DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33228.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I've been looking into adding some methods to Validate; I'd appreciate
any feedback that anyone can provide about the utility of adding any/all
of the following methods to the Validate class.
The methods may need different names (especially the second method,
since it is actually performing a
Sorry, I don't know where my head is at tonight. Here it is again, with the
correct method bodies.
I've been looking into adding some methods to Validate; I'd appreciate
any feedback that anyone can provide about the utility of adding any/all
of the following methods to the Validate class.
The
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33228.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33228.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
This suspiciously familiar.
Most likely causes:
1) There is already a mail server running on the test port (was 25,
but there was talk of changing it to 2500)
2) You do not have the dumbster.jar
Regards,
-Corey
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 10:05:40 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok,
Paul Libbrecht wrote:
You're underestimating the eclipse deployment.
Am I? I don't think so. I am not talking about general use of
subversion, I am talking about use of svn to manage jakarta-commons
projects. The only problematic use case I've found with subeclipse is
adding a project to a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33228.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33228.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/24/2005 05:25:09 PM:
snip/
While I agree with everything that you have said about indiscriminate
logging, I think you are missing Richard's point here. In some
environments, this sort of ad hoc change is not allowed or cannot be
executed quickly
Richard Sitze wrote:
news [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/21/2004 08:04:09 AM:
+1, I agree with you and Ceki. TRACE is debatable (I personally like
it), more than TRACE is silly.
Well... call them what you will, I want em'!! lol
And yes, I'm leaning towards EXPLICITLY naming methods to encourage
Hello All:
I just noticed it's been about a month since the last 2.1 ponderings.
Where do we stand now?
Curious,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 7:22 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang] 2.1...
I kind of think that maybe commons-logging should be deprecated in
favor of:
http://logging.apache.org/log4j/docs/ugli.html
See UGLI does same thing. But competitions is a good thing; my projects
will ship w/ Log4j instead and ugli. One less jar is good.
.V
Matt Sgarlata wrote:
Richard
Well now... that IS interesting.
flames on
How in the WORLD did this happen? I approached Ceki about aligning JCL
with Log4J... and was turned down, he simply wasn't interested and
wouldn't acknowledge the value of the abstraction [at that time].
This feels like 'not-invented-here' and some
Title: RE: [codec] Base64.isArrayByteBase64() issue (WAS: codec : Bas64.isArrayByteBase64() issue)
Hi Gary,
The issue was resolved recently in the CVS
version.
There is still a test that's worth keeping
around (attached as a patch) and some much more minor changes (also as a patch)
that
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31457.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Brian!
Sorry for the long delay. I was in an delivery period and therefore out
of time.
After the next week I should have more time again.
I am not sure we should implement a poor-man's transaction if we could
have more ([transaction] ) for free.
Hmmm, I would like to have a depper look on
On 2005-01-25 19:40:35, Richard Sitze wrote:
How in the WORLD did this happen?
UGLI did not happen overnight. The idea was discussed on this list
among others over 6 months ago.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10865459724r=1w=2
This feels like 'not-invented-here' and some backstabbing.
+1
On Sat, 2005-01-22 at 13:31 -0500, Tim O'Brien wrote:
Alright a sufficient amount of time has passed for public comments and
testing.
This is a vote thread for migrating commons to SVN. If this vote
passes, I'll contact Justin and schedule the least disruptive migration
time possible.
I'm confused Ceki. You've spent a lot of time discussing
commons-logging on this list, while at the same time supporting
development of UGLI. Which component is your favorite? How come you're
working on 2?
Matt
Ceki Gülcü wrote:
On 2005-01-25 19:40:35, Richard Sitze wrote:
How in the
see reply on commons-user list
-- Dirk
ksv wrote:
Hello ,
Interests everything, that is connected to managements of transactions at use
DBCP...
Who Can will share experience or links? The database is not essential.
The principle of work with transactions through DBCP is necessary...
On 2005-01-25 20:45:34, Matt Sgarlata wrote:
I'm confused Ceki. You've spent a lot of time discussing
commons-logging on this list, while at the same time supporting
development of UGLI. Which component is your favorite? How come you're
working on 2?
As far as I knew, swearing allegiance to
Matt Sgarlata wrote:
You've spent a lot of time discussing commons-logging on this list,
while at the same time supporting development of UGLI. Which component
is your favorite? How come you're working on 2?
Simmer down now. Lets act intelligent. Many people work on many things
and share code
I'm sorry, I didn't mean for my post to sound angry, and I'm sorry if
anyone took offense. I was just asking :)
Ceki, thanks for that link. You have many excellent points, and I may
migrate my projects away from commons-logging.
Matt
Vic wrote:
Matt Sgarlata wrote:
You've spent a lot of time
Someone on struts-user got tripped up by what I thought was a bean that
didn't conform to the spec, but then I learned that for an indexed property,
you can have four accessors, such as:
String[] getProp()
String getProp( int )
void setProp( String[] )
void setProp( int, String )
Richard:
You might find the attached GIF handy ;-)
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sitze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 11:41 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?
Well now... that
Checking my mail history
Still TODO:
5)
- WordUtils
Capitalize with separator methods need to define null handling for
delimiter
list, and better javadoc for two of the three methods
And thats it, besides finding a volunteer to do the release (before a svn
change?)
Stephen
- Original Message
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33228.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
More than 72 hours have passed for this vote, I think everyone has had
ample opportunity to weigh in.
We need to do this when Justin is free, and that happens to be Thursday
morning or afternoon. Most other conversions are simple one shot
conversions, but commons is really more of a series of
I'm doing some revisions on i18n and, to do this, I reverse the class
diagrams below:
i18n
http://www.drianoxaman.kit.net/sandbox/i18n.gif
http://www.drianoxaman.kit.net/sandbox/i18n.doc
xmlio (in):
http://www.drianoxaman.kit.net/sandbox/xml-in.gif
From a mailing list I'm on.
Thought the developers would like to know.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Scot Mcphee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:35:34 +1100
Subject: Re: [ST-J] java rss?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
yeah I considered that, but you know, I was just trying
Dion Gillard wrote:
From a mailing list I'm on.
yeah I considered that, but you know, I was just trying out the
Configuration system and the PropertyConfiguration appears to indulge
in duplicating all the keys every time you write() the config back to
the disk! The quality of some Commons
Is your server up? I wanted to have a look at your diagrams, but the
request timed out :(
Oliver
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 01:13:07 -0800, Anaximandro (Woody)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm doing some revisions on i18n and, to do this, I reverse the class
diagrams below:
i18n
33 matches
Mail list logo
