[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13248052#comment-13248052
]
Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-8251:
-
Excellent catch, Todd!
Could you please
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13248086#comment-13248086
]
Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-8251:
-
bq. Sorry, I already committed this, and I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13248095#comment-13248095
]
Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-7211:
-
On HADOOP-6941, my aim was to make the hadoop
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13237260#comment-13237260
]
Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-8192:
-
One option is to make the relevant hashmaps
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13237262#comment-13237262
]
Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-8192:
-
Basically somehow make the order of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13233298#comment-13233298
]
Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-8188:
-
@Aaron, I don't think so. The trunk version
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13233563#comment-13233563
]
Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-6941:
-
Luke, yes, some unit tests fail with IBM's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13233577#comment-13233577
]
Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-6941:
-
I committed the patch. Thanks, Stephen, Eli
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13233584#comment-13233584
]
Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-6941:
-
HADOOP-8192 is the jira to track the unit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13232919#comment-13232919
]
Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-6924:
-
@Eli, the problem is that 'default' doesn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13233013#comment-13233013
]
Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-6924:
-
@Eli, the first path will be considered. If
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13233033#comment-13233033
]
Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-6924:
-
Opened HADOOP-8187 for tracking future work.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13232092#comment-13232092
]
Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-6924:
-
I don't want to hold the commit of this really
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231371#comment-13231371
]
Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-8088:
-
The config for negative cache seems like an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231463#comment-13231463
]
Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-8088:
-
Thinking about it, it may make sense to not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231790#comment-13231790
]
Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-6924:
-
@Eli, in my opinion, the first libjvm.so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231831#comment-13231831
]
Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-8132:
-
+1 (will commit it shortly)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13229934#comment-13229934
]
Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-6941:
-
You are welcome, Luke! The version of Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13230416#comment-13230416
]
Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-6941:
-
bq. Just marking a patch open/PA again isn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13230700#comment-13230700
]
Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-6941:
-
@Luke the unit test/test-patch all pass with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13230791#comment-13230791
]
Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-6941:
-
@Eli, sounds good. I noticed that Luke had
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13230824#comment-13230824
]
Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-6941:
-
Committed the patch on trunk/0.23 branches.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13210426#comment-13210426
]
Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-8084:
-
No I haven't done benchmarks. But it seemed to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13204742#comment-13204742
]
Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-7557:
-
bq. Why not just get rid of Writable and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13192344#comment-13192344
]
Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-7987:
-
+1
Support setting the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13189388#comment-13189388
]
Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-7973:
-
bq. #3 is a more comprehensive solution since
26 matches
Mail list logo