[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16581) ValueQueue does not trigger an async refill when number of values falls below watermark

2019-09-23 Thread Masatake Iwasaki (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16936220#comment-16936220 ] Masatake Iwasaki commented on HADOOP-16581: --- Thanks, [~xkrogen]. > ValueQueue does not

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16581) ValueQueue does not trigger an async refill when number of values falls below watermark

2019-09-23 Thread Erik Krogen (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16935957#comment-16935957 ] Erik Krogen commented on HADOOP-16581: -- Thanks [~iwasakims]! I had prepared the same patch and

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16581) ValueQueue does not trigger an async refill when number of values falls below watermark

2019-09-21 Thread Masatake Iwasaki (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16935220#comment-16935220 ] Masatake Iwasaki commented on HADOOP-16581: --- I attached addendum patch to fix the build

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16581) ValueQueue does not trigger an async refill when number of values falls below watermark

2019-09-21 Thread Masatake Iwasaki (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16935214#comment-16935214 ] Masatake Iwasaki commented on HADOOP-16581: --- [~xkrogen] branch-2 build failed due to lambda

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16581) ValueQueue does not trigger an async refill when number of values falls below watermark

2019-09-20 Thread Yuval Degani (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16934615#comment-16934615 ] Yuval Degani commented on HADOOP-16581: --- Thanks for reviewing and merging, folks! > ValueQueue

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16581) ValueQueue does not trigger an async refill when number of values falls below watermark

2019-09-20 Thread Erik Krogen (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16934591#comment-16934591 ] Erik Krogen commented on HADOOP-16581: -- Also backported to branch-3.2, branch-3.1, and branch-2.

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16581) ValueQueue does not trigger an async refill when number of values falls below watermark

2019-09-20 Thread Hudson (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16934582#comment-16934582 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-16581: - FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build Hadoop-trunk-Commit #17343 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16581) ValueQueue does not trigger an async refill when number of values falls below watermark

2019-09-20 Thread Erik Krogen (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16934568#comment-16934568 ] Erik Krogen commented on HADOOP-16581: -- Just merged this to trunk based on +1 from Anu and myself.

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16581) ValueQueue does not trigger an async refill when number of values falls below watermark

2019-09-19 Thread Erik Krogen (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16933525#comment-16933525 ] Erik Krogen commented on HADOOP-16581: -- Got a clean Jenkins run. +1 from me, will give one more

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16581) ValueQueue does not trigger an async refill when number of values falls below watermark

2019-09-18 Thread Erik Krogen (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16932659#comment-16932659 ] Erik Krogen commented on HADOOP-16581: -- The change LGTM, ping [~xiaochen] who I see has some