[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-chain (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2006-03-22 Thread Stefan Bodewig
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-chain has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-chain (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2006-03-22 Thread Stefan Bodewig
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-chain has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-03-22 Thread commons-jelly-tags-xml development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-03-22 Thread commons-jelly-tags-xml development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-latka (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2006-03-22 Thread Ted Husted
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-latka has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-latka (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2006-03-22 Thread Ted Husted
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-latka has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-03-22 Thread commons-jelly-tags-html development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-03-22 Thread commons-jelly-tags-html development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-03-22 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jsl development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-03-22 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jsl development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-03-22 Thread commons-jelly-tags-define development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-03-22 Thread commons-jelly-tags-define development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community

svn commit: r387850 - /jakarta/commons/proper/chain/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/chain/config/ConfigRegisterRule.java

2006-03-22 Thread jmitchell
Author: jmitchell Date: Wed Mar 22 04:52:57 2006 New Revision: 387850 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=387850view=rev Log: Remove useless var Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/chain/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/chain/config/ConfigRegisterRule.java Modified:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39052] - [pool] NullPointerException returning obj to pool during shutdown

2006-03-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39052. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [pool] Announcing Release Candidate 1 for Pool 1.3

2006-03-22 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 3/22/06, Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/21/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3) There was a thread about md5 checksums a while back - some md5 programs require an astix followed by the file name after the checksum: I don't get how to express this in maven. I

[codec] crypto-compat BigInt patch, no feedback for one month

2006-03-22 Thread Chris Black
Over a month ago I submitted a proposed patch to commons-codec to add crypto-compatible BigInteger encoding support to Base64 (bugzilla #38657). I have not received any feedback on this patch so far and realize it may not be a priority for others, but I was wondering if there was anything else

svn commit: r387888 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/pool: branches/1_3_RELEASE_BRANCH/maven.xml trunk/maven.xml

2006-03-22 Thread sandymac
Author: sandymac Date: Wed Mar 22 08:46:52 2006 New Revision: 387888 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=387888view=rev Log: include *filename in the generated .md5 files. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/pool/branches/1_3_RELEASE_BRANCH/maven.xml

svn commit: r387892 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/pool/branches/1_3_RELEASE_BRANCH: README.txt xdocs/release-notes-1.3.xml

2006-03-22 Thread sandymac
Author: sandymac Date: Wed Mar 22 09:13:02 2006 New Revision: 387892 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=387892view=rev Log: Updated README with a release notes summary. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/pool/branches/1_3_RELEASE_BRANCH/README.txt

Re: [pool] Announcing Release Candidate 1 for Pool 1.3

2006-03-22 Thread Sandy McArthur
Thanks for the pointer Niall. If there are no other issues raised I'll tag and generate 1.3-rc2 this evening. On 3/22/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/22/06, Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/21/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3) There was a thread

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39052] - [pool] NullPointerException returning obj to pool during shutdown

2006-03-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39052. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37227] - [pool] synchronization issues in GenericObjectPool

2006-03-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37227. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Proposal: Commons for .NET (dotnet)

2006-03-22 Thread Kevin Ross
I find myself in the C# world these days, at a tremendous loss to the libraries I am used to in the java world (not to mention some drastic cultural changes), namely commons-* and my other open projects which are very dependent on commons. I found some people who put some effort into something

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39068] New: - constructor for CompositeConfiguration which takes a list of Configurations

2006-03-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39068. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: [pool] composite pool donation signed off

2006-03-22 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi: It looks like some of this code depends on Java 1.4. Code like: assert Thread.holdsLock(pool); Java 1.4 as a dependency is fine with me but is that really what [pool] should depend on? Thanks, Gary -Original Message- From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [pool] composite pool donation signed off

2006-03-22 Thread Sandy McArthur
On 3/22/06, Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It looks like some of this code depends on Java 1.4. Code like: assert Thread.holdsLock(pool); Java 1.4 as a dependency is fine with me but is that really what [pool] should depend on? It's been my plan to take advantage of Java 1.4

Re: [pool] Announcing Release Candidate 1 for Pool 1.3

2006-03-22 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 23:55 -0500, Sandy McArthur wrote: On 3/21/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip 4) The links on the changelog and file activity report are invalid. This is a bug in the maven plugins, which may be resolved in a later version. One way to get round this is

RE: [pool] composite pool donation signed off

2006-03-22 Thread Gary Gregory
Excellent. Thanks for the link. Gary -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sandy McArthur Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 12:29 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [pool] composite pool donation signed off On 3/22/06,

Re: [codec] crypto-compat BigInt patch, no feedback for one month

2006-03-22 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 09:48 -0600, Chris Black wrote: Over a month ago I submitted a proposed patch to commons-codec to add crypto-compatible BigInteger encoding support to Base64 (bugzilla #38657). I have not received any feedback on this patch so far and realize it may not be a priority

RE: [codec] crypto-compat BigInt patch, no feedback for one month

2006-03-22 Thread Gary Gregory
Hello: I've done some [codec] work over the years and there are probably enough little fixes for a minor release but I've not seen anything to motivate me for a major release. Frankly, copying code from one project to another is not a motivation for me and actually it is not something I want to

svn commit: r387977 - /jakarta/commons/proper/pool/branches/1_3_RELEASE_BRANCH/README.txt

2006-03-22 Thread sandymac
Author: sandymac Date: Wed Mar 22 16:16:19 2006 New Revision: 387977 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=387977view=rev Log: Added blurb about non-determinist unit tests for the source distribution. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/pool/branches/1_3_RELEASE_BRANCH/README.txt Modified:

[pool] Announcing Release Candidate 2 for Pool 1.3

2006-03-22 Thread Sandy McArthur
I've prepared Pool 1.3-rc2 at http://people.apache.org/~sandymac/pool/1.3-rc2/ I'd appreciate it if interested parties reviewed it and tested it with their setup. Changes since 1.3-rc1 are limited to documentation updates and maven build clean ups. The previous 1.3-rc1 announcement can be found

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39069] New: - PoolGuardConnectionWrapper violates close() contract

2006-03-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39069. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [pool] Announcing Release Candidate 2 for Pool 1.3

2006-03-22 Thread Henri Yandell
Which KEYS file contains your public PGP key? I don't see it at: http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/commons/pool/KEYS Hen On 3/22/06, Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've prepared Pool 1.3-rc2 at http://people.apache.org/~sandymac/pool/1.3-rc2/ I'd appreciate it if interested

Re: [pool] Announcing Release Candidate 2 for Pool 1.3

2006-03-22 Thread Sandy McArthur
Opps, forgot to put my key up at http://people.apache.org/~sandymac/pool/1.3-rc2/ , fixed. I don't quite know where my key is supposed to live, I added it to svn because I observed another project doing that:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39069] - [dbcp] PoolGuardConnectionWrapper violates close() contract

2006-03-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39069. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39068] - [configuration] constructor for CompositeConfiguration which takes a list of Configurations

2006-03-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39068. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [pool] Announcing Release Candidate 2 for Pool 1.3

2006-03-22 Thread Henri Yandell
On 3/22/06, Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Opps, forgot to put my key up at http://people.apache.org/~sandymac/pool/1.3-rc2/ , fixed. I don't quite know where my key is supposed to live, I added it to svn because I observed another project doing that:

svn commit: r388017 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/pool/composite: CompositeKeyedObjectPoolFactory.java CompositeObjectPoolFactory.java

2006-03-22 Thread sandymac
Author: sandymac Date: Wed Mar 22 19:56:22 2006 New Revision: 388017 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=388017view=rev Log: Renamed maxActive and maxIdle to maxActivePerKey and maxIdlePerKey properties in CompositeKeyedObjectPoolFactory so their name fit thier function. Modified:

svn commit: r388022 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/pool/trunk/src: java/org/apache/commons/pool/composite/ test/org/apache/commons/pool/composite/

2006-03-22 Thread sandymac
Author: sandymac Date: Wed Mar 22 20:01:52 2006 New Revision: 388022 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=388022view=rev Log: added svn:keywords and svn:eol-style properties Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/pool/composite/AbstractLender.java

Re: EclipseCon OSS Pavillion

2006-03-22 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 3/21/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/20/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip/ If its not too late, maybe you can change the SCXML description to: snap/ Will give it a try. Had someone who was interested in that and said he'd take a look into it when he got

svn commit: r388047 - /jakarta/commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/pool/composite/

2006-03-22 Thread sandymac
Author: sandymac Date: Wed Mar 22 21:34:56 2006 New Revision: 388047 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=388047view=rev Log: JavaDoc clean ups and speeling corrections. :-) Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/pool/composite/BorrowType.java

Re: [codec] crypto-compat BigInt patch, no feedback for one month

2006-03-22 Thread Chris Black
Gary Gregory wrote: Hello: I've done some [codec] work over the years and there are probably enough little fixes for a minor release but I've not seen anything to motivate me for a major release. I don't mind using a snapshot or a minor release, I would just prefer not to have to worry

svn commit: r388071 - /jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/xdocs/changes.xml

2006-03-22 Thread rahul
Author: rahul Date: Wed Mar 22 22:54:53 2006 New Revision: 388071 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=388071view=rev Log: Updating changelog. Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/xdocs/changes.xml Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/xdocs/changes.xml URL:

RE: [codec] crypto-compat BigInt patch, no feedback for one month

2006-03-22 Thread Gary Gregory
Chris: You POV seems reasonable. From my end, unfortunately, I cannot take the time right now to do anything except tweaks here and there to move a release along. I'd like to let other committers opine and volunteer on this one (at least I get unbusy.) Gary -Original Message- From:

[configuration] please use optional in POM

2006-03-22 Thread Nicolas De Loof
Hello, I'm using maven2 and commons-configuration, and I need to configure lot's of exclusion as commons-configuration POM declares lot's of dependencies that are only required for some specialized use-cases. Those dependencies may be declared as optional (dom4j, servletapi,