[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13455532#comment-13455532
 ] 

Kingshuk Chatterjee commented on HADOOP-8803:
---------------------------------------------

Xianqing, one thing that we will need to evaluate is the business value for the 
proposed change. In my mind, Hadoop will slowly be used as an infrastructure 
piece of an overall enterprise wide data management platform, instead of being 
accessed directly. Hortonworks HDP and IBM BigInsights are steps toward that 
direction. I know that China Telecom is (or, was) investigating the possibility 
of creating a data mining platform around Hadoop. Long story short, just as 
rarely anyone uses/accesses a RDBMS directly, Hadoop will also see itself being 
wrapped up in middleware layers. And when deployed in a cloud settings, there 
will undoubtedly additional security layers at physical, application, and 
network levels supported and invested by the cloud provider to ensure data 
security.

Needless to say, all these layers will add their own latency to data access.

So my question will be: What business value can we expect to derive from this 
additional security feature in Hadoop? Granted it is open-source, and its our 
collective sweat invested, but we will need to weigh in on what should be 
delegated to the product user, and what should be built into the product. 

What do you think?
                
> Make Hadoop running more secure public cloud envrionment
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-8803
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8803
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: fs, ipc, security
>    Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0
>            Reporter: Xianqing Yu
>              Labels: hadoop
>   Original Estimate: 2m
>  Remaining Estimate: 2m
>
> I am a Ph.D student in North Carolina State University. I am modifying the 
> Hadoop's code (which including most parts of Hadoop, e.g. JobTracker, 
> TaskTracker, NameNode, DataNode) to achieve better security.
>  
> My major goal is that make Hadoop running more secure in the Cloud 
> environment, especially for public Cloud environment. In order to achieve 
> that, I redesign the currently security mechanism and achieve following 
> proprieties:
> 1. Bring byte-level access control to Hadoop HDFS. Based on 0.20.204, HDFS 
> access control is based on user or block granularity, e.g. HDFS Delegation 
> Token only check if the file can be accessed by certain user or not, Block 
> Token only proof which block or blocks can be accessed. I make Hadoop can do 
> byte-granularity access control, each access party, user or task process can 
> only access the bytes she or he least needed.
> 2. I assume that in the public Cloud environment, only Namenode, secondary 
> Namenode, JobTracker can be trusted. A large number of Datanode and 
> TaskTracker may be compromised due to some of them may be running under less 
> secure environment. So I re-design the secure mechanism to make the damage 
> the hacker can do to be minimized.
>  
> a. Re-design the Block Access Token to solve wildly shared-key problem of 
> HDFS. In original Block Access Token design, all HDFS (Namenode and Datanode) 
> share one master key to generate Block Access Token, if one DataNode is 
> compromised by hacker, the hacker can get the key and generate any  Block 
> Access Token he or she want.
>  
> b. Re-design the HDFS Delegation Token to do fine-grain access control for 
> TaskTracker and Map-Reduce Task process on HDFS. 
>  
> In the Hadoop 0.20.204, all TaskTrackers can use their kerberos credentials 
> to access any files for MapReduce on HDFS. So they have the same privilege as 
> JobTracker to do read or write tokens, copy job file, etc.. However, if one 
> of them is compromised, every critical thing in MapReduce directory (job 
> file, Delegation Token) is exposed to attacker. I solve the problem by making 
> JobTracker to decide which TaskTracker can access which file in MapReduce 
> Directory on HDFS.
>  
> For Task process, once it get HDFS Delegation Token, it can access everything 
> belong to this job or user on HDFS. By my design, it can only access the 
> bytes it needed from HDFS.
>  
> There are some other improvement in the security, such as TaskTracker can not 
> know some information like blockID from the Block Token (because it is 
> encrypted by my way), and HDFS can set up secure channel to send data as a 
> option.
>  
> By those features, Hadoop can run much securely under uncertain environment 
> such as Public Cloud. I already start to test my prototype. I want to know 
> that whether community is interesting about my work? Is that a value work to 
> contribute to production Hadoop?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to