[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9749) Remove synchronization for UGI.getCurrentUser

2017-03-07 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15899775#comment-15899775 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-9749: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9749) Remove synchronization for UGI.getCurrentUser

2017-02-15 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15868112#comment-15868112 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-9749: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9749) Remove synchronization for UGI.getCurrentUser

2017-02-13 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15864567#comment-15864567 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-9749: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9749) Remove synchronization for UGI.getCurrentUser

2016-05-12 Thread Sangjin Lee (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15282181#comment-15282181 ] Sangjin Lee commented on HADOOP-9749: - There has been no movement on this for a while. We'll need to

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9749) Remove synchronization for UGI.getCurrentUser

2014-04-10 Thread Jonathan Eagles (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13965829#comment-13965829 ] Jonathan Eagles commented on HADOOP-9749: - Re-targeting to 2.5.0 as 0.23.x line

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9749) Remove synchronization for UGI.getCurrentUser

2013-07-19 Thread Kihwal Lee (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13713803#comment-13713803 ] Kihwal Lee commented on HADOOP-9749: I think this will be less critical for namenode