[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16700) RpcQueueTime may be negative when the response has to be sent later

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16977984#comment-16977984 ] xuzq commented on HADOOP-16700: --- Thanks [~xkrogen] for the comment, it's very helpful for me,  please

[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-16700) RpcQueueTime may be negative when the response has to be sent later

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] xuzq updated HADOOP-16700: -- Attachment: HADOOP-16700.002.patch > RpcQueueTime may be negative when the response has to be sent later >

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HADOOP-16700) RpcQueueTime may be negative when the response has to be sent later

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16971989#comment-16971989 ] xuzq edited comment on HADOOP-16700 at 11/12/19 2:20 AM: - Thanks [~xkrogen].

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HADOOP-16700) RpcQueueTime may be negative when the response has to be sent later

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16971989#comment-16971989 ] xuzq edited comment on HADOOP-16700 at 11/12/19 2:15 AM: - Thanks [~xkrogen].  

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16700) RpcQueueTime may be negative when the response has to be sent later

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16971989#comment-16971989 ] xuzq commented on HADOOP-16700: --- Thanks [~xkrogen].   newCall(_timestamp1_)  ->   enQueue ->    inQueue  

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16700) RpcQueueTime may be negative when the response has to be sent later

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16971407#comment-16971407 ] xuzq commented on HADOOP-16700: --- [~cgregori] [~xkrogen] please have a look, thanks. > RpcQueueTime may

[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-16700) RpcQueueTime may be negative when the response has to be sent later

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] xuzq updated HADOOP-16700: -- Attachment: HADOOP-16700-trunk-001.patch Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > RpcQueueTime may be

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16700) RpcQueueTime may be negative when the response has to be sent later

xuzq created HADOOP-16700: - Summary: RpcQueueTime may be negative when the response has to be sent later Key: HADOOP-16700 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16700 Project: Hadoop Common

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16336) finish variable is unused in ZStandardCompressor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16899731#comment-16899731 ] xuzq commented on HADOOP-16336: --- Thanks for the revert, [~jojochuang].  If there are multiple Frames in

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16336) finish variable is unused in ZStandardCompressor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16898792#comment-16898792 ] xuzq commented on HADOOP-16336: --- I'm so sorry to discuss this issue again. I think the  {{finish}}

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16385) Namenode crashes with "RedundancyMonitor thread received Runtime exception"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16869192#comment-16869192 ] xuzq commented on HADOOP-16385: --- The semantics of NetworkTopology#chooseRandom(final String scope, String