DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30408.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Phil Steitz wrote:
Eric MacAdie wrote:
I am starting to look at R for validating the stats functions. I also
found a site with some data sets, but I have not looked at them yet.
Eric,
Any help with the validation would be *much* appreciated.
-Phil
I *finally* have some results. I ran a couple
://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/jakarta-commons-sandbox/commons-sql/index.html
That said, some snippets follow:
The following annotations were provided:
-DEBUG- Sole jar [commons-sql-20040804.jar] identifier set to project name
-INFO- Enable verbose output, due to 1 previous error(s).
-INFO- Failed
snippets follow:
The following annotations were provided:
-DEBUG- Sole jar [commons-jelly-tags-jsl-20040804.jar] identifier set to project name
-INFO- Enable verbose output, due to 1 previous error(s).
-INFO- Failed with reason build failed
-INFO- Enable debug output, due to build failure
:
The following annotations were provided:
-DEBUG- Sole jar [commons-resources-20040804.jar] identifier set to project name
-INFO- Enable verbose output, due to 1 previous error(s).
-INFO- Failed with reason build failed
-INFO- Enable debug output, due to build failure.
The following work
details are available at:
http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/jelly-tags/commons-jelly-tags-define/index.html
That said, some snippets follow:
The following annotations were provided:
-DEBUG- Sole jar [commons-jelly-tags-define-20040804.jar] identifier set to project
name
-INFO- Enable
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30408.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30408.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
-20040804.jar] identifier set to project
name
-INFO- Enable verbose output, due to 1 previous error(s).
-INFO- Failed with reason build failed
-INFO- Enable debug output, due to build failure.
The following work was performed:
http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/jelly-tags/commons-jelly-tags-define
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30473.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30473.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30474.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Too specific I think.
Hen
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Gary Gregory wrote:
Hello,
I need a subclass of IOException that is really a NestableException so I
am wondering if a NestableIOException (extends IOException) would be a
good addition to lang.e or if it is too specific. If not, that's fine,
I sent this to the users group several days ago and haven't gotten a
response so I thought I would send it here with some additional info I
found.
Is there any reason to not use UTF-8 instead of iso-8859-1?
The problem I am trying to solve is to send a file from an English based
client to a
Yep, too specific
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 7:49 PM
Subject: Re: [lang] NestableException subclass NestableIOException?
Too specific I think.
Hen
On
Sorry it took so long to respond. I have to agree with the others that it is
too specific.
Steven Caswell
Sun Certified Java Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and
degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling that thinks that nothing is
I think I agree but I should have asked for this to go into the [io]
project since IOException is in java.io. But that would introduce a
dependency in [io] on [lang] and some folks react with some serious
allergies to this type of proposal. Too bad though.
Would anyone on the [io] team care to
rdonkin 2004/08/04 15:16:54
Modified:betwixt Tag: RELEASE_0_6_BRANCH project.xml
betwixt/src/java/org/apache/commons/betwixt/expression Tag:
RELEASE_0_6_BRANCH IteratorExpression.java
burton 2004/08/04 15:17:02
Modified:feedparser/src/java/org/apache/commons/feedparser/locate
DiscoveryLocator.java FeedLocator.java
FeedReference.java LinkLocator.java
ProbeLocator.java
Log:
Fixed bad bug with
S'much the same team :)
Maybe if something in [io] needed it at some point it could be used, but
as it's such an easy thing to add when the time comes, I'm in favour of
just waiting until [io] itself needs it.
Hen
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Gary Gregory wrote:
I think I agree but I should have
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30483.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
We have all requests posted to a servlet which delegates the request to a
Stateless Session Bean. Does creatring and invoking a Httpclient postmethod in a
helper class invoked by the Stateless Session Bean violate any of the EJB
specifications. (EJB spec says sockets are not to be
The release notes
(http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/commons/httpclient/RELEASE-NOTES) say:
-
(4) Cookie management
* 'Ignore cookies' cookie policy
-
But I'm not finding this capability in the docs or source code. Am I
just missing something?
Doug
Hi Doug,
The ignore cookies policy was added in 3.0 alpha1. The release notes
you quote are from this release. My guess is that you are looking at
the 2.0 source code and documentation, which does not include this
feature. The 2.0.1 release notes are available at
Hi Karthi,
Unfortunately I don't have much experience with EJBs, but if the spec
says that you can't open sockets, then it will be pretty hard to use
HttpClient. Perhaps someone else on this list has some more experience
in this matter.
Any EJB + HttpClient users out there?
Mike
On Aug 4,
hmmm, EJB + remote DB via jdbc needs sockets?
You can use EJB with socket, as long as the operation is quick.
In some case http socket operation can hang due to long response delay.
-D
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
26 matches
Mail list logo
