[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-9042) Add a test for umask in FileSystemContractBaseTest

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Colin Patrick McCabe updated HADOOP-9042: - Attachment: HADOOP-9042.008.patch here's a fix. Add a test

[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-9041) FileSystem initialization can go into infinite loop

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yanbo Liang updated HADOOP-9041: Release Note: The infinite loop caused by FileSystem.loadFileSystems(). If the users register

[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-9041) FileSystem initialization can go into infinite loop

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yanbo Liang updated HADOOP-9041: Release Note: (was: The infinite loop caused by FileSystem.loadFileSystems(). If the users

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9041) FileSystem initialization can go into infinite loop

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13497888#comment-13497888 ] Yanbo Liang commented on HADOOP-9041: - The infinite loop caused by

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9041) FileSystem initialization can go into infinite loop

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13497900#comment-13497900 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-9041: --- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9042) Add a test for umask in FileSystemContractBaseTest

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13497921#comment-13497921 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-9042: Integrated in Hadoop-Yarn-trunk #37 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9037) Bug in test-patch.sh and precommit build process

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13497927#comment-13497927 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-9037: Integrated in Hadoop-Yarn-trunk #37 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6607) Add different variants of non caching HTTP headers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13497929#comment-13497929 ] Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-6607: +1, looks good. It'll probably still

[jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-9044) add FindClass main class to provide classpath checking of installations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Loughran reassigned HADOOP-9044: -- Assignee: Steve Loughran add FindClass main class to provide classpath checking

[jira] [Work started] (HADOOP-9044) add FindClass main class to provide classpath checking of installations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Work on HADOOP-9044 started by Steve Loughran. add FindClass main class to provide classpath checking of installations

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9044) add FindClass main class to provide classpath checking of installations

Steve Loughran created HADOOP-9044: -- Summary: add FindClass main class to provide classpath checking of installations Key: HADOOP-9044 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9044 Project:

[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-9044) add FindClass main class to provide classpath checking of installations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Loughran updated HADOOP-9044: --- Attachment: HADOOP-9044.patch add FindClass main class to provide classpath checking

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9044) add FindClass main class to provide classpath checking of installations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13497963#comment-13497963 ] Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-9044: FindClass class with tests This is not

[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-9038) provide unit-test coverage of class org.apache.hadoop.fs.LocalDirAllocator.AllocatorPerContext.PathIterator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9038?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan A. Veselovsky updated HADOOP-9038: --- Attachment: HADOOP-9038.patch attached patch HADOOP-9038 adds a new unit test to

[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-9038) provide unit-test coverage of class org.apache.hadoop.fs.LocalDirAllocator.AllocatorPerContext.PathIterator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9038?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan A. Veselovsky updated HADOOP-9038: --- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) provide unit-test coverage of class

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9042) Add a test for umask in FileSystemContractBaseTest

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13497993#comment-13497993 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-9042: Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk #1227 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9037) Bug in test-patch.sh and precommit build process

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13497999#comment-13497999 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-9037: Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk #1227 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9042) Add a test for umask in FileSystemContractBaseTest

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498008#comment-13498008 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-9042: Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk #1258 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9037) Bug in test-patch.sh and precommit build process

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498014#comment-13498014 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-9037: Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk #1258 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9038) provide unit-test coverage of class org.apache.hadoop.fs.LocalDirAllocator.AllocatorPerContext.PathIterator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9038?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498017#comment-13498017 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-9038: --- {color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9045) In nodegroup-aware case, make sure nodes are avoided to place replica if some replica are already under the same nodegroup

Junping Du created HADOOP-9045: -- Summary: In nodegroup-aware case, make sure nodes are avoided to place replica if some replica are already under the same nodegroup Key: HADOOP-9045 URL:

[jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-9045) In nodegroup-aware case, make sure nodes are avoided to place replica if some replica are already under the same nodegroup

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Junping Du reassigned HADOOP-9045: -- Assignee: Junping Du In nodegroup-aware case, make sure nodes are avoided to place

