This patch introduces two new functions to the DateValidator,
o boolean isLenient()
o void setLenient(boolean)
This patch also marks the existing (mispelled) functions, isLeniant and
setLeniant, as deprecated.
Index: cli/src/java/org/apache/commons/cli2/validation/DateValidator.java
This patch fixes a couple of small inconsistencies in the ResourceHelper
Javadoc. There are no functional changes.
Index: cli/src/java/org/apache/commons/cli2/resource/ResourceHelper.java
===
---
Hi all,
These two patches fix a couple of minor problems.
Patch 1 - Copy isLeniant and setLeniant methods in cli2.validator.DateValidator
to new (correctly spelled) isLenient and setLenient. Also add a bit of Javadoc.
Patch 2 - Fix a small warning in javadoc.
Please apply! :)
Thanks,
James
Hi James,
Thanks for providing them, but ...
James Ring wrote on Tuesday, December 20, 2005 9:00 AM:
Hi all,
These two patches fix a couple of minor problems.
Patch 1 - Copy isLeniant and setLeniant methods in
cli2.validator.DateValidator
to new (correctly spelled) isLenient and
... please, do us a favour and put them into Bugzilla, so they do not get lost.
Any effort by the maintainers is on a voluntary basis and you don't know, when
they have the time to look. A mailing list is not the proper archive for
proposed changes, bugfixes and patches.
Hi,
i agree with
Hi,
Is there a proposed release date for v1.0 for the scxml stuff?
And does the current build / will v1.0 implement the whole scxml
specification, or are there some bits missing.
Apologies if I'm asking questions that have been asked before - can't
find this info on the web tho.
Many Thanks!
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37969.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
The Jakarta Commons HttpClient project is pleased to announce the
release of HttpClient 3.0. This release fixes all of the bugs
discovered in RC4. As before, we strongly recommend that all users
upgrade to HttpClient 3.0. Please download and enjoy.
HttpClient 3.0 provides the following new
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37971.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37969.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37971.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
On Tuesday 20 December 2005 19:52, C. Grobmeier wrote:
... please, do us a favour and put them into Bugzilla, so they do not get
lost. Any effort by the maintainers is on a voluntary basis and you don't
know, when they have the time to look. A mailing list is not the proper
archive
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37973.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37973.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37974.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37974.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Thanks, Mike!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not sure about the release schedule because I've just started
working on this project, but for the question of completeness: the
current version if missing parts of the spec. We're working on an
update to align with the next release of the scxml specification, which
is scheduled for Q1 06.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37975.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: oglueck
Date: Tue Dec 20 06:15:16 2005
New Revision: 357992
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=357992view=rev
Log:
fixed broken link
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk/project.properties
Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk/project.properties
URL:
Author: oglueck
Date: Tue Dec 20 06:51:18 2005
New Revision: 358011
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=358011view=rev
Log:
fixed broken archive links
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk/project.xml
Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk/project.xml
URL:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37979.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: psteitz
Date: Tue Dec 20 08:13:22 2005
New Revision: 358027
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=358027view=rev
Log:
Updated to reflect 1.1 release.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/math/trunk/xdocs/navigation.xml
Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/math/trunk/xdocs/navigation.xml
That sounds great. How do I get a jira account so I can add a component?
-Original Message-
From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 2:10 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [jelly][vote] APT tag library
Ryan,
The idea of
Author: psteitz
Date: Tue Dec 20 09:08:16 2005
New Revision: 358039
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=358039view=rev
Log:
Updated to reflect 1.1 release.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/math/trunk/project.xml
jakarta/commons/proper/math/trunk/xdocs/changes.xml
+1..
Mvgr,
Martin
Martin Cooper wrote:
While the vote on Release Candidate 1 passed, I have taken the time to clean
up all of the minor issues reported against that candidate build, and to
modify the jar manifest to adhere to recently discussed Commons conventions.
This vote, therefore, is on
I am getting a troubling number of html diffs after generating the
main Jakarta site locally. Lots of single character changes and
various flavors of lines like this:
-hr size=1 noshade=noshade/
+hr noshade=noshade size=1/
I notice that the HTTPClient release is reflected in
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki
for change notification.
The following page has been changed by RahulAkolkar:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/SCXML/HomePage
The comment on the change is:
Its about time Commons SCXML had a plan
Gee... a website rebuild has broken Jelly's website where all
project-info and project-reports links are actually hidden... that needs
to be touched in not too long!
In any case, the jira page for Jelly is:
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jelly/
I think anyone can create an account.
paul
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki
for change notification.
The following page has been changed by RahulAkolkar:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/SCXML/1%2e0%2e0ReleasePlan
The comment on the change is:
A plan for the Commons SCXML
On 12/20/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is there a proposed release date for v1.0 for the scxml stuff?
snip/
Thanks for the nudge :-) An hour or so ago, I added a brief roadmap to
a Commons SCXML 1.0.0 release on the Apache wiki. That is here:
On 12/19/05, 中西 俊光 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Sir.
I noticed, commons-feedparser is hidden by
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/index.html.
but, http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/feedparser/ is available.
snip/
That just means no one cared to submit a feedparser description for
the
I lack the background for a couple of directories under commons proper
in SVN, but it will be nice to have that :-) These are not in the
externals for trunks-proper either.
* combo/
Was this concept ever put in motion? (committer list shows Craig and Hen)
* docs/
Much of the stuff under docs/
On 12/20/05, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I lack the background for a couple of directories under commons proper
in SVN, but it will be nice to have that :-) These are not in the
externals for trunks-proper either.
* combo/
The original theory here was that we could produce a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37971.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Ignore last post. Had my .antrc pointing at jdk 1.4. Seems to require 1.5.
Phil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Jakarta Commons Math team is pleased to announce the release of
Commons Math 1.1.
Commons Math is a library of lightweight, self-contained mathematics and
statistics components. For more information, see the Commons Math web site:
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/math/.
The new release
Henk suggested that we should be deleting old release jars from
/dist/java-repository, since this is mirrorred along with the rest of
/dist.
Does anyone have objections to removing old release jars from this
repo? IIUC the setup, ibiblio does not pick up deletes, so this
should not cause a
Ibiblio won't pick up deletes - that's correct.
What I want to do for the maven 2 repository is sync from
archive.apache.org instead of www.apache.org, and tie the deletion from
www.apache.org to the deletion of the actual release. The maven 2
repository sync *will* honour deletes.
But I have no
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37971.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37971.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37971.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
We need to make a decision on which way to go here...either demote
back to sandbox/dormant or have someone step up to drive this
component toward a release.
I am happy to help getting the site fixed (seems we just need to add
it to the nav, as http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/feedparser/ is
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37985.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37985.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
45 matches
Mail list logo
