN noon PST).
What is your take on YARN-791 MAPREDUCE-5130?
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
On Jun 16, 2013, at 5:39 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
On Jun 15,
HDFS-4866 is marked as a blocker. A patch was submitted and applied, but it
only fixes compilation. As I marked on the ticket, the results remain unusable
due to linker issues.
On Jun 16, 2013, at 5:33 AM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Which one are you talking about Ralph? This
Alejandro,
Can you please take a look at MAPREDUCE-5327? This is related to YARN-787.
thanks,
Arun
On Jun 16, 2013, at 8:56 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
Thanks Arun, I'll take care of committing YARN-752 and MAPREDUCE-5171
around noon today (SUN noon PST).
What is your take on YARN-791
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur t...@cloudera.com wrote:
If the intention is to get the release out in time for the Hadoop Summit we
have a very tight schedule.
Because the release vote runs for 7 days, we should have an RC latest
Monday afternoon, and we should encourage
Arun, actually YARN-787 fixed the problem. Run those tests from trunk and
branch-2.1-beta HEADs without issues. Without YARN-787 they fail.
Thx
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Alejandro,
Can you please take a look at MAPREDUCE-5327? This is
Responses inline:
On Jun 16, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
But there's a bit of bad news too (or at least the news that need to
be triaged). At
this point I don't know whether the Hadoop code is to blame or the
tests/components
themselves -- all I know is that these tests passed
Roman,
Is there a chance you can run the tests with the full stack built against
branch-2.1-beta and help us know where we are?
thanks,
Arun
On Jun 16, 2013, at 4:50 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
Responses inline:
On Jun 16, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
But there's a bit of
Just curious of your procedures. Given that there is at least one blocker JIRA
out there that has yet to be fully resolved, do you intend to release anyway?
On Jun 15, 2013, at 8:19 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur t...@cloudera.com wrote:
If the intention is to get the release out in time for the
Re-posting here to the wider audience:
HADOOP-9517 (Document Hadoop Compatibility): I believe I have incorporated
all suggestions so far. It would be great if people could take another look
at it. I ll iterate fast on any comments so we get this in by the time rest
of the code pieces are
As Ramya noted, things are looking good on branch-2.1-beta ATM.
Henceforth, can I please ask committers to hold off non-blocker fixes for the
final set of tests?
thanks,
Arun
On Jun 4, 2013, at 8:32 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
Folks,
The vast majority of of the planned features and API work
Arun,
This sounds great. Following is the list of JIRAs I'd like to get in. Note
that the are ready or almost ready, my estimate is that they can be taken
care of in a couple of day.
Thanks.
* YARN-752: In AMRMClient, automatically add corresponding rack requests
for requested nodes
impact:
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 4:48 AM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
On Jun 5, 2013, at 11:04 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote
On the Bigtop side of things, once we have stable Bigtop 0.6.0 platform
based on Hadoop 2.0.x codeline we plan to start running the same battery
of integration tests
We are running into an issue where link to the AM leads to a 500
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-800
We should fix this before we release 2.1.0 beta.
--
Arpit Gupta
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
On Jun 10, 2013, at 4:49 AM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
On
On Jun 4, 2013, at 8:32 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
Folks,
The vast majority of of the planned features and API work is complete, thanks
to everyone who contributed!
I've created a branch-2.1-beta branch from which I anticipate I can make the
first of our beta releases very shortly.
We have started testing branch-2.1-beta and for most parts the code looks
very stable. We have deployed both secure and non-secure multinode clusters.
We had some minor hiccups with some of our e2e tests breaking due to
additional setsid info being logged by the bin scripts and errors while
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 4:48 AM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
On Jun 5, 2013, at 11:04 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote
On the Bigtop side of things, once we have stable Bigtop 0.6.0 platform
based on Hadoop 2.0.x codeline we plan to start running the same battery
of integration tests
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Ramya Sunil ra...@hortonworks.com wrote:
We had some minor hiccups with some of our e2e tests breaking due to
additional setsid info being logged by the bin scripts and errors while
building with snappy turned on.
Any chance some (all?) of these tests can be
On Jun 5, 2013, at 11:04 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote
On the Bigtop side of things, once we have stable Bigtop 0.6.0 platform
based on Hadoop 2.0.x codeline we plan to start running the same battery
of integration tests on the branch-2.1-beta.
We plan to simply file JIRAs if anything gets
32 matches
Mail list logo