[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-9045) In nodegroup-aware case, make sure nodes are avoided to place replica if some replica are already under the same nodegroup

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Junping Du updated HADOOP-9045: --- Attachment: HADOOP-9045.patch Upload patch with unit test in boundary case of placing 3rd and 1st

[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-9045) In nodegroup-aware case, make sure nodes are avoided to place replica if some replica are already under the same nodegroup

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Junping Du updated HADOOP-9045: --- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) In nodegroup-aware case, make sure nodes are avoided to

[jira] [Moved] (HADOOP-9046) provide unit-test coverage of class org.apache.hadoop.fs.DelegationTokenRenewer.RenewActionT

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan A. Veselovsky moved HDFS-4193 to HADOOP-9046: -- Key: HADOOP-9046 (was: HDFS-4193) Project: Hadoop

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9045) In nodegroup-aware case, make sure nodes are avoided to place replica if some replica are already under the same nodegroup

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498180#comment-13498180 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-9045: --- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the

[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-9036) TestSinkQueue.testConcurrentConsumers fails intermittently

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-9036: Attachment: HADOOP-9036.patch Ivan, how about a change like this?

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9042) Add a test for umask in FileSystemContractBaseTest

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498191#comment-13498191 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-9042: - I reverted the change, Colin, please post a

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9036) TestSinkQueue.testConcurrentConsumers fails intermittently

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498192#comment-13498192 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-9036: - Also we should make this change in

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6607) Add different variants of non caching HTTP headers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498193#comment-13498193 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6607: - +1 lgtm as well Add

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9036) TestSinkQueue.testConcurrentConsumers fails intermittently

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498197#comment-13498197 ] Ivan Mitic commented on HADOOP-9036: Thanks Suresh. We still have the race condition

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9036) TestSinkQueue.testConcurrentConsumers fails intermittently

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498201#comment-13498201 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-9036: --- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9042) Add a test for umask in FileSystemContractBaseTest

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498203#comment-13498203 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-9042: Integrated in Hadoop-trunk-Commit #3025 (See

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9047) TestHDFSFileSystemContract.testMkdirsWithUmask failed by using umask 022

Junping Du created HADOOP-9047: -- Summary: TestHDFSFileSystemContract.testMkdirsWithUmask failed by using umask 022 Key: HADOOP-9047 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9047 Project: Hadoop

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9048) TestHDFSFileSystemContract.testMkdirsWithUmask failed by using umask 022

Junping Du created HADOOP-9048: -- Summary: TestHDFSFileSystemContract.testMkdirsWithUmask failed by using umask 022 Key: HADOOP-9048 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9048 Project: Hadoop

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9019) KerberosAuthenticator.doSpnegoSequence(..) should create a HTTP principal with hostname everytime

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498206#comment-13498206 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-9019: -- Can't you just use the _HOST macro

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9048) TestHDFSFileSystemContract.testMkdirsWithUmask failed by using umask 022

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Junping Du resolved HADOOP-9048. Resolution: Duplicate It is duplicated with HADOOP-9047 as double click jira creation based on

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9047) TestHDFSFileSystemContract.testMkdirsWithUmask failed by using umask 022

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9047?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Colin Patrick McCabe resolved HADOOP-9047. -- Resolution: Fixed We're going to fix this in HADOOP-9042.

[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-9047) TestHDFSFileSystemContract.testMkdirsWithUmask failed by using umask 022

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9047?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Junping Du updated HADOOP-9047: --- Description: In PreCommit-test of HADOOP-9045, this error appears as it still use system's default

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9045) In nodegroup-aware case, make sure nodes are avoided to place replica if some replica are already under the same nodegroup

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498219#comment-13498219 ] Junping Du commented on HADOOP-9045: The unit test failed is unrelated but a umask

[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-9042) Add a test for umask in FileSystemContractBaseTest

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Colin Patrick McCabe updated HADOOP-9042: - Attachment: HADOOP-9042.009.patch here's an updated patch which includes the

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9045) In nodegroup-aware case, make sure nodes are avoided to place replica if some replica are already under the same nodegroup

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498225#comment-13498225 ] Junping Du commented on HADOOP-9045: Ok. HADOOP-9042 is going to fix it.

