[GitHub] [hadoop] hfutatzhanghb commented on pull request #3976: HDFS-16452. msync RPC should send to acitve namenode directly

2022-06-02 Thread GitBox
hfutatzhanghb commented on PR #3976: URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/3976#issuecomment-1144886865 hi, @ayushtkn . could you please help me to review the code? thanks a lot. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to

[GitHub] [hadoop] hfutatzhanghb commented on pull request #3976: HDFS-16452. msync RPC should send to acitve namenode directly

2022-04-20 Thread GitBox
hfutatzhanghb commented on PR #3976: URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/3976#issuecomment-1104640306 @xkrogen Hi,Erik. Could you please help me to review the code. thanks a lot. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

[GitHub] [hadoop] hfutatzhanghb commented on pull request #3976: HDFS-16452. msync RPC should send to acitve namenode directly

2022-04-12 Thread GitBox
hfutatzhanghb commented on PR #3976: URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/3976#issuecomment-1097470379 > Sorry for the delay in my response @hfutatzhanghb. > > I want to make sure I understand your proposal fully. I think what you are saying is this: > > Currently when

[GitHub] [hadoop] hfutatzhanghb commented on pull request #3976: HDFS-16452. msync RPC should send to acitve namenode directly

2022-03-26 Thread GitBox
hfutatzhanghb commented on pull request #3976: URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/3976#issuecomment-1079719195 > hi, @xkrogen . So sorry for disturbing you. I have a new idea about what we have discussed. In practice, We usually plan some machines as Observer Namenode before setup

[GitHub] [hadoop] hfutatzhanghb commented on pull request #3976: HDFS-16452. msync RPC should send to acitve namenode directly

2022-03-21 Thread GitBox
hfutatzhanghb commented on pull request #3976: URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/3976#issuecomment-1073612305 hi, @xkrogen . So sorry for disturbing you. I have a new idea about what we have discussed. In practice, We usually plan some machines as Observer Namenode before setup

[GitHub] [hadoop] hfutatzhanghb commented on pull request #3976: HDFS-16452. msync RPC should send to acitve namenode directly

2022-02-24 Thread GitBox
hfutatzhanghb commented on pull request #3976: URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/3976#issuecomment-1050618080 hi, @xkrogen . thanks a lot. I agree with you. I will figure out the better solution as i can. we can discuss it later. very thanks -- This is an automated

[GitHub] [hadoop] hfutatzhanghb commented on pull request #3976: HDFS-16452. msync RPC should send to acitve namenode directly

2022-02-24 Thread GitBox
hfutatzhanghb commented on pull request #3976: URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/3976#issuecomment-1049649888 > @xkrogen , very very thanks for replying me so carefully. the code below is the constructor function of ObserverReadProxyProvider. yes, the failoverProxy is an