[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9888) KerberosName static initialization gets default realm, which is unneeded in non-secure deployment.

2016-06-28 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15353099#comment-15353099 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-9888: SUCCESS: Integrated in Hadoop-trunk-Commit #10027 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9888) KerberosName static initialization gets default realm, which is unneeded in non-secure deployment.

2016-06-28 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15353055#comment-15353055 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-9888: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9888) KerberosName static initialization gets default realm, which is unneeded in non-secure deployment.

2016-01-06 Thread Kai Zheng (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15085280#comment-15085280 ] Kai Zheng commented on HADOOP-9888: --- The patch looks good to me. I would suggest we move the following

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9888) KerberosName static initialization gets default realm, which is unneeded in non-secure deployment.

2016-01-06 Thread Dmytro Kabakchei (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15085390#comment-15085390 ] Dmytro Kabakchei commented on HADOOP-9888: -- Got your point. Completely agree with you. I'll move

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9888) KerberosName static initialization gets default realm, which is unneeded in non-secure deployment.

2016-01-06 Thread Dmytro Kabakchei (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15085705#comment-15085705 ] Dmytro Kabakchei commented on HADOOP-9888: -- I've finished reviewing of what changes refactoring

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9888) KerberosName static initialization gets default realm, which is unneeded in non-secure deployment.

2016-01-05 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15083449#comment-15083449 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-9888: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9888) KerberosName static initialization gets default realm, which is unneeded in non-secure deployment.

2016-01-05 Thread Dmytro Kabakchei (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15083329#comment-15083329 ] Dmytro Kabakchei commented on HADOOP-9888: -- Somebody, please, review. > KerberosName static

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9888) KerberosName static initialization gets default realm, which is unneeded in non-secure deployment.

2016-01-04 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15080994#comment-15080994 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-9888: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9888) KerberosName static initialization gets default realm, which is unneeded in non-secure deployment.

2013-08-20 Thread Chris Nauroth (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13745177#comment-13745177 ] Chris Nauroth commented on HADOOP-9888: --- So far, we've only seen the DNS timeout