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9047) TestHDFSFileSystemContract.testMkdirsWithUmask failed by using umask 022

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9047?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498228#comment-13498228 ] Junping Du commented on HADOOP-9047: Great. Thanks Colin.

[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6607) Add different variants of non caching HTTP headers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-6607: --- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Status: Resolved (was:

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6607) Add different variants of non caching HTTP headers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498243#comment-13498243 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6607: Integrated in Hadoop-trunk-Commit #3027 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9019) KerberosAuthenticator.doSpnegoSequence(..) should create a HTTP principal with hostname everytime

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498245#comment-13498245 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-9019: He can use the _HOST macro, but that's

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9036) TestSinkQueue.testConcurrentConsumers fails intermittently

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498253#comment-13498253 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-9036: - bq. We still have the race condition

[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-8925) Remove the packaging

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8925?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-8925: Priority: Minor (was: Major) Remove the packaging

[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-8847) Change untar to use Java API instead of spawning tar process

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-8847: Affects Version/s: 1-win Change untar to use Java API instead of spawning tar

[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-8847) Change untar to use Java API instead of spawning tar process

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-8847: Attachment: HADOOP-8847.branch-1-win.4.patch Minor update to the patch to make else

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9045) In nodegroup-aware case, make sure nodes are avoided to place replica if some replica are already under the same nodegroup

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498273#comment-13498273 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-9045: ... The findbug problem

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8847) Change untar to use Java API instead of spawning tar process

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498276#comment-13498276 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8847: --- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9049) DelegationTokenRenewer needs to be Singleton and FileSystems should register/deregister to/from.

Karthik Kambatla created HADOOP-9049: Summary: DelegationTokenRenewer needs to be Singleton and FileSystems should register/deregister to/from. Key: HADOOP-9049 URL:

[jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-9049) DelegationTokenRenewer needs to be Singleton and FileSystems should register/deregister to/from.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9049?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Karthik Kambatla reassigned HADOOP-9049: Assignee: Karthik Kambatla DelegationTokenRenewer needs to be Singleton and

[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-9049) DelegationTokenRenewer needs to be Singleton and FileSystems should register/deregister to/from.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9049?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Karthik Kambatla updated HADOOP-9049: - Attachment: hadoop-9049.patch Attaching the latest patch from HDFS-4009.patch

[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-9049) DelegationTokenRenewer needs to be Singleton and FileSystems should register/deregister to/from.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9049?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Karthik Kambatla updated HADOOP-9049: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) DelegationTokenRenewer needs to be Singleton

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-8891) Remove DelegationTokenRenewer and its logic from FileSystems using it

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Karthik Kambatla resolved HADOOP-8891. -- Resolution: Invalid Per discussion on HDFS-4009, this is invalid anymore. The issue

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9050) CLONE - Remove java5 dependencies from build

Raja Aluri created HADOOP-9050: -- Summary: CLONE - Remove java5 dependencies from build Key: HADOOP-9050 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9050 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type:

[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-9050) CLONE - Remove java5 dependencies from build

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9050?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raja Aluri updated HADOOP-9050: --- Fix Version/s: (was: 0.21.1) CLONE - Remove java5 dependencies from build

[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-9050) CLONE - Remove java5 dependencies from build

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9050?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raja Aluri updated HADOOP-9050: --- Description: As the first short-term step let's remove JDK5 dependency from build(s) Created

[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-9050) CLONE - Remove java5 dependencies from build

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9050?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raja Aluri updated HADOOP-9050: --- Attachment: HADOOP-9050.branch-1-win.txt CLONE - Remove java5 dependencies from build

[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-9050) CLONE - Remove java5 dependencies from build

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9050?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raja Aluri updated HADOOP-9050: --- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) CLONE - Remove java5 dependencies from build

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9050) CLONE - Remove java5 dependencies from build

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9050?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498340#comment-13498340 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-9050: --- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9035) Generalize setup of LoginContext

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498342#comment-13498342 ] Robert Joseph Evans commented on HADOOP-9035: - The changes look good to me.

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9035) Generalize setup of LoginContext

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498350#comment-13498350 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-9035: Integrated in Hadoop-trunk-Commit #3029 (See

[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-9035) Generalize setup of LoginContext

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Joseph Evans updated HADOOP-9035: Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0.3-alpha 3.0.0

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9049) DelegationTokenRenewer needs to be Singleton and FileSystems should register/deregister to/from.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9049?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498382#comment-13498382 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-9049: --- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9047) TestHDFSFileSystemContract.testMkdirsWithUmask failed by using umask 022

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9047?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE resolved HADOOP-9047. Resolution: Not A Problem

[jira] [Reopened] (HADOOP-9047) TestHDFSFileSystemContract.testMkdirsWithUmask failed by using umask 022

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9047?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE reopened HADOOP-9047: Let's close this as not-a-problem since HADOOP-9042 was reverted.

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8977) multiple FsShell test failures on Windows

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498384#comment-13498384 ] Arpit Agarwal commented on HADOOP-8977: --- Daryn, I will address most of the issues

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9049) DelegationTokenRenewer needs to be Singleton and FileSystems should register/deregister to/from.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9049?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498446#comment-13498446 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-9049: - I need to look at this more, but you need to

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9050) CLONE - Remove java5 dependencies from build

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9050?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498505#comment-13498505 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-9050: - Raja, patch looks good. Couple of

[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-9049) DelegationTokenRenewer needs to be Singleton and FileSystems should register/deregister to/from.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9049?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Karthik Kambatla updated HADOOP-9049: - Attachment: hadoop-9049.patch Thanks Daryn. Definitely looking forward for your full

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9045) In nodegroup-aware case, make sure nodes are avoided to place replica if some replica are already under the same nodegroup

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498532#comment-13498532 ] Junping Du commented on HADOOP-9045: I am curious on this warning as line 464 is

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9049) DelegationTokenRenewer needs to be Singleton and FileSystems should register/deregister to/from.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9049?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498565#comment-13498565 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-9049: --- {color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the

[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-9042) Add a test for umask in FileSystemContractBaseTest

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-9042: Status: Patch Available (was: Reopened) Add a test for umask in FileSystemContractBaseTest

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9042) Add a test for umask in FileSystemContractBaseTest

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498570#comment-13498570 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-9042: --- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9036) TestSinkQueue.testConcurrentConsumers fails intermittently

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498598#comment-13498598 ] Ivan Mitic commented on HADOOP-9036: You're right, didn't look into the patch deeply

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8456) Support spaces in user names and group names in results returned via winutils

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498602#comment-13498602 ] Ivan Mitic commented on HADOOP-8456: bq. Only suggestion would be to use getopt to

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9051) “ant test” will build failed for trying to delete an non-existent file

meng gong created HADOOP-9051: - Summary: “ant test” will build failed for trying to delete an non-existent file Key: HADOOP-9051 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9051 Project: Hadoop

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9051) “ant test” will build failed for trying to delete an non-existent file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498625#comment-13498625 ] meng gong commented on HADOOP-9051: --- One kind of solution is following: --- a/build.xml

[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-9051) “ant test” will build failed for trying to delete an non-existent file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] meng gong updated HADOOP-9051: -- Attachment: fix-ant-test an solution to fix this bug “ant test” will build failed

[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-9051) “ant test” will build failed for trying to delete an non-existent file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] meng gong updated HADOOP-9051: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) “ant test” will build failed for trying to delete an