[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14033?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15859967#comment-15859967
 ] 

Kihwal Lee edited comment on HADOOP-14033 at 2/9/17 6:39 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------

Is it possible to add a meaningful metrics to show how reader threads 
(producer) are doing?


was (Author: kihwal):
Is it possible to add a meaningful metrics to show how readers are doing?

> Reduce fair call queue lock contention
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-14033
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14033
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: ipc
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.0
>            Reporter: Daryn Sharp
>            Assignee: Daryn Sharp
>         Attachments: HADOOP-14033.patch
>
>
> Under heavy load the call queue may run dry yet clients experience high 
> latency.
> The fcq requires producers and consumers to sync via a shared lock.  Polling 
> consumers hold the lock while scanning all sub-queues.  Consumers are 
> serialized despite the sub-queues being thread-safe blocking queues.  The 
> effect is to cause other producers/consumers to frequently park.
> The lock is unfair, so producers/consumers attempt to barge in on the lock.  
> The outnumbered producers tend to remain blocked for an extended time.  As 
> load increases and the queues fill, the barging consumers drain the queues 
> faster than the producers can fill it.
> Server metrics provide an illusion of healthy throughput, response time, and 
> call queue length due to starvation on the ingress.   Often as the load gets 
> worse, the server looks better.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to