[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8251) SecurityUtil.fetchServiceTicket broken after HADOOP-6941

2012-04-05 Thread Devaraj Das (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13248052#comment-13248052 ] Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-8251: - Excellent catch, Todd! Could you please

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8251) SecurityUtil.fetchServiceTicket broken after HADOOP-6941

2012-04-05 Thread Devaraj Das (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13248086#comment-13248086 ] Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-8251: - bq. Sorry, I already committed this, and I

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7211) Security uses proprietary Sun APIs

2012-04-05 Thread Devaraj Das (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13248095#comment-13248095 ] Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-7211: - On HADOOP-6941, my aim was to make the hadoop

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8192) Fix unit test failures with IBM's JDK

2012-03-23 Thread Devaraj Das (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13237260#comment-13237260 ] Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-8192: - One option is to make the relevant hashmaps

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8192) Fix unit test failures with IBM's JDK

2012-03-23 Thread Devaraj Das (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13237262#comment-13237262 ] Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-8192: - Basically somehow make the order of

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8188) Fix the build process to do with jsvc, with IBM's JDK as the underlying jdk

2012-03-20 Thread Devaraj Das (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13233298#comment-13233298 ] Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-8188: - @Aaron, I don't think so. The trunk version

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6941) Support non-SUN JREs in UserGroupInformation

2012-03-20 Thread Devaraj Das (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13233563#comment-13233563 ] Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-6941: - Luke, yes, some unit tests fail with IBM's

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6941) Support non-SUN JREs in UserGroupInformation

2012-03-20 Thread Devaraj Das (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13233577#comment-13233577 ] Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-6941: - I committed the patch. Thanks, Stephen, Eli

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6941) Support non-SUN JREs in UserGroupInformation

2012-03-20 Thread Devaraj Das (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13233584#comment-13233584 ] Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-6941: - HADOOP-8192 is the jira to track the unit

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6924) Build fails with non-Sun JREs due to different pathing to the operating system architecture shared libraries

2012-03-19 Thread Devaraj Das (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13232919#comment-13232919 ] Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-6924: - @Eli, the problem is that 'default' doesn't

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6924) Build fails with non-Sun JREs due to different pathing to the operating system architecture shared libraries

2012-03-19 Thread Devaraj Das (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13233013#comment-13233013 ] Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-6924: - @Eli, the first path will be considered. If

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6924) Build fails with non-Sun JREs due to different pathing to the operating system architecture shared libraries

2012-03-19 Thread Devaraj Das (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13233033#comment-13233033 ] Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-6924: - Opened HADOOP-8187 for tracking future work.

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6924) Build fails with non-Sun JREs due to different pathing to the operating system architecture shared libraries

2012-03-17 Thread Devaraj Das (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13232092#comment-13232092 ] Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-6924: - I don't want to hold the commit of this really

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8088) User-group mapping cache incorrectly does negative caching on transient failures

2012-03-16 Thread Devaraj Das (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231371#comment-13231371 ] Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-8088: - The config for negative cache seems like an

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8088) User-group mapping cache incorrectly does negative caching on transient failures

2012-03-16 Thread Devaraj Das (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231463#comment-13231463 ] Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-8088: - Thinking about it, it may make sense to not

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6924) Build fails with non-Sun JREs due to different pathing to the operating system architecture shared libraries

2012-03-16 Thread Devaraj Das (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231790#comment-13231790 ] Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-6924: - @Eli, in my opinion, the first libjvm.so

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8132) 64bit secure datanodes do not start as the jsvc path is wrong

2012-03-16 Thread Devaraj Das (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231831#comment-13231831 ] Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-8132: - +1 (will commit it shortly)

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6941) Support non-SUN JREs in UserGroupInformation

2012-03-15 Thread Devaraj Das (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13229934#comment-13229934 ] Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-6941: - You are welcome, Luke! The version of Java

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6941) Support non-SUN JREs in UserGroupInformation

2012-03-15 Thread Devaraj Das (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13230416#comment-13230416 ] Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-6941: - bq. Just marking a patch open/PA again isn't

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6941) Support non-SUN JREs in UserGroupInformation

2012-03-15 Thread Devaraj Das (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13230700#comment-13230700 ] Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-6941: - @Luke the unit test/test-patch all pass with

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6941) Support non-SUN JREs in UserGroupInformation

2012-03-15 Thread Devaraj Das (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13230791#comment-13230791 ] Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-6941: - @Eli, sounds good. I noticed that Luke had

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6941) Support non-SUN JREs in UserGroupInformation

2012-03-15 Thread Devaraj Das (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13230824#comment-13230824 ] Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-6941: - Committed the patch on trunk/0.23 branches.

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8084) Protobuf RPC engine can be optimized to not do copying for the RPC request/response

2012-02-17 Thread Devaraj Das (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13210426#comment-13210426 ] Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-8084: - No I haven't done benchmarks. But it seemed to

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7557) Make IPC header be extensible

2012-02-09 Thread Devaraj Das (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13204742#comment-13204742 ] Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-7557: - bq. Why not just get rid of Writable and

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7987) Support setting the run-as user in unsecure mode

2012-01-24 Thread Devaraj Das (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13192344#comment-13192344 ] Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-7987: - +1 Support setting the

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7973) DistributedFileSystem close has severe consequences

2012-01-19 Thread Devaraj Das (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13189388#comment-13189388 ] Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-7973: - bq. #3 is a more comprehensive solution since