DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33554.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33384.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33384.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33548.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33554.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33553.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: ebourg
Date: Mon Feb 14 02:03:35 2005
New Revision: 153757
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=153757
Log:
Fixed getLongArray(), getFloatArray() and getDoubleArray() in DataConfiguration
(Bug 33524)
Changed getXXXArray() and getXXXList() to return an empty array/list for empty
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33520.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33524.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
I created multiple jsvc instances that did not die.
That happens with the adapted Tomcat5.sh supplied with the Tomcat 5.5
distribution.
That's a problem.
I would appreciate some help in understanding the logic of the pid
file.
This is my view of things; please correct me and help me if I
Author: ebourg
Date: Mon Feb 14 03:54:15 2005
New Revision: 153777
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=153777
Log:
Removed a temporary test that wasn't supposed to be commited :)
Modified:
Hi Oliver,
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 08:16 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
[update]
- now all member variables of DefaultRuleManager are private -
introduced copy ctor for copying members from subclasses
thanks - that looks good to me.
- DefaultRuleManager now returns an unmodifiable list
Simon Kitching wrote:
And you can get subversion commands to ignore certain files by setting
the global-ignores entry in ~/.subversion/config. I have the following:
[miscellany]
global-ignores = *.o *.lo *.la .*~ *~ .#* *.class .*.marks
I believe it's much safer in the long run to do this in the
Robert,
I am a bit surprised by your question. As the current release manager
for JCL, I suppose that you are aware that LogFactoryImpl only uses
the thread context class loader (TCCL) to search for classes. You were
aware of that, weren't you? In theory, this is supposed to let a copy
of
At 05:59 PM 2/13/2005, robert burrell donkin wrote:
Anyway, before camouflaging errors occurring during
Logger retrieval, I'd recommend that you fix the bug exposed by
Example 2 in my analysis [1]. In my opinion it cannot be fixed without
a major redesign and overhaul of JCL, but maybe I am
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33561.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33553.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
It means a fix will be made available as part of the next phase.
ras
***
Richard A. Sitze
IBM WebSphere WebServices Development
Ceki Gülcü [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/14/2005 06:20:14 AM:
At 05:59 PM 2/13/2005, robert burrell donkin wrote:
Anyway,
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 01:08:53 +1300, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- DefaultRuleManager now returns an unmodifiable list upon
getMatchingActions
I'm not so sure about this one.
This change means a new object is created each time getMatchingActions
is called, and that is once
All of the tests pass for me after you applied the latest patch.
Thanks!
David
--- Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David,
It is failing because of the changes I rolled back for Field - I
didn't
roll back the associated change to Arg. Sorry about that, I did think
Iwas
going
Please add launcher to component list
Thanks in advance
Dirk
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33554.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Done.
--
Martin Cooper
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:27:50 +0100, Dirk Verbeeck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please add launcher to component list
Thanks in advance
Dirk
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33561.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33554.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17957.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: dflorey
Date: Mon Feb 14 10:22:59 2005
New Revision: 153822
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=153822
Log:
Added download page generation
Modified:
jakarta/commons/sandbox/i18n/trunk/xdocs/navigation.xml
jakarta/commons/sandbox/i18n/trunk/xdocs/quickstart.xml
Author: dflorey
Date: Mon Feb 14 10:45:26 2005
New Revision: 153827
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=153827
Log:
Added download page generation
Modified:
jakarta/commons/sandbox/i18n/trunk/project.properties
Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/i18n/trunk/project.properties
URL:
Author: dflorey
Date: Mon Feb 14 10:49:08 2005
New Revision: 153828
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=153828
Log:
Added download page generation
Modified:
jakarta/commons/sandbox/i18n/trunk/project.xml
Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/i18n/trunk/project.xml
URL:
Author: dflorey
Date: Mon Feb 14 11:03:07 2005
New Revision: 153829
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=153829
Log:
Added download page generation
Modified:
jakarta/commons/sandbox/i18n/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/i18n/LocalizedBundle.java
Author: tcurdt
Date: Mon Feb 14 11:59:23 2005
New Revision: 153837
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=153837
Log:
use revision number in jar name
Added:
jakarta/commons/sandbox/javaflow/trunk/lib/commons-jci-r153831.jar (with
props)
Removed:
I'm reviewing the jelly project to see if it is appropriate for my uses.
The sample project I've created includes much fewer jars than what is posted
at http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jelly/dependencies.html. Specifically,
I'm only inlcuding the following:
commons-cli
commons-collections
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:21:06 -0500, Peter Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm reviewing the jelly project to see if it is appropriate for my uses.
The sample project I've created includes much fewer jars than what is posted
at http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jelly/dependencies.html.
As with most dependency... each jar is only for a given purpose... if
you don't use that purpose you don't need it!
