DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38959.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-chain has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-chain has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-latka has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-latka has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community
Hi,
I would like to be able to run the validation on every item in a list and
I'm finding that as soon as one of the elements fails validation, the
validator stops and the remaining items in the list are not validated. I
took a look at the source code and this is what I found.
Theres an open bug for this
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22046
Niall
- Original Message -
From: Ed Cavalari [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 1:30 PM
Subject: commons-validator indexed properties
Hi,
I would
Author: sandymac
Date: Wed Mar 15 09:15:58 2006
New Revision: 386116
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386116view=rev
Log:
Fixed one of the constructors that was ignoring a maxTotal parameter.
Fixed some JavaDoc @links to the KeyedPoolableObjectFactory
Modified:
Author: imario
Date: Wed Mar 15 10:46:11 2006
New Revision: 386128
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386128view=rev
Log:
PR: 38935
ramfs: Removed dependency to commons-collections
Thanks to Edgar Poce for the patch.
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38935.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38846.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38847.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: imario
Date: Wed Mar 15 11:12:28 2006
New Revision: 386137
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386137view=rev
Log:
PR: 38491
Added a failonerror attribute.
Thanks to Steven Tyler for pointing it out.
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38491.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38122.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: imario
Date: Wed Mar 15 11:22:44 2006
New Revision: 386144
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386144view=rev
Log:
PR: 38122
return null on FileObject.getChildren() if there is a problem to determine if
there are children or not (like java.io.File)
In contrast to an empty collection
Author: imario
Date: Wed Mar 15 11:25:08 2006
New Revision: 386145
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386145view=rev
Log:
switched back to the main apache site
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/vfs/trunk/project.xml
Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/vfs/trunk/project.xml
URL:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33965.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38959.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: imario
Date: Wed Mar 15 11:36:15 2006
New Revision: 386150
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386150view=rev
Log:
PR: 36157
get rid of deprecation warning
Thanks to Jacob Kjome for pointing this out
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36157.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: imario
Date: Wed Mar 15 11:50:12 2006
New Revision: 386152
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386152view=rev
Log:
aggresively set the lastModificationTime
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/vfs/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/vfs/provider/ram/RamFileData.java
Author: imario
Date: Wed Mar 15 11:51:07 2006
New Revision: 386153
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386153view=rev
Log:
PR: 37991
return the lastModificationTime if fileObject used via URL
Thanks to Marc Palmer for reporting it.
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37991.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38935.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38987.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38929.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: olegk
Date: Wed Mar 15 12:32:28 2006
New Revision: 386156
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386156view=rev
Log:
Removed dependency on common-build
Added:
jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk/xdocs/style/
jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk/xdocs/style/project.css
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 23:51 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
the int map stuff has been stalled for the last week but i hope to be
able to get back on track sometime this week. i know that a new
primitives release is pencilled in without int map but i'd like to
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 00:12 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Progress to remove commons-build seems to be moving along nicley. So far
at least [lang], [io], [primitives], [collections], [codec], [logging]
and [betwixt] are done, plus [pool] unpublished.
Commons [HttpClient] converted as
Author: olegk
Date: Wed Mar 15 12:52:48 2006
New Revision: 386159
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386159view=rev
Log:
Removed link to the HttpClient 2.0 docs
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk/xdocs/navigation.xml
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38987.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Stephen,
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 11:16, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
[X] +1 I support this release
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 I do not support this release because...
Also non-binding. :(
Stephen
Regards,
James
--
James Ring
pgpyb1cGRQbBw.pgp
Description: PGP
Author: rdonkin
Date: Wed Mar 15 13:06:38 2006
New Revision: 386164
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386164view=rev
Log:
Upgraded manifest to reflect upcoming release candidate.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/conf/MANIFEST.MF
Modified:
Author: rdonkin
Date: Wed Mar 15 13:10:30 2006
New Revision: 386165
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386165view=rev
Log:
Tag for release candidate 6
Added:
jakarta/commons/proper/logging/tags/LOGGING_1_1_0_RC6/
- copied from r386164, jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/
On 3/14/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The third attempt at a vote for the release of [io] v1.2.
