I am +1 (in the sense of will help :-) for anything involving
improving docs. My one request would be that we start with the docs
that already exist and target the main commons web site to house this
stuff, rather than creating ever more scattered and incomplete Wiki
pages. The following items
On 12/1/05, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
To reask the question in this thread : what is broken with crlf ?
I use both windows and linux (and mix zips and tgz on both platforms) and
never had a single issue with this. It could be the way I work though :)
That is a good
Do i not understand Gump or the fact that we stick Jaxen head is
something that could be changed ?
Indeed, no-one really wishes to work with the latest jaxen currently.
thanks
paul
Dion Gillard wrote:
It's a break in how Jaxen works.
Unless we upgrade all of Jelly to work with the code
On 11/30/05, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
For me +1 means pretty much what Martin describes above. I check the
release contents, make sure required elements are there and in jars,
make sure there is nothing funny included. I test the builds,
validate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Herak Sen wrote:
Hi,
A very common method which I use for setting messages is by loading from an
external file and replace some tokens with desired values.
For e.g.
--
Hi!
Thanks for writing back
I agree that it won't be part of the core Email project,but as helpers or
utils.
Please comment.
Thanks
Herak
Brian K. Wallace [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Herak Sen wrote:
Hi,
A very common method which I use for
Maybe this is of interest:
* Programming guidelines: do's and don'ts
Chris
Phil Steitz wrote:
I am +1 (in the sense of will help :-) for anything involving
improving docs. My one request would be that we start with the docs
that already exist and target the main commons web site to house
Henri Yandell wrote:
Apache-Committer-Manual (imagine that exists too).
I would buy the mannings printed edition ;-)
---
Mario
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-224?page=all ]
Paul Libbrecht resolved JELLY-224:
--
Resolution: Invalid
This has nothing to do with Jelly...
All XML parsers have to load the DTD when it's referenced since a DTD can
indicate default
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The problem I would see with having this in email, even as a utility, is
that it isn't e-mail specific.
While your use case deals with the file system and (presumably?) a
bean-type substitution (e.g., @@LOGIN@@, user.getLogin()), there is a
broader
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-224?page=comments#action_12359135 ]
Simon Kitching commented on JELLY-224:
--
As Paul says, loading the DTD is required, for things like entity definitions
or default attribute definitions. See the xml specs
Phil Steitz wrote:
In the old days we kept lf line endings on all the source files in
cvs and hand-rolled ant scripts were used to put crlf on the .txt
files in the zips. Between maven and svn's eol=native, that is no
longer possible or at least immediate. The real question (see other
On 12/2/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One other comment that I have on the issue of voting on releases is
that the core problem here is lack of component-committed volunteers,
IMHO. I remember a couple of years back when we discussed whose votes
were binding on component releases.
Hi Oliver!
Sorry for not continuing the thread, i'm navigating currently on
apache's mail-archives...
1. i'll check the HEAD version for updates, thanx.
2. On Linux we use ReiserFS, on Solaris (i think) JFS, will check.
Either way, long (64byte+) file names are supported on Reiser. And
another
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-swing has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-224?page=comments#action_12359148 ]
Paul Libbrecht commented on JELLY-224:
--
You mean like a catalog based on public-identifiers, right ?
That could be considered, indeed, within the core tags... but we need
Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Steve Cohen wrote:
The thread Robert refers to has the subject
Re: Does Apache have agreement to use other open source code outside
of Apache?
Has this something to do with an email from IBM in the last few days
asking me if I am really was the creator of my
I got one of those emails as wellwhat is the class that the question is
over?
Jakarta Commons Developers List commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org wrote:
Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Steve Cohen wrote:
The thread Robert refers to has the subject
Re: Does Apache have agreement to use
I got one of those emails as wellwhat is the class that the question is
over?
Jakarta Commons Developers List commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org wrote:
Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Steve Cohen wrote:
The thread Robert refers to has the subject
Re: Does Apache have agreement to use
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-224?page=comments#action_12359149 ]
Thomas Dudziak commented on JELLY-224:
--
Perhaps xml-commons can help ?
http://xml.apache.org/commons/components/resolver/index.html
The parser always try to load the
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37755.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi!
Attach you will find the e-mail I got from IBM.
I am not on the PMC mailing list so I dont know every detail about the
current [net] issues, but I am a little bit angry about IBM as the told
me they would integrate commons-net into on of their project and I
answered them best of my
--- Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Attach you will find the e-mail I got from IBM.
I am not on the PMC mailing list so I dont know
every detail about the
current [net] issues, but I am a little bit angry
about IBM as the told
me they would integrate commons-net into
Hi Konstantin!
Legal departmen of IBM does his work. They try to
avoid any posible copyright issue after incorporating
commons-net into their product.
Ok, so please can one clarify why the question
Re: Does Apache have agreement to use other open source code outside of
Apache?
avoids a
Attach you will find the e-mail I got from IBM.
I am not on the PMC mailing list so I dont know every detail about
the current [net] issues, but I am a little bit angry about IBM as
the told me they would integrate commons-net into on of their
project and I answered them best of my
Torsten Curdt wrote:
Attach you will find the e-mail I got from IBM.
I am not on the PMC mailing list so I dont know every detail about
the current [net] issues, but I am a little bit angry about IBM as
the told me they would integrate commons-net into on of their
project and I answered
I suspect it may be a genuine request on IBM's behalf.
