[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17622232#comment-17622232
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-17705:
-
[~ste...@apache.org] exactly it fixes it completely!! Not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17621413#comment-17621413
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-17705:
-
Also fixes it on Hadoop 2.x versions if the SDK is updated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17621385#comment-17621385
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-17705:
-
[~ste...@apache.org] apparently this was the real fix to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17618963#comment-17618963
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-17705:
-
[~ste...@apache.org] yes the node is an onprem centos-8
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17617276#comment-17617276
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-17705:
-
[~ste...@apache.org]is it possible to accept a backport I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Senia updated HADOOP-16350:
Attachment: (was: HADOOP-16350.patch)
> Ability to tell Hadoop not to request KMS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Senia updated HADOOP-16350:
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
> Ability to tell Hadoop not to request KMS Information
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Senia reassigned HADOOP-16350:
---
Assignee: (was: Greg Senia)
> Ability to tell Hadoop not to request KMS Information
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16864250#comment-16864250
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-16350:
-
[~ajayydv] unfortunately its not working that way. It goes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16863558#comment-16863558
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-16350:
-
And I found why I made the change in the 3.x code line is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16863543#comment-16863543
]
Greg Senia edited comment on HADOOP-16350 at 6/13/19 11:51 PM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16863543#comment-16863543
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-16350:
-
[~szetszwo] the recommended suggestion won't work. The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16863065#comment-16863065
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-16350:
-
Additional Information showing the working distcp:
*Working
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16863061#comment-16863061
]
Greg Senia edited comment on HADOOP-16350 at 6/13/19 1:15 PM:
--
[~szetszwo]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16863061#comment-16863061
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-16350:
-
[~szetszwo] and [~jojochuang] here is what I didn't send
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16861684#comment-16861684
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-16350:
-
[~jojochuang] right now we are protected against that as we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16861661#comment-16861661
]
Greg Senia edited comment on HADOOP-16350 at 6/12/19 1:46 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16861661#comment-16861661
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-16350:
-
[~szetszwo] the problem is we use KMSClientProvider locally
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Senia updated HADOOP-16350:
Fix Version/s: 3.3.0
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Ability to tell Hadoop
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Senia updated HADOOP-16350:
Attachment: HADOOP-16350.patch
> Ability to tell Hadoop not to request KMS Information from
Greg Senia created HADOOP-16350:
---
Summary: Ability to tell Hadoop not to request KMS Information
from Remote NN
Key: HADOOP-16350
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16350
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16851188#comment-16851188
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-14104:
-
Stack trace showing exception:
$ hadoop distcp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16851162#comment-16851162
]
Greg Senia edited comment on HADOOP-14104 at 5/29/19 6:34 PM:
--
[~daryn] or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16851162#comment-16851162
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-14104:
-
[~daryn] or [~shahrs87] out of curiosity we are in a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16459056#comment-16459056
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-15250:
-
[~ajayydv] Feel free to run with it!!!
