DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36795] New: - [exec] Environment: lack some HashMap methods delegation

2005-09-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36795. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36795] - [exec] Environment: lack some HashMap methods delegation

2005-09-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36795. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [Validator] Maven Changelog Report etc

2005-09-24 Thread Stephen Colebourne
Niall Pemberton wrote: I have also added comments to the dependencies page to indicate that the maven-plugins are only required for building the validator site: http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/validator/dependencies.html I like that more information is provided on the dependencies page,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36796] New: - [exec] EnvironmentVariable: inline private constructor

2005-09-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36796. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36796] - [exec] EnvironmentVariable: inline private constructor

2005-09-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36796. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36797] New: - [exec] EnvironmentVariable: remove empty factory method

2005-09-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36797. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36797] - [exec] EnvironmentVariable: remove empty factory method

2005-09-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36797. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36798] New: - [exec] several strange design / code decisions

2005-09-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36798. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36798] - [exec] several strange design / code decisions

2005-09-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36798. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[io] ForceDelete behaviour

2005-09-24 Thread Stephen Colebourne
FileUtils.forceDelete(File) currently throws an IOException if the file does not exist. This seems like pretty crazy behaviour, so should we change it? Theoretically, its a semantically incompatible change, but would it really cause anyone issues? Is it more of a bug? Stephen

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-09-24 Thread commons-jelly development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-09-24 Thread commons-jelly development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

svn commit: r291284 - in /jakarta/commons/sandbox/jci/trunk: ./ src/java/org/apache/commons/jci/ src/java/org/apache/commons/jci/compilers/groovy/ src/java/org/apache/commons/jci/listeners/ src/java/o

2005-09-24 Thread tcurdt
Author: tcurdt Date: Sat Sep 24 04:53:44 2005 New Revision: 291284 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=291284view=rev Log: further refactoring and consolidation Added: jakarta/commons/sandbox/jci/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/jci/listeners/FileChangeListener.java

svn commit: r291289 - in /jakarta/commons/sandbox/javaflow/trunk: ./ lib/ src/java/org/apache/commons/javaflow/ src/java/org/apache/commons/javaflow/bytecode/transformation/ src/java/org/apache/common

2005-09-24 Thread tcurdt
Author: tcurdt Date: Sat Sep 24 05:25:31 2005 New Revision: 291289 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=291289view=rev Log: updated to latest jci, a few other changes Added: jakarta/commons/sandbox/javaflow/trunk/lib/commons-jci-r291284.jar (with props)

Re: [exec] API, implementation various notes

2005-09-24 Thread jerome lacoste
Proposal to me commons-exec is slightly over-engineered. As is, clients will have to resort to strange things and rewrite somewhat complex helper classes to do simple things. I propose to change the API. Vision: Make commons-exec a reusable Library that is available to all SDK,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36799] New: - Docs inaccurately describe default value of testOnBorrow

2005-09-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36799. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36799] - Docs inaccurately describe default value of testOnBorrow

2005-09-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36799. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [Validator] Maven Changelog Report etc

2005-09-24 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 9/24/05, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip/ I would suggest a better layout to be one table for real dependencies, and another table for site dependencies. But where did the comments come from? A maven tweak, or editing after maven generation? snap/ POM,

Re: [io] ForceDelete behaviour

2005-09-24 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 9/24/05, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FileUtils.forceDelete(File) currently throws an IOException if the file does not exist. This seems like pretty crazy behaviour, so should we change it? Theoretically, its a semantically incompatible change, but would it really cause

Re: [Validator] Maven Changelog Report etc

2005-09-24 Thread Niall Pemberton
From: Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Niall Pemberton wrote: I believe we are probably the only people in apache-land with versions of these reports that work! The report works as long as there have been no cvs2svn imports in the last 30 days. That's not currently the case, but it will be

Re: [Validator] Maven Changelog Report etc

2005-09-24 Thread Niall Pemberton
Its a feature available in version 1.9.2 of maven-changelog-report. You just add comments as properties in the project.xml dependency .. .. properties comment Your comment here /comment /properties /dependency Niall

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36801] New: - FileUtils.cleanDirectory throws NullPointerException when File.list() fails

2005-09-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36801. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

svn commit: r291369 - in /jakarta/commons/sandbox/jci/trunk/src: java/org/apache/commons/jci/compilers/groovy/ test/org/apache/commons/jci/compilers/ test/org/apache/commons/jci/compilers/eclipse/ tes

2005-09-24 Thread tcurdt
Author: tcurdt Date: Sat Sep 24 19:37:30 2005 New Revision: 291369 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=291369view=rev Log: fixed the testcases, fixed groovy error handling (does not produce any warnings at all) Modified:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36773] - [digester] [PATCH] NodeCreateRule does not correctly handle namespaced attributes

2005-09-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36773. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.