DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36795.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36795.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Niall Pemberton wrote:
I have also added comments to the dependencies page to indicate that the
maven-plugins are only required for building the validator site:
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/validator/dependencies.html
I like that more information is provided on the dependencies page,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36796.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36796.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36797.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36797.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36798.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36798.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
FileUtils.forceDelete(File) currently throws an IOException if the file
does not exist.
This seems like pretty crazy behaviour, so should we change it?
Theoretically, its a semantically incompatible change, but would it
really cause anyone issues? Is it more of a bug?
Stephen
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Author: tcurdt
Date: Sat Sep 24 04:53:44 2005
New Revision: 291284
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=291284view=rev
Log:
further refactoring and consolidation
Added:
jakarta/commons/sandbox/jci/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/jci/listeners/FileChangeListener.java
Author: tcurdt
Date: Sat Sep 24 05:25:31 2005
New Revision: 291289
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=291289view=rev
Log:
updated to latest jci, a few other changes
Added:
jakarta/commons/sandbox/javaflow/trunk/lib/commons-jci-r291284.jar (with
props)
Proposal
to me commons-exec is slightly over-engineered. As is, clients will
have to resort to strange things and rewrite somewhat complex helper
classes to do simple things.
I propose to change the API.
Vision: Make commons-exec a reusable Library that is available to all
SDK,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36799.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36799.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 9/24/05, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
I would suggest a better layout to be one table for real dependencies,
and another table for site dependencies.
But where did the comments come from? A maven tweak, or editing after
maven generation?
snap/
POM,
On 9/24/05, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FileUtils.forceDelete(File) currently throws an IOException if the file
does not exist.
This seems like pretty crazy behaviour, so should we change it?
Theoretically, its a semantically incompatible change, but would it
really cause
From: Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Niall Pemberton wrote:
I believe we are probably the only people in apache-land with versions of
these reports that work!
The report works as long as there have been no cvs2svn imports in the
last 30 days. That's not currently the case, but it will be
Its a feature available in version 1.9.2 of maven-changelog-report. You just
add comments as properties in the project.xml
dependency
..
..
properties
comment
Your comment here
/comment
/properties
/dependency
Niall
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36801.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: tcurdt
Date: Sat Sep 24 19:37:30 2005
New Revision: 291369
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=291369view=rev
Log:
fixed the testcases, fixed groovy error handling (does not produce any warnings
at all)
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36773.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
24 matches
Mail list logo