> Split-DNS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16373778#comment-16373778
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-15250:
-
[~ste...@apache.org] so I have some good news after doing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16372935#comment-16372935
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-15250:
-
These parameters the two DNS ones would never work in a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16372818#comment-16372818
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-15250:
-
[~ste...@apache.org] I think by binding to what is resolved
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16372201#comment-16372201
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-15250:
-
To test this patch as a unit test you would need to have a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Senia updated HADOOP-15250:
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> MultiHomed Server Network Cluster Network IPC Client Bind
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Senia updated HADOOP-15250:
Attachment: HADOOP-15250.patch
> MultiHomed Server Network Cluster Network IPC Client Bind Addr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16372050#comment-16372050
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-15250:
-
Interface Information. The Interface
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Senia updated HADOOP-15250:
Summary: MultiHomed Server Network Cluster Network IPC Client Bind Addr
Wrong (was: MultiHomed
Greg Senia created HADOOP-15250:
---
Summary: MultiHomed Server Network Cluster Network
Key: HADOOP-15250
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15250
Project: Hadoop Common
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15840625#comment-15840625
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-13988:
-
Is this the error we are
Talking about:
Failed on local
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15838925#comment-15838925
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-13988:
-
[~xyao] and [~lmccay] thanks for all the help with this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15834756#comment-15834756
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-13988:
-
[~xyao] and [~lmccay] here is log output from 02.patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15834630#comment-15834630
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-13988:
-
[~xyao] the second test fix seems to be working. I will leave
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15831010#comment-15831010
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-13988:
-
[~lmccay] the logs from above are from the patch uploaded an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15830995#comment-15830995
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-13988:
-
yes its running in our cluster. Just put the newest patch out
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Senia updated HADOOP-13988:
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> KMSClientProvider does not work with WebHDFS and Apache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Senia updated HADOOP-13988:
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
> KMSClientProvider does not work with WebHDFS and Apache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Senia updated HADOOP-13988:
Attachment: HADOOP-13988.patch
> KMSClientProvider does not work with WebHDFS and Apache Knox
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15830882#comment-15830882
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-13988:
-
[~xyao] We are currently running the fix patched into our HDP
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15826110#comment-15826110
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-13988:
-
Also in regards to test case let me know as this class
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15823189#comment-15823189
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-13988:
-
[~lmccay] made the changes sorry for delay. I think the test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Senia updated HADOOP-13988:
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> KMSClientProvider does not work with WebHDFS and Apache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Senia updated HADOOP-13988:
Attachment: HADOOP-13988.patch
> KMSClientProvider does not work with WebHDFS and Apache Knox
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Senia updated HADOOP-13988:
Attachment: (was: HADOOP-13988.patch)
> KMSClientProvider does not work with WebHDFS and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Senia updated HADOOP-13988:
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
> KMSClientProvider does not work with WebHDFS and Apache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Senia updated HADOOP-13988:
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> KMSClientProvider does not work with WebHDFS and Apache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Senia updated HADOOP-13988:
Attachment: (was: HADOOP-13988.patch)
> KMSClientProvider does not work with WebHDFS and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Senia updated HADOOP-13988:
Attachment: HADOOP-13988.patch
> KMSClientProvider does not work with WebHDFS and Apache Knox
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Senia updated HADOOP-13988:
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
> KMSClientProvider does not work with WebHDFS and Apache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15822563#comment-15822563
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-13988:
-
[~lmccay] I will fix shortly!
> KMSClientProvider does not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15822301#comment-15822301
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-13988:
-
This patch requires these JIRAs to be included also
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Senia updated HADOOP-13988:
Attachment: HADOOP-13988.patch
Initial Patch that is running in our test environment right now
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Senia updated HADOOP-13988:
Affects Version/s: 2.8.0
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> KMSClientProvider
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15822170#comment-15822170
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-13988:
-
[~lmccay] and [~xyao] I have my original patch I will attach
Greg Senia created HADOOP-13988:
---
Summary: KMSClientProvider does not work with WebHDFS and Apache
Knox w/ProxyUser
Key: HADOOP-13988
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13988
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15143360#comment-15143360
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-9969:
[~acmurthy] can we have a quick discussion on this JIRA to find
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15139596#comment-15139596
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-9969:
[~daryn] I have reached out to IBM JDK Security team to try to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15137124#comment-15137124
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-9969:
This also affects IBM JDK8...
> TGT expiration doesn't trigger
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15137486#comment-15137486
]
Greg Senia commented on HADOOP-9969:
[~crystal_gaoyu] and [~xinwei] I noticed it's stated that there
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Senia updated HADOOP-9969:
---
Affects Version/s: 2.7.2
> TGT expiration doesn't trigger Kerberos relogin
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Senia updated HADOOP-9969:
---
Affects Version/s: 2.8.0
2.6.0
2.6.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Senia updated HADOOP-9969:
---
Affects Version/s: 2.5.0
2.5.1
2.5.2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Senia updated HADOOP-9969:
---
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.7.2)
(was: 2.5.1)
> TGT expiration doesn't
68 matches
Mail list logo