This vote is on RC5.
[X ] +1 I support this release
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 I do not support this release because...
--
Sandy McArthur
He who dares
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38987.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 23:37 -0800, Henri Yandell wrote:
Uhoh:
I tried to remove my test directory and got:
override r--r--r-- hen/hen for
io-test//commons-io-1.2-RC5-src/target/jdiff/IO_1_1/.svn/dir-prop-base?
ie) you've got some .svn directories in your src zip (worth checking
the
+1
Tested building with Ant 1.6.5 and Maven 1.0.2 on Sun Java 1.4.2_11 on
Windows XP SP2.
Gary
PS:
Checkstyle nits:
Error Line
Error Unused import - java.io.UnsupportedEncodingException. 26
Error Unused @throws tag for 'UnsupportedEncodingException'. 868
Error Unused @throws tag for
I see that the JDiff report is marked Between IO_1_1 and CURRENT. I
imagine that the Maven build will be re-run after a IO_1_2 is created?
Just checking... ;)
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 4:16 PM
To: Jakarta
This is not so great: 0% unit test coverage on:
http://people.apache.org/~scolebourne/commons-io/site/cobertura/org.apac
he.commons.io.input.ProxyReader.html
and
http://people.apache.org/~scolebourne/commons-io/site/cobertura/org.apac
he.commons.io.output.ProxyWriter.html
Gary
-Original
release candidate 6 for the Jakarta Commons Logging 1.1.0 release is now
available from: http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-logging/. the
Jakarta Commons team believes that this release delivers major advances
in stability over the 1.0.x series of releases whilst retaining
backwards
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38688.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/pool/impl/TestStackKeyedObjectPool.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta/commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/pool/impl/TestStackKeyedObjectPool.java?rev=386186r1=386185r2=386186view=diff
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38688.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38987.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: dion
Date: Wed Mar 15 14:54:31 2006
New Revision: 386201
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386201view=rev
Log:
Remove use of commons-build for the site
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/jexl/trunk/maven.xml
jakarta/commons/proper/jexl/trunk/project.properties
i'd really like to try to see if we can't chalk off some more tests in
different containers before i move another vote. this means find people
who use JCL and particular containers, plus are willing to test the
release candidate.
we also need to contact downstream users and ask them if they can
Commons Jexl done.
On 3/16/06, Oleg Kalnichevski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 00:12 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Progress to remove commons-build seems to be moving along nicley. So far
at least [lang], [io], [primitives], [collections], [codec], [logging]
and
I use WebSphere 5.1 on a daily basis and can replace the 1.0.4 jar we use
with 1.1 rc 6 and see how it goes.
On 3/16/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
i'd really like to try to see if we can't chalk off some more tests in
different containers before i move another vote. this
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38992.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 3/15/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we also need to contact downstream users and ask them if they can verify
that JCL 1.1 works for them. that includes tomcat and jboss (i believe
that they have a forked version served from a hacked classloader).
If you haven't already,
Henri Yandell wrote:
Uhoh:
I tried to remove my test directory and got:
override r--r--r-- hen/hen for
io-test//commons-io-1.2-RC5-src/target/jdiff/IO_1_1/.svn/dir-prop-base?
ie) you've got some .svn directories in your src zip (worth checking
the other archives too).
I think this is an
Gary Gregory wrote:
This is not so great: 0% unit test coverage on:
http://people.apache.org/~scolebourne/commons-io/site/cobertura/org.apac
he.commons.io.input.ProxyReader.html
and
http://people.apache.org/~scolebourne/commons-io/site/cobertura/org.apac
he.commons.io.output.ProxyWriter.html
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38992.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38929.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33965.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38659.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38847.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38659.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38935.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38935.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38935.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Wanted to mention something I've been doing this week on my blog:
http://blog.generationjava.com/roller/page/bayard?catname=%2FCommons
Each morning at work I sit down and go over the new and modified
issues in a collection of open source projects - mostly looking for
security issues, but also
72 matches
Mail list logo