I am more concerned as to exactly what people feel may be a potential copyright
issue, whatever it is. Unfortunately without access to the pmc list, a good
deal of us are none the wiser.
Jakarta Commons Developers List
I suspect it may be a genuine request on IBM's behalf.
I am more concerned as to exactly what people feel may be a potential copyright
issue, whatever it is. Unfortunately without access to the pmc list, a good
deal of us are none the wiser.
Jakarta Commons Developers List
--- Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Konstantin!
Ok, so please can one clarify why the question
Re: Does Apache have agreement to use other open
source code outside of
Apache?
avoids a new commons-net release.
how would I know? :)
Which part of [net] violations our
I definitely intend to use the docs that are already there. In fact
I'm expecting that most of these are written, but I don't want to ask
that question until I have a ToC.
What I'm intending to do is to organize the scattered docs into a
centralized manual so that people don't have to search as
Herak,
Why wouldn't you use something like Velocity for this? Velocity is very
well equipped to handle these sorts of tasks and that's exactly what I use
for generating system emails. Commons email doesn't need any utility for
this. The body of an email is (for the most part) simply a string
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37667.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37667.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 12/2/05, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
I'd like to go ahead and remove all the committers from subversion for
commons, and then add back anyone who has committed in the last 6
months.
1 year - and if possible take the user/dev mailinglist for this
On 12/2/05, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/2/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will start. All I can really support right now are [math], [lang],
[collections] in commons proper and [id] in sandbox. One day when I
have more time and courage, I would like to jump
On 12/1/05, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/1/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to go ahead and remove all the committers from subversion for
commons, and then add back anyone who has committed in the last 6
months.
We have 105 commons committers, and 36
On 12/1/05, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/1/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some thoughts on the site.
A] Looking at the front page.
1) Jakarta link on the bar is redundant. We already have a huge logo
in the top left.
2) No need to include the direct svn
Might I add:
8) The bug database link should point to a page where an user is
advised to look in the sites of the single components instead of
pointing to http://jakarta.apache.org/site/bugs.html
Henri Yandell wrote:
Some thoughts on the site.
A] Looking at the front page.
1) Jakarta
Sorry Oliver I was on vacation this week.
Here is my +1
Emmanuel Bourg
Oliver Heger wrote:
There has been no reaction on this vote thread so far.
Will I have to cancel this release because of lack of interest? :-(
Oliver
Oliver Heger wrote:
Since the 1.1 release of Configuration we
Henri Yandell wrote:
7) Contributor page. Is this worth the effort of the maintenance?
I don't know how this page is maintained currently, but maybe it could
be built automatically from the POMs with a script ?
Emmanuel Bourg
1 dec 2005 kl. 23.35 skrev robert burrell donkin:
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 22:44 +0100, karl wettin wrote:
Is the sandbox project feed parser abandoned? I have updated the
source to work with the new jdom and would like to commit my
updates as I presume they are wanted. Sent an e-mail to Kevin a
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 21:02 -0500, Henri Yandell wrote:
For the thread's info; Robert's cc'd Rory on the pmc email.
This is legal shit and irritatingly it seems there are increased
liability issues when you talk publically.
+1
for some folks, copyright is a criminal matter (not just civil).
On 12/2/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/30/05, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
For me +1 means pretty much what Martin describes above. I check the
release contents, make sure required elements are there and in jars,
make sure there is
On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 08:08 +0100, Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Hi!
Any active committer should be on the PMC, unless they've only
recently joined, so if you're active kick away and one of us will
gladly nominate you.
I wasnt aware that we (the committers) are allowed to be on the PMC
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37761.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37761.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 12/2/05, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMO, what this tells us is the Commons isn't scaling, and that doesn't
surprise me at all. In the old days, there were a *lot* fewer components.
Right now, I count 35 components in Proper and 9 more active components in
the Sandbox (excluding
Two reasons.
1) Oversight. So it's much more obvious when a project is inactive and
low on committers.
2) Tidyness. I hate the thought of the long committer lists just
growing longer and more inaccurate.
I'm looking for a way to represent the active community of a
subproject, and while there
On 12/2/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this culture needs to change: there are still too few people nominating
new pmc'ers. IMHO it is an important part of the responsibility that
comes with nominating someone as a committer that you will guide them
through the first few
Henri Yandell wrote:
On 12/2/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this culture needs to change: there are still too few people nominating
new pmc'ers. IMHO it is an important part of the responsibility that
comes with nominating someone as a committer that you will guide them
On 12/2/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To get back to the original subject matter:
It looks as though Rory was pretty well able to resolve the questions
about the provenance of his code, although, I understand the lawyers may
still want to look a little closer. Do you have any idea
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki
for change notification.
The following page has been changed by HenriYandell:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/FrontPage
The comment on the change is:
Added CommonsManual link.
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki
for change notification.
The following page has been changed by HenriYandell:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/CommonsManual
The comment on the change is:
A proposal for a one-stop shop for
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki
for change notification.
The following page has been changed by HenriYandell:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/CommonsManual
The comment on the change is:
Fixing 2 links.
On 12/1/05, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/1/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to go ahead and remove all the committers from subversion for
commons, and then add back anyone who has committed in the last 6
months.
We have 105 commons committers, and 36
Author: martinc
Date: Fri Dec 2 22:01:02 2005
New Revision: 351899
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=351899view=rev
Log:
Make inner exception classes static, which they should have been all along.
Modified:
66 matches
Mail list logo
