Re: [DISCUSS] Removing the archiac master branch

2020-06-22 Thread Sunil Govindan
+1 for initiating this! Sunil On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 10:50 PM Owen O'Malley wrote: > We unfortunately have a lot of master/slave and whitelist/blacklist > terminology usage in Hadoop. It will take a while to fix them all, but one > is easy to fix. In particular, we have a "master" branch that

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing the archiac master branch

2020-06-22 Thread Elek, Marton
On 6/19/20 7:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: We unfortunately have a lot of master/slave and whitelist/blacklist terminology usage in Hadoop. It will take a while to fix them all, but one is easy to fix. In particular, we have a "master" branch that hasn't been used since the project

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing the archiac master branch

2020-06-21 Thread Akira Ajisaka
-0 I prefer deleting source code from master instead of deleting the branch, as I did in branch-2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16988 I think we are in the following infinite loop: - Ask infra to delete master. - Some committer wrongly pushes master. - We ask infra again. In the

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing the archiac master branch

2020-06-21 Thread Rohith Sharma K S
+1 for deleting the "master" branch. - Rohith Sharma K S On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 at 22:50, Owen O'Malley wrote: > We unfortunately have a lot of master/slave and whitelist/blacklist > terminology usage in Hadoop. It will take a while to fix them all, but one > is easy to fix. In particular, we

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing the archiac master branch

2020-06-19 Thread Matt Foley
+1 Thanks Owen. —Matt — Open Source Technologies @  `This is not a contribution.` On Jun 19, 2020, at 10:19 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: We unfortunately have a lot of master/slave and whitelist/blacklist terminology usage in Hadoop. It will take a while to fix them all, but one is easy to

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing the archiac master branch

2020-06-19 Thread Sree Vaddi
+1 (I prefer a solution/patch at the software level rather user/project level.) in apache svn:Is SVN (https://subversion.apache.org/) planning to come up with a solution/patch at the software level so each project doesn't have to move from 'master' to 'main' branch ? in git:I read a news

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing the archiac master branch

2020-06-19 Thread Sangjin Lee
+1 On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 11:27 AM Eric Badger wrote: > +1 > > Eric > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 1:14 PM Ayush Saxena wrote: > > > Thanx Owen for initiating. > > +1 > > -Ayush > > > > > On 19-Jun-2020, at 10:52 PM, Zhe Zhang wrote: > > > > > > +1 Thanks Owen > > > > > > I scratched my head

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing the archiac master branch

2020-06-19 Thread Eric Badger
+1 Eric On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 1:14 PM Ayush Saxena wrote: > Thanx Owen for initiating. > +1 > -Ayush > > > On 19-Jun-2020, at 10:52 PM, Zhe Zhang wrote: > > > > +1 Thanks Owen > > > > I scratched my head for a while and couldn't think of a downside. > > > >> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 10:20

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing the archiac master branch

2020-06-19 Thread Ayush Saxena
Thanx Owen for initiating. +1 -Ayush > On 19-Jun-2020, at 10:52 PM, Zhe Zhang wrote: > > +1 Thanks Owen > > I scratched my head for a while and couldn't think of a downside. > >> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 10:20 AM Owen O'Malley >> wrote: >> >> We unfortunately have a lot of master/slave and

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing the archiac master branch

2020-06-19 Thread Zhe Zhang
+1 Thanks Owen I scratched my head for a while and couldn't think of a downside. On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 10:20 AM Owen O'Malley wrote: > We unfortunately have a lot of master/slave and whitelist/blacklist > terminology usage in Hadoop. It will take a while to fix them all, but one > is easy to