I think maven is considering assigning roles to dependencies since long
but... how do you express that dependency X is only for functionality Y
in general?
From your list, I
Paul Libbrecht wrote:
As with most dependency... each jar is only for a given purpose... if
you don't use that purpose you don't need it!
I think maven is considering assigning roles to dependencies since
long but... how do you express that dependency X is only for
functionality Y in general?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29402.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Mark Diggory wrote:
Are there any interests in having a VFS that works with ISO 9660 files
used to burn data CDROMs/DVDs? I could really use a means to work with
building iso files in Java for a project I'm working on.
Go ahead!
I havent looked at the libaries now, maybe a problem could be if
Stéphane Rault wrote:
I've understood that i can't resolveFile like
zip:file://c:/temp/toto.zip!/myFile.txt if toto.zip doesn't exist.
Bad news: The ZipFileProvider does not support creating/updating
zip-files. :-(
The same question is available if the URL is
Author: tcurdt
Date: Mon Feb 14 13:55:28 2005
New Revision: 153860
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=153860
Log:
fix a race condition. start the monitor thread after the listener was added
Modified:
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 12:14, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
Robert,
I am a bit surprised by your question.
i needed to make sure that i hadn't misunderstood what you were trying
to say...
As the current release manager
for JCL, I suppose that you are aware that LogFactoryImpl only uses
the thread
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 17:24 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 01:08:53 +1300, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- DefaultRuleManager now returns an unmodifiable list upon
getMatchingActions
I'm not so sure about this one.
This change means a new object is
that all depends on what is meant by fix :)
and on what is meant by soon :)
anyone (brian or dennis, maybe?) want to volunteer to take a look into
improving classloading for the 1.0.x development stream?
i'd be willing to make reviewing contributions a priority (but don't
think that i'll be
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33574.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33574.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: ozeigermann
Date: Mon Feb 14 16:29:48 2005
New Revision: 153876
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=153876
Log:
Reverted the unmodifiable wrapper for actionList on Simon's request
Modified:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:27:29 +1300, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 17:24 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 01:08:53 +1300, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- DefaultRuleManager now returns an unmodifiable list upon
Author: skitching
Date: Mon Feb 14 19:01:36 2005
New Revision: 153881
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=153881
Log:
Handle new fallback and mandatory action features of RuleManagers.
Modified:
Author: skitching
Date: Mon Feb 14 19:08:36 2005
New Revision: 153882
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=153882
Log:
Implement fallback and mandatory (aka supplementary) actions.
Also some whitespace tidyups.
Modified:
Author: skitching
Date: Mon Feb 14 19:10:06 2005
New Revision: 153883
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=153883
Log:
Functionality merged into DefaultRuleManager class.
Removed:
Author: skitching
Date: Mon Feb 14 19:14:37 2005
New Revision: 153884
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=153884
Log:
SupplementaryRuleManager has been merged into DefaultRuleManager.
The matching functionality has been moved to MatchUtils.
Removed:
Author: scohen
Date: Mon Feb 14 19:42:11 2005
New Revision: 153885
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=153885
Log:
Deprecate FTPClient.listFiles(String, String) to avoid confusion over new
FTPClientConfig methods
Modified:
Author: skitching
Date: Mon Feb 14 19:43:01 2005
New Revision: 153886
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=153886
Log:
New class containing code formerly in (deleted) class SupplementaryRuleManager.
Original author: Oliver Zeigermann
Added:
Author: skitching
Date: Mon Feb 14 19:43:56 2005
New Revision: 153887
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=153887
Log:
Test case code originally in (deleted) SupplementaryRuleManagerTestCase.
Original code by Oliver Zeigermann
Added:
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 01:35 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
After I have thought about it, I am +1 to do it the way you proposed
initially: have it all in one class. That's not because I am
frustrated or am no longer interested, but I think that's a good
solution and causes the least
Author: skitching
Date: Mon Feb 14 19:51:25 2005
New Revision: 153890
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=153890
Log:
Tweaked the peek methods to allow negative offsets, so that -1 can be used to
refer to the root element of the stack etc.
Modified:
Author: skitching
Date: Mon Feb 14 19:56:01 2005
New Revision: 153891
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=153891
Log:
Class LinkObjectsAction now provides the functionality of the
digester1.x classes SetNextRule, SetTopRule, SetRootRule.
Added:
Author: skitching
Date: Mon Feb 14 19:56:57 2005
New Revision: 153892
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=153892
Log:
LinkObjectsAction now provides all the functionality of
digester1.x SetNextRule, SetTopRule and SetRootRule.
Added:
I just added a Bugzilla entry which includes a patch. What do I need to
do to persuade someone to look at the bug and apply the patch?
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33574
-Trav
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
58 matches
Mail list logo
