Re: Incubating the Sandbox

2005-07-11 Thread Torsten Curdt
Thoughts? Hm... Your proposal does make sense but I am not quite sure if incubator is the right way to deal with the sandbox. Reasons why: o Sandbox components are usually small. Whether they can exist as their own full project is questionable. Or do you want to incubate it as

Incubating the Sandbox

2005-07-11 Thread Henri Yandell
[Spawned from thoughts on the Commons Csv component proposal] How does the following sound: * Move the Sandbox over into the Incubator project. * SVN commit rights remain the way they are currently. * Jakarta Commons and Apache Incubator come up with a simpler checklist of exit conditions tha

Re: [csv] Creating a CSV component (2)

2005-07-11 Thread Henri Yandell
On 7/7/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 00:15 -0400, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > > > So my proposal is that we submit Netcetera's CSV library to the ASF > > Incubator, with Jakarta (more correctly Jakarta Commons) acting as the > > sponsoring project. (

svn commit: r210206 - /jakarta/commons/proper/vfs/trunk/RELEASE_NOTES.txt

2005-07-11 Thread imario
Author: imario Date: Mon Jul 11 13:25:25 2005 New Revision: 210206 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=210206&view=rev Log: smb: now uses NtlmPasswordAuthentication for credentials passing fix for special characters in username/password allow domains with DOMAIN\USERNAME syntax Modified: j

svn commit: r210204 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/vfs/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/vfs/provider: GenericFileName.java smb/SmbFileName.java smb/SmbFileNameParser.java smb/SmbFileObject.java

2005-07-11 Thread imario
Author: imario Date: Mon Jul 11 13:22:54 2005 New Revision: 210204 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=210204&view=rev Log: smb: now uses NtlmPasswordAuthentication for credentials passing fix for special characters in username/password allow domains with DOMAIN\USERNAME syntax Modified:

Re: [VOTE] Release Betwixt 0.7

2005-07-11 Thread Brian K. Wallace
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 robert burrell donkin wrote: | unfortunately, a new bug has been discovered in betwixt (the optional | add-adders attribute for the addDefaultsRule is buggy see | http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jakarta-commons-user/200507.mbox/[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [VOTE] Release Betwixt 0.7

2005-07-11 Thread Simon Kitching
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 19:32 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote: > unfortunately, a new bug has been discovered in betwixt (the optional > add-adders attribute for the addDefaultsRule is buggy see > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jakarta-commons-user/200507.mbox/[EMAIL > PROTECTED]). > i

Re: [VOTE] Release Betwixt 0.7

2005-07-11 Thread Simon Kitching
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 13:37 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote: > Betwixt 0.7RC2 (available from > http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-betwixt/) has no issues known > to me. since this candidate was released, the only changes made have > been to update the version to 0.7. i would therefore li

Re: [VOTE] Release Betwixt 0.7

2005-07-11 Thread robert burrell donkin
unfortunately, a new bug has been discovered in betwixt (the optional add-adders attribute for the addDefaultsRule is buggy see http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jakarta-commons-user/200507.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]). it's a small, safe fix but it would mean cutting a new release candidate an

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35692] New: - Request of additional features

2005-07-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

FileUpload Servlet class, 1.1-dev???

2005-07-11 Thread Kinney, William
I was wondering what the status was for subclass servlet, specifically ServletFileUploadWrapper, for Common FileUpload? Its in the 1.1-dev API javadoc at http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/fileupload/apidocs/index.html, however it's not in any beta or nightly repository... I also noticed it hasn't b

Re: [CLI] Negative numbers and quoting

2005-07-11 Thread sebb
On 7/11/05, Nigel Rantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sebb wrote: > > Sorry, that's not what I meant. > > > > The Avalon CLI code is a *different* implementation of CLI, but which > > happened to have the same problem. > > > > To use Avalon instead of another CLI would require quite a few > > appli

Re: [CLI] Negative numbers and quoting

2005-07-11 Thread Nigel Rantor
sebb wrote: Sorry, that's not what I meant. The Avalon CLI code is a *different* implementation of CLI, but which happened to have the same problem. To use Avalon instead of another CLI would require quite a few application code changes. [And vice-versa, moving from Avalon to another CLI woul

Re: [CLI] Negative numbers and quoting

2005-07-11 Thread sebb
Sorry, that's not what I meant. The Avalon CLI code is a *different* implementation of CLI, but which happened to have the same problem. To use Avalon instead of another CLI would require quite a few application code changes. [And vice-versa, moving from Avalon to another CLI would mean lots of

Re: [CLI] Negative numbers and quoting

2005-07-11 Thread Nigel Rantor
sebb wrote: This was also a problem with the original Avalon CLI code. It was fixed in the updated version submitted via Bugzilla: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34672 The problem was that "-" was being treated as special even when collecting text for the current option value

Re: [VOTE] Release Betwixt 0.7

2005-07-11 Thread Brian K. Wallace
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 robert burrell donkin wrote: | Betwixt 0.7RC2 (available from | http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-betwixt/) has no issues known | to me. since this candidate was released, the only changes made have | been to update the version to 0.7. i would

[VOTE] Release Betwixt 0.7

2005-07-11 Thread robert burrell donkin
Betwixt 0.7RC2 (available from http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-betwixt/) has no issues known to me. since this candidate was released, the only changes made have been to update the version to 0.7. i would therefore like to propose that Betwixt 0.7 be cut from RELEASE_BRANCH_0_7. here's m

svn commit: r210105 - /jakarta/commons/proper/betwixt/branches/RELEASE_0_7_BRANCH/build.xml

2005-07-11 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Mon Jul 11 05:14:20 2005 New Revision: 210105 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=210105&view=rev Log: Regenerated build.xml. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/betwixt/branches/RELEASE_0_7_BRANCH/build.xml Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/betwixt/branches/RELEASE_0_7_

svn commit: r210104 - /jakarta/commons/proper/betwixt/branches/RELEASE_0_7_BRANCH/project.xml

2005-07-11 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Mon Jul 11 05:14:00 2005 New Revision: 210104 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=210104&view=rev Log: Updated version in preparation for release. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/betwixt/branches/RELEASE_0_7_BRANCH/project.xml Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/betwix

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35684] New: - FeedParser NullpointerException in WebSphere Portal 5.1

2005-07-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-vfs (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2005-07-11 Thread commons-vfs development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-vfs has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-vfs (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2005-07-11 Thread commons-vfs development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-vfs has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-configuration-10 (in module jakarta-commons-configuration-10) failed

2005-07-11 Thread dIon Gillard
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-configuration-10 has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-configuration-10 (in module jakarta-commons-configuration-10) failed

2005-07-11 Thread dIon Gillard
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-configuration-10 has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-07-11 Thread commons-jelly development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affect

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-07-11 Thread commons-jelly development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affect

Re: [CLI] two different versions of commons-cli-1.0.jar?

2005-07-11 Thread Torsten Curdt
Replacing the bad 1.0 on ibiblio with the correct one will make things even more confusing I think. People who have already downloaded the 1.0 will not get the update (including maven users where the bad jar is cached in ~/.maven/...). But then at least what we have advertised as cli 1.0 w

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-threading (in module jakarta-commons-sandbox) failed

2005-07-11 Thread Ted Husted
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-threading has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue af

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-threading (in module jakarta-commons-sandbox) failed

2005-07-11 Thread Ted Husted
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-threading has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue af

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-xmlio (in module jakarta-commons-sandbox) failed

2005-07-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-xmlio has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affect

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-xmlio (in module jakarta-commons-sandbox) failed

2005-07-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-xmlio has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affect