[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Amir Sanjar updated HADOOP-9465:
--------------------------------

    Attachment: HADOOP-9465.patch
    
> TestJobImpl->testJobNoTasks fails ..
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-9465
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9465
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: conf
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.3-alpha
>         Environment: Linux + IBM JAVA 6
>            Reporter: Amir Sanjar
>         Attachments: HADOOP-9465.patch
>
>
> I am not sure if this is a testcase or a design issue. During execution of 
> TestJobImpl->testJobNoTasks() there is an assertion made based on the order 
> of key/value pairs stored in adjacency list. However adjacency list was 
> created by Configuration->getValByRegex() as a HashMap (order is not 
> guaranteed):
> Testcase:
>     JobSubmittedEventHandler jseHandler = new 
> JobSubmittedEventHandler("testId",
>         "testName", "testNodeName", "\"key2\"=\"value2\" \"key1\"=\"value1\" 
> ");
>    ....
>    ....
>     try {
>       Assert.assertTrue(jseHandler.getAssertValue()); <===
> Configuration->getValByRegex():
> public Map<String,String> getValByRegex(String regex) {
>     Pattern p = Pattern.compile(regex);
>     Map<String,String> result = new HashMap<String,String>(); <=======
>    
> as we all know, HashMap makes absolutely no guarantees about the iteration 
> order. It can (and will) even change completely when new elements are added.
> Changing HashMap to LinkedHashMap fixes the ordering inconsistency, however 
> with a small performance side effect. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to