[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17051442#comment-17051442
]
Wei-Chiu Chuang commented on HADOOP-16485:
--
Sorry [~tamaas] missed this out. With Hadoop 3.3.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17043561#comment-17043561
]
Tamas Penzes commented on HADOOP-16485:
---
It's worth reading the following article:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16950719#comment-16950719
]
Tatu Saloranta commented on HADOOP-16485:
-
Just to add quick comment regarding Jackson
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16916289#comment-16916289
]
Akira Ajisaka commented on HADOOP-16485:
bq. So what is the rule?
IMHO, security is more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16916288#comment-16916288
]
Akira Ajisaka commented on HADOOP-16485:
bq. We should get rid of org.codehaus.jackson too.
*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16913708#comment-16913708
]
Siyao Meng commented on HADOOP-16485:
-
[~Apache9] As long as it doesn't break client compatibility
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16912860#comment-16912860
]
Duo Zhang commented on HADOOP-16485:
OK, sometimes in the past we upgraded the jackson dependencies
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16911273#comment-16911273
]
Wei-Chiu Chuang commented on HADOOP-16485:
--
It just occured to me, that an even more critical
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16899654#comment-16899654
]
Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-16485:
-
It is tagged @Private/Evolving and mostly gets used
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16899545#comment-16899545
]
Duo Zhang commented on HADOOP-16485:
Oh I see why it is hard to decouple with jackson, we have a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16899456#comment-16899456
]
Duo Zhang commented on HADOOP-16485:
Gson is a bit different with jackson but if you understand the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16899226#comment-16899226
]
Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-16485:
-
+1 to cutting databind
I've had bad experiences
12 matches
Mail list